Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 227–235 | Cite as

Precopulatory sexual interaction in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): Role of a pheromone derived from dietary alkaloids

  • William E. Conner
  • Thomas Eisner
  • Robert K. Vander Meer
  • Angel Guerrero
  • Jerrold Meinwald
Article

Summary

Males of Utetheisa ornatrix have a pair of brushlike glandular structures, the coremata, which they evert from the abdomen during close-range precopulatory interaction with the female. Males experimentally deprived of coremata are less acceptable to females. The principal chemical associated with the coremata, identified as a pyrrolizine (hydroxydanaidal), has a proven pheromonal role: males raised under conditions where they fail to produce hydroxydanaidal are also less likely to succeed in courtship, and the compound itself, as its (-)-isomer, is capable of inducing the principal receptive response (wing raising) of the female. Evidence is presented indicating that Utetheisa derive hydroxydanidal from defensive pyrrolizidine alkaloids that they sequester from their larval foodplants (Crotalaria spp.). It is proposed that in addition to signalling male presence to the female, hydroxydanaidal may provide the means whereby the female assesses the alkaloid content of the male and therefore his degree of chemical protectedness. The argument is made that such pheromonal assessment of defensive capacity may occur also in other insects, including danaid butterflies, many of which share with Utetheisa a dependence on pyrrolizidine alkaloids for sex-pheromone production.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams R, Rogers EF (1939) The structure of monocrotaline, the alkaloid in Crotalaria spectabilis and Crotalaria retusa. J Am Chem Soc 61:2815–2819Google Scholar
  2. Attenburrow J, Cameron AFB, Chapman JH, Evans RM, Hems BA, Jansen ABA, Walker J (1952) A synthesis of vitamin A from cyclohexanone. J Chem Soc 1094–1111Google Scholar
  3. Barth R (1960) Orgaos odoriferos dos Lepidopteros. Bol Parque nac Italia 7:1–159Google Scholar
  4. Bettini S (1978) Arthropod venoms. In: Handbuch der Experimentellen Pharmakologie, vol 48. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Boppré M (1979) Chemical communication, plant relationships, and mimicry in the evolution of danaid butterflies. Entomol Exp Applic 24:264–277Google Scholar
  6. Bull LB, Culvenor CCJ, Dick AT (1968) The pyrrolizidine alkaloids. North Holland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Conner WE, Masters WM (1978) Infrared video viewing. Science 199:1004Google Scholar
  8. Conner WE, Eisner T, Vander Meer, RK, Guerrero A, Ghiringelli D, Meinwald J (1980) Sex attractant of an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): a pulsed chemical signal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:55–63Google Scholar
  9. Conover WJ (1971) Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Culvenor CCJ (1970) Toxic plants—a re-evaluation. Search 1:103–110Google Scholar
  11. Culvenor CCJ, Edgar JA (1972) Dihydro-pyrrolizine secretions associated with coremata of Utetheisa moths (Family Arctiidae). Experientia 28:627–628Google Scholar
  12. Edgar JA, Culvenor CCJ, Robinson GS (1973) Hairpencil dihydropyrrolizine derivatives of Danaidae from the New Hebrides. J Aust Entomol Soc 12:144–150Google Scholar
  13. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1965) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18:586–608Google Scholar
  14. Eisner T (1970) Chemical defense against predation in arthropods. In: Sondheimer E, Simeone JB (eds) Chemical ecology. Academic Press, New York, pp 157–217Google Scholar
  15. Eisner T (1980) Chemistry, defense, and survival: case studies and selected topics. In: Locke M, Smith DS (eds) Insect biology in the future. Academic press, New York, pp 847–878Google Scholar
  16. Menschikoff G (1932) Über die Alkaloide von Heliotropium lasiocarpum. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 65:974–977Google Scholar
  17. Miller JR, Baker TC, Cardé RT, Roelofs WL (1976) Reinvestigation of oak leaf roller sex pheromone components and the hypothesis that they vary with diet. Science 192:140–142Google Scholar
  18. Pease RW Jr (1968) Evolution and hybridization in the Utetheisa ornatrix complex (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). I. Inter- and intrapopulation variation and its relation to hybridization. Evolution 22:719–735Google Scholar
  19. Pliske TE, Eisner T (1969) Sex pheromone of the queen butterfly: biology. Science 164:1170–1172Google Scholar
  20. Sawhney RS, Girotia RN, Atal CK, Culvenor CCJ, Smith LW (1967) Phytochemical studies on genus Crotalaria: Part VII-Major alkaloids of C. mucronata, C. brevifolia and C. laburnifolia. Indian J Chem 5:655–656Google Scholar
  21. Schneider D, Boppré M, Schneider H, Thompson WR, Boriack, CJ, Petry RL, Meinwald J (1975) A pheromone precursor and its uptake in male Danaus butterflies. J Comp Physiol 97:245–256Google Scholar
  22. Sustare DB (1978) Systems diagrams. In: Colgan PW (ed) Quantitative ethology. Wiley, New York, pp 275–311Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • William E. Conner
    • 1
  • Thomas Eisner
    • 1
  • Robert K. Vander Meer
    • 2
  • Angel Guerrero
    • 2
  • Jerrold Meinwald
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations