Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 76, Issue 5, pp 767–774 | Cite as

Genotype-independent leaf disc transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens

  • M. De Block
Article

Summary

Leaves of the in vitro grown potato cultivars ‘Bintje’, ‘Berolina’, ‘Desiree’, and ‘Russet Burbank’ were wounded and co-cultivated with Agrobacterium strains having chimeric bar and nptII genes on a disarmed T-DNA. Each leaf from these cultivars formed numerous calli on kanamycin-containing medium, and almost all calli regenerated shoots. For ‘Russet Burbank’, it was necessary to include AgNO3 in the medium to obtain efficient shoot regeneration. The transformed plants have one to a few copies of the T-DNA, show NPT-II and PAT activities, and are resistant to high doses of the commercial preparation of phospinotricin (glufosinate). Almost no somaclonal variation was detected in trans-genic plants.

Key words

Solanum tuberosum Transformation Agrobacterium Ethylene Phosphinotricin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aharoni N, Anderson JD, Lieberman M (1979) Production and action of ethylene in senescing leaf discs. Effects of indoleacetic acid, kinetin, silver ion, and carbon dioxide. Plant Physiol 64:805–809Google Scholar
  2. Baker JE, Anderson JD, Adams DO, Apelbaum A, Lieberman M (1982) Biosynthesis of ethylene from methionine in aminoethoxyvinylglycine-resistant avocado tissue. Plant Physiol 69:93–97Google Scholar
  3. Beyer EM Jr (1976) A potent inhibitor of ethylene action in plants. Plant Physiol 58:268–271Google Scholar
  4. Cameron AC, Reid MS (1981) The use of silver thiosulfate anionic complex as a foliar spray to prevent flower abscission of Zygocactus. Hortic Sci 16:761–762Google Scholar
  5. Creissen GP, Karp A (1985) Karyotypic changes in potato plants regenerated from protoplasts. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 4:171–182Google Scholar
  6. Curtis RW (1982) Phytochrome requirement for antiethylene activity of AgNO3 with regard to Ethephon-induced leaf abscission by Vigna radiata. J. Plant Growth Regul 1:187–194Google Scholar
  7. Curtis RW (1987) Antiethylene properties of AgNO3 and 2,5-Norbornadiene in light and dark in Vigna radiata. J Plant Growth Regul 6:41–56Google Scholar
  8. Deblaere R, Bytebier B, De Greve H, Deboeck F, Schell J, Van Montagu M, Leemans J (1985) Efficient octopine Tiplasmid-derived vector for Agrobacterium — mediated gene transfer to plants. Nucleic Acids Res 13:4777–4788Google Scholar
  9. Deblaere R, Reynaerts A, Höfte H, Hernalsteens JP, Leemans J, Van Montagu M (1987) Vectors for cloning in plant cells. Meth Enzymol 153:277–292Google Scholar
  10. De Block M, Botterman J, Vandewiele M, Dockx J, Thoen C, Gosselé V, Movva NR, Thompson C, Van Montagu M, Leemans J (1987) Engineering herbicide resistance in plants by expression of a detoxifying enzyme. EMBO J 6:2513–2518Google Scholar
  11. Decoteau DR, Craker LE (1987) Abscission: ethylene and light control. Plant Physiol 83:970–972Google Scholar
  12. Dellaporte SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21Google Scholar
  13. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158Google Scholar
  14. Herrera-Estrella L, De Block M, Messens E, Hernalsteens JP, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Chimeric genes as dominant selectable markers in plant cells. EMBO J 2:987–995Google Scholar
  15. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229–1231Google Scholar
  16. Hussey G, Stacey J (1981) In vitro propagation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ann Bot 48:787–796Google Scholar
  17. Karp A, Nelson RS, Thomas E, Bright SWJ (1982) Chromosome variation in protoplast-derived potato plants. Theor Appl Genet 63:265–272Google Scholar
  18. Koncz C, Schell J (1986) The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet 204:383–396Google Scholar
  19. Leslie CA, Romani RJ (1986) Salicylic acid: A new inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep 5:144–146Google Scholar
  20. Meyer EGM, Brown DCW (1988) Inhibition of somatic embryogenesis in tissue cultures of Medicago sativa by aminoethoxylvinylglycine, amino-oxyacetic acid, 2,4-dinitrophenol and salicylic acid at concentrations which do not inhibit ethylene biosynthesis and growth. J Exp Bot 39:263–270Google Scholar
  21. Miller JH (1972) Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor/NYGoogle Scholar
  22. Murakami T, Anzai H, Imai S, Satoh A, Nagaoka K, Thompson CJ (1986) The bialaphos biosynthetic genes of Streptomyces hygroscopicus: molecular cloning and characterization of the gene cluster. Mol Gen Genet 205:42–50Google Scholar
  23. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–479Google Scholar
  24. Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH (1985). Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature 313:810–812Google Scholar
  25. Ooms G, Burrel MM, Karp A, Bevan M, Hille J (1987) Genetic transformation in two potato cultivars with T-DNA from disarmed Agrobacterium. Theor Appl Genet 73:744–750Google Scholar
  26. Pijnacker LP, Ferwerda MA (1987) Karyotype variation in aminoethylcysteine resistant cell and callus cultures and regenerated plants of a dihaploid potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Cell Rep 6:385–388Google Scholar
  27. Purnhauser L, Medgyesy P, Czako M, Dix PJ, Marton L (1987) Stimulation of shoot regeneration in Triticum aestivum and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Viv. tissue cultures using the ethylene inhibitor AgNO3. Plant Cell Rep 6:1–4Google Scholar
  28. Ramulu KS, Dijkhuis P, Roest S (1983) Phenotypic variation and ploidy level of plants regenerated from protoplasts of tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv ‘Bintje’). Theor Appl Genet 65:329–338Google Scholar
  29. Reiss B, Sprengel R, Will H, Schaller H (1984) A new sensitive method for qualitative and quantitative assay of neomycin phosphotransferase in crude cell extracts. Gene 30:211–218Google Scholar
  30. Schreier P, Seftor EA, Schell J, Bohnert HJ (1985) The use of nuclear encoded sequences to direct the light-regulated synthesis and transport of a foreign protein into plant chloro plast. EMBO J 4:25–32Google Scholar
  31. Secor GA, Shepard JF (1981) Variability of protoplast-derived potato clones. Crop Sci 21:102–105Google Scholar
  32. Sheerman S, Bevan MW (1988) A rapid transformation method for Solanum tuberosum using binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vectors. Plant Cell Rep 7:13–16Google Scholar
  33. Stiekema WJ, Heidekamp F, Louwerse JD, Verhoeven HA, Dijkhuis P (1988) Introduction for foreign genes into potato cultivars ‘Bintje’ and ‘Désirée’ using an Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector. Plant Cell Rep 7:47–50Google Scholar
  34. Thompson CJ, Movva NR, Tizard R, Crameri R, Davies JE, Lauwereys M, Botterman J (1987) Characterization of the herbicide-resistance gene bar from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. EMBO J 6:2519–2523Google Scholar
  35. Veen H, Van De Geijn SC (1978) Mobility of ionic form of silver as related to longevity of cut carnations. Planta 140:93–96Google Scholar
  36. Velten J, Schell J (1985). Selection-expression plasmid for use in genetic transformation of higher plants. Nucleic Acid Res 13:6981–6998Google Scholar
  37. Yu YB, Yang SB (1979) Auxin-induced ethylene production and its inhibition by aminoethoxyvinylglycine and cobalt ion. Plant Physiol 64:1074–1077Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. De Block
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Genetic SystemsGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations