Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 33–37 | Cite as

Paternal care and egg survival both increase with clutch size in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas

  • R. C. Sargent
Article

Summary

In some species of fishes with paternal care, females prefer to spawn with males who are already defeding eggs; moreover, in many species, paternal care increases with the number of eggs that a male is defending. If egg survival depends on the level of paternal care, and is largely independent of egg number, then egg survival should increase with clutch size. This result would provide a potential adaptive mechanism for female preference for males with eggs. I examined the effects of clutch size on paternal care and egg survival in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, and found that both increased with male clutch size.

Keywords

Defend Clutch Size Adaptive Mechanism Female Preference Fathead Minnow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assem J, van den (1967) Territory in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., an experimental study in intra-specific aggression. Behaviour (Suppl) 16:1–164Google Scholar
  2. Carlisle TR (1982) Brood success in variable environments: implications for parental care allocation. Anim Behav 30:824–836Google Scholar
  3. Coleman RM, Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) Parental investment decision rules: a test in bluegill sunfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:59–66Google Scholar
  4. Constanz GD (1985) Allopaternal care in the tessellated darter, Etheostoma olmstedi (Pisces: Percidae). Environ Biol Fishes 14:175–183Google Scholar
  5. DeMartini EE (1987) Paternal defence, cannibalism and polygamy: factors influencing the reproductive success of the painted greenling (Pisces, Hexagrammidae). Anim Behav 35:1145–1158Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311Google Scholar
  7. Iersel JJA van (1953) An analysis of parental behavior of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour (Suppl) 3:1–156Google Scholar
  8. Isaak D (1961) The ecological life history of the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas (Rafinesque). PhD Dissertation, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  9. Marconato A, Bisazza A (1986) Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Anim Behav 34:1580–1582Google Scholar
  10. Pressley PH (1976) Parental investment in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. MSc Thesis, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Pressley PH (1981) Parental effort and evolution of nest-guarding tactics in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Evolution 35:282–295Google Scholar
  12. Ridgway MS (1986) Factors governing patterns of brood defense in male smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui). PhD Dissertation, University of Western OntarioGoogle Scholar
  13. Ridley M, Rechten C (1981) Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76:152–161Google Scholar
  14. Rohwer S (1978) Parental cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Am Nat 112:429–440Google Scholar
  15. Sargent RC (1985) Territoriality and reproductive tradeoffs in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behaviour 93:217–226Google Scholar
  16. Sargent RC, Gebler JB (1980) Effects of nest site concealment on hatching success, reproductive success, and paternal behavior of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:137–142Google Scholar
  17. Sargent RC, Gross MR (1985) Parental investment decision rules and the Concorde fallacy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:43–45Google Scholar
  18. Sargent RC, Gross MR (1986) Williams' principle: an explanation of parental care in teleost fishes. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm Beckenham, pp 275–293Google Scholar
  19. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  20. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of Man 1871–1971, Aldine, Los Angeles, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  21. Unger LM (1983) Nest defense by deceit in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:125–130Google Scholar
  22. Unger LM, Sargent RC (1988) Allopaternal care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: females prefer males with eggs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:27–32Google Scholar
  23. Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. C. Sargent
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, T.H. Morgan School of Biological SciencesUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations