Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 81–87 | Cite as

Parental investment in southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina

  • T. S. McCann
  • M. A. Fedak
  • J. Harwood


The southern elephant seal is among the most sexually dimorphic and polygynous of all mammals: males may be more than 10 times the weight of reproducing females and only the largest 2–3% of males are likely to breed. Current optimization theories of sexual selection predict that evolution would favor greater parental investment in individual males than in females. Because southern elephant seals represent an extreme of polygyny and sexual dimorphism, they might be expected to show a dramatic difference in parental investment in male and female pups. However, in a study of parental investment in elephant seals at South Georgia, using several different methods, we found no such difference after parturition. Mother-pup pairs were immobilized and weighed early in lactation, recaptured near the end of lactation and reweighed. A further 30 pups were weighed an average of five times during lactation to establish the shape of the growth curve and to serve as partial controls for the previous set of animals. Initial post-partum weight in females ranged from 346 to 803 kg (=506, SD=111, n=26). Pup birth weight was related to mothers' post-partum weight in female pups but small females often gave birth to large male pups. Male pups were significantly heavier at birth than females. However, this size difference did not persist. Male and female pups were suckled for the same period, grew at the same rate and were not significantly different in weight at weaning. Mothers lost weight at the same rate regardless of their pup's sex.


Birth Weight Growth Curve Sexual Selection Optimization Theory Sexual Dimorphism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson SS, Fedak MA (1987) Grey seal, Halichoerus grypus, energeties: females invest more in male offspring. J Zool Lond 211:667–679Google Scholar
  2. Boyd IL (1982) Reproduction of grey seals with reference to factors influencing fertility. PhD thesis, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryden MM (1972) Growth and development of marine mammals. In: Functional anatomy of marine animals. RJ Harrison (ed) Academic Press, New York, pp 1–79Google Scholar
  4. Carrick R, Csordas SE, Ingham SE, Keith K (1962) Studies on the Southern Elephant Seal, Mirounga leonina (L) III. The Annual Cycle in relation to Age and Sex. CSIRO Wildl Res 7(2):119–160Google Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1982) Parental investment in male and female offspring in mammals. In: King's College Sociobiology Group (ed) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 223–248Google Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1981) Parental investment in male and female offspring in polygynous mammals. Nature 289:487–489Google Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1984) Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature, London 308:358–360Google Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1985) Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature, London 313:131–133Google Scholar
  9. Costa DP, Gentry RL (1986) Free ranging energetics of northern fur scals. In: Gentry RL, Kooyman GL (eds) Fur seals: maternal strategies on land and at sea. Princeton University Press. Princeton. pp 79–101Google Scholar
  10. Costa DP, Le Boeuf BJ, Ortiz CL, Huntley AC (1986) The energetics of lactation in the Northern elephant seal Mirounga angustirostris. J Zool London (A) 209:21–33Google Scholar
  11. Costa DP, Trillmich F, Croxall JP (1988) Intraspecific allometry of neonatal size in the Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:361–364Google Scholar
  12. Doidge DW, Croxall JP, Ricketts C (1984) Growth rates of Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella pups at South Georgia. J Zool Lond 203:87–93Google Scholar
  13. Higgins LV, Costa DP, Huntley AC, Le Boeuf BJ (1988) Behavioural and physiological measurements of maternal investment in the Steller Sea Lion Eumetopias Jubatus. Marine Mammal Science 4(1):44–58Google Scholar
  14. Kovacs KM, Lavigne DM (1986) Growth of grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) neonates: differential maternal investment in the sexes. Can J Zool 64:1937–1943Google Scholar
  15. Laws RM (1953) The elephant seal (Mirounga Leonina Linn.) I. Growth and age. FIDS Sci Rep 8:1–67Google Scholar
  16. Laws RM (1956) Growth and sexual maturity in aquatic mammals. Nature 178:193–194Google Scholar
  17. Laws RM (1959) Accelerated growth in seals with special reference to the Phocidae. Norsk Hvalfangst-tidende 9:425–452Google Scholar
  18. Laws RM (1960) The southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina Linn.) at South Georgia. Norsk Hvalfangst-tidende 10-11:466–76; 520–42Google Scholar
  19. Le Boeuf BJ, Whiting RJ, Gantt RG (1972) Perinatal behaviour of northern elephant seal females and their young. Behaviour 43:121–156Google Scholar
  20. Maynard Smith J (1980) A new theory of sexual investment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:247–251Google Scholar
  21. McCann TS (1981) The social organization and behaviour of the Southern Elephant Seal, Mirounga leonina (L). PhD thesis. University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. McCann TS (1981) Aggressive and maternal activities of female southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). Anim Behav 30:268–276Google Scholar
  23. McCann TS (1985) Size, status and demography of southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) population. In: Ling JK, Bryden MM (eds) Studies of sea mammals in south latitudes 1–17. South Australian Museum, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  24. McCann TS, Rothery P (1988) Population Size and Status of the Southern Elephant Seal (Mirounga leonina) at South Georgia 1951–1985. Polar Biol 8:305–309Google Scholar
  25. Oftedal OT, Iverson SJ, Bonness DJ (1987) Milk and energy intake of suckling California sea lion (Zalophus californicus) pups in relation to sex, growth and predicted maintainence requirements. Physiol Zool 60:560–575Google Scholar
  26. Reiter J, Stinson NL, Le Boeuf BJ (1978) Northern elephant seal development: the transition from weaning to nutritional independence. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:337–267Google Scholar
  27. Reiter J, Panken KJ, Le Boeuf BJ (1981) Female competition and reproductive success in northern elephant seals. Anim Behav 29:670–687Google Scholar
  28. Robinette WL, Baer CH, Pillmore RE, Knittle CE (1973) Effects of nutritional change on captive mule deer. J Wildl Manag 21:1–16Google Scholar
  29. Simpson MJA, Simpson AE, Hooley J, Zunz M (1981) Infant related influences on inter-birth intervals in rhesus monkeys. Nature London 290:49–51Google Scholar
  30. Trillmich F (1986a) Maternal investment and sex-allocation in the Galapagos fur seal, Arctocephalus galapagoensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:157–164Google Scholar
  31. Trillmich F (1986b) Attendance behavior of Galapagos sea lions. In: Gentry RL, Kooyman GL (eds) Fur seals: maternal strategies on land and at sea. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 196–208Google Scholar
  32. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Heinemann, London, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  33. Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92Google Scholar
  34. Van Aarde RJ (1980) Fluctuations in the population of southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina at Kerguelen Island. S Afr J Zool 15:99–106Google Scholar
  35. Verme LJ (1969) Reproductive patterns of white-tailed deer related to nutritional plane J Wildl Manag 33:881–887Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. S. McCann
    • 1
  • M. A. Fedak
    • 2
  • J. Harwood
    • 2
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Sea Mammal Research UnitNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations