Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 141–147

Dominance and reproduction in a parthenogenetic lizard

  • Mark Grassman
  • David Crews
Article

Summary

In most vertebrates, males and females are believed to differ in terms of their investment in offspring. Dominance theory suggests that one way individuals of the sex with lower parental investment can increase reproductive success would be to dominate others of the same sex. The dominant competitors are thought to achieve preferred access to mates, and thus, have greater reproductive success than subordinates.

Reproduction in parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus uniparens normally proceeds without males, but individuals exhibit mounting behaviors in captivity that are typical of closely related Cnemidophorus species that reproduce sexually. Thus, these animals provide an unusual opportunity to study the effects of behavior on reproduction apart from copulation and fertilization. In this study relationships between dominance and reproduction were investigated in the unisexual lizard species, C. uniparens. Dominance hierarchies were rapidly established and maintained in the laboratory by agonistic encounters among individuals. The number of times an individual charged its cagemates was positively correlated with the number of clutches and eggs laid. Also, dominant animals who charged their cagemates were likely to win agonistic encounters; recipients of charges usually fled. Hierarchies based on different behaviors were not all related to reproduction. Charges as a predictor of dominance was unrelated to body length, percent increase in body length and time spent in the basking site. However, individuals with a high percent increase in body length spent more time basking. This is likely a result of the increased energy demands of growth in addition to reproduction. Physiological stress as measured by plasma corticosterone titers was unrelated to dominance. We suggest that dominance is an important factor affecting reproduction in C. uniparens.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews RM (1982) Patterns of growth in reptiles. In: Gans C, Pough FH (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 13. Academic Press, New York, pp 273–320Google Scholar
  2. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein IS (1981) Dominance: the baby and the bathwater. Behav Brain Sci 4:419–429Google Scholar
  4. Boyd R, Silk J (1983) A method for assigning cardinal dominance ranks. Anim Behav 31:45–58Google Scholar
  5. Brackin MF (1978) The relation of rank to physiological state in Cnemidophorus sexlineatus dominance hierarchies. Herpetologica 34:185–191Google Scholar
  6. Brattstrom BF (1974) The evolution of reptilian social behavior. Am Zool 14:35–50Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter CC (1967) Aggression and social structure in iguanid lizards. In: Milstead WW (ed) Lizard ecology, a Symposium. Univ Kans Press, pp 87–106Google Scholar
  8. Cheney D, Seyfarth R, Smuts B (1986) Social relationships and social cognition in nonhuman primates. Science 234:1361–1366Google Scholar
  9. Cole CJ (1975) Evolution of parthenogenic species of reptiles. In: Reinboth R (ed) Intersexuality in the animal kingdom. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 240–355Google Scholar
  10. Cole CJ, Townsend CR (1983) Sexual behaviour in unisexual lizards. Anim Behav 31:724–728Google Scholar
  11. Congdon JD, Vitt LJ, Hadley NF (1978) Parental investment: comparative reproductive energetics in bisexual and unisexual lizards, Genus Cnemidophorus. Am Nat 112:509–521Google Scholar
  12. Crews D (1975) Psychobiology of reptilian reproduction. Science 189:1059–1065Google Scholar
  13. Crews D (1982) On the origin of sexual behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology 7:259–270Google Scholar
  14. Crews D, Fitzgerald KT (1980) “Sexual” behavior in parthenogenetic lizards (Cnemidophorus). Proc Nat Acad Sci 77:499–502Google Scholar
  15. Crews D, Silver R (1985) Reproductive physiology and behavior interactions in nonmammalian vertebrates. In: Adler N, Pfaff D, Goy RW (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, vol 7. Plenum Press, New York, pp 101–182Google Scholar
  16. Crews D, Gustafson JE, Tokarz R (1983) Psychobiology of parthenogenesis in reptiles. In: Huey R, Schoener T, Pianka E (eds) Lizard ecology: Studies of a model organism. Harvard, Cambridge, pp 205–231Google Scholar
  17. Crews D, Grassman M, Lindzey J (1986) Behavioral facilitation of reproduction in sexual and unisexual whiptail lizards. Proc Nat Acad Sci 83:9547–9550Google Scholar
  18. Cuellar O (1971) Reproduction and the mechanism of meiotic restitution in the lizard Cnemidophorus uniparens. J Morphol 133:139–166Google Scholar
  19. Cuellar O (1976) Intraclonal histocompatibility in a parthenogenic lizard: Evidence of genetic homogeneity. Science 193:150–153Google Scholar
  20. Cuellar O (1977a) Genetic homogeneity and speciation in the parthenogenetic lizards, Cnemidophorus velox and Cnemidophorus neomexicanus: evidence from intraspecific histocompatibility. Evolution 31:24–31Google Scholar
  21. Cuellar O (1977b) Animal parthenogenesis: a new evolutionary-ecological model is needed. Science 197:837–843Google Scholar
  22. Dewsbury D (1981) Social dominance, copulatory behavior, and differential reproduction in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Comp Psychol 57:135–159Google Scholar
  23. Ferguson GW (1971) Observations on the behavior and interactions of two sympatric species of Sceloporus in Utah. Am Midl Nat 86:190–197Google Scholar
  24. Grassman M, Crews D (1986) Progesterone induction of pseudocopulatory behavior and stimulus-response complementarity in an all-female lizard species. Horm Behav 20:327–335Google Scholar
  25. Greenberg N, Chen T, Crews D (1984) Social status gonadal state, and adrenal stress response in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. Horm Behav 18:1–11Google Scholar
  26. Gustafson J, Crews D (1981) Effect of group size and physiological state of a cagemate on reproduction in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus uniparens (Teiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:267–272Google Scholar
  27. Hand JL (1986) Resolution of social conflicts: dominance, egalitarianism, spheres of dominance, and game theory. Quart Rev Biol 61:201–220Google Scholar
  28. Lehrman DS, Brody PN, Wortis RP (1961) The presence of the mate and of nesting material as stimuli for the development of incubation behavior and for gonadotropin secretion in the ring dove (Streptopelia risoria). Endocrinology 68:507–516Google Scholar
  29. Leuck B (1985) Comparative social behavior of bisexual and unisexual whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus). J Herpetol 19:492–506Google Scholar
  30. Milstead WW (1970) Late summer behavior of the lizards Sceloporus merriami and Urosaurus ornatus in the field. Herpetologica 26:341–357Google Scholar
  31. Moore MC, Whittier JM, Crews D (1984) Environmental control of seasonal reproduction in a parthenogenetic lizard, Cnemidophorus uniparens. Physiol Zool 57:544–549Google Scholar
  32. Moore MC, Whittier JM, Crews D (1985a) Sex steroid hormones during the ovarian cycle of an all-female, parthenogenetic lizard and their correlation with pseudosexual behavior. Gen Comp Endocrinol 60:144–153Google Scholar
  33. Moore MC, Whittier JM, Billy AJ, Crews D (1985b) Male-like behavior in an all-female lizard: relationship to ovarian cycle. Anim Behav 33:284–289Google Scholar
  34. Stamps JA (1977) Social behavior and spacing patterns in lizards. In: Gans C, Tinkle DW (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 7. Academic Press, New York, pp 265–334Google Scholar
  35. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  36. Werner YL (1980) Apparent homosexual behavior in an all-female population of a lizard, Lepidodactylus lugubris and its probable interpretation. Z Tierpsychol 54:144–150Google Scholar
  37. Whittier JM, Mason RT, Crews D (1987) Plasma steroid hormone levels of female red-sided garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis: Relationship to mating and gestation. Gen Comp Endocrinol 67:33–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Grassman
    • 1
  • David Crews
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Reproductive Biology, Department of ZoologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations