Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 265–270 | Cite as

Kin structure and the swarming behavior of the honey bee Apis mellifera

  • Wayne M. Getz
  • Dorothea Brückner
  • Thomas R. Parisian


Experimental hives obtained from cordovan queens that were instrumentally inseminated with semen from one cordovan and one Italian drone were set up and allowed to swarm. Cordovan provides a resessive genetic marker system (cuticle color) so that the workers from the cordovan and Italian male lines are distinguishable. Our results show that these patrilineal worker groups segregate non-randomly during colony fission and this segregation cannot be explained by observed age structure. Evidence of innate kin recognition in bees has been previously established. We argue that kin recognition could be responsible for the observed non-random grouping of kin during swarming.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behaviour. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383Google Scholar
  2. Boch R, Morse RA (1974) Discrimination of familiar and foreign queens by honeybee swarms. Ann Entomol Soc Am 67:709–711Google Scholar
  3. Boch R, Morse RA (1979) Individual recognition of queens by honeybee swarms. Ann Entomol Soc Am 72:51–53Google Scholar
  4. Breed MD (1981) Individual recognition and learning of queen odors by worker honeybees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2635–2637Google Scholar
  5. Buckle GR, Greenberg L (1981) Nestmate recognition in sweat bees (Lasioglossum zephyrum): Does an individual recognize its own odour or only odours of its nestmates? Anim Behav 29:802–809Google Scholar
  6. Crozier RH, Brückner D (1981) Sperm clumping and population genetics of Hymenoptera. Am Nat 117:561–563Google Scholar
  7. Crozier RH, Dix MW (1979) Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:217–224Google Scholar
  8. Getz WM (1981) Genetically based kin recognition systems. J Theor Biol 92:209–226Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg L (1979) Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science 206:1095–1097Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I, II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52Google Scholar
  11. Kerr WE, Zucchi R, Nakadaira JT, Bertolo JE (1962) Reproduction in the social bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). J NY Entomol Soc 70:265–276Google Scholar
  12. Kerr WE, Martinho MR, Gonsalves LS (1980) Kin selection in bees. Rev Bras Genet 3:339–345Google Scholar
  13. Lin N (1964) Increased parasitic pressure as a major factor in the evolution of social behaviour in halictine bees. Insectes Soc 11:187–192Google Scholar
  14. Lin N, Michener CD (1972) Evolution of sociality in insects. Q Rev Biol 47:131–159Google Scholar
  15. Mackensen O, Roberts WC (1948) A manual for the artificial insemination of queen bees. US Bur Entomol Plant Quar ET-250Google Scholar
  16. Page RE (1980) The evolution of multiple mating behavior by honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.). Genetics 96:263–273Google Scholar
  17. Page RE, Metcalf RA (1982) Multiple mating, sperm utilization and social evolution. Am Nat 119:263–281Google Scholar
  18. Roberts WC (1944) Multiple mating of queens proved by progeny and flight tests. Glean Bee Cult 72:255–259Google Scholar
  19. Ruttner F, Ruttner H (1972) Untersuchungen über die Flugaktivität und das Paarungsverhalten der Drohnen. Apidologie 3:203–232Google Scholar
  20. Simpson J (1958) The factors which cause colonies of Apis mellifera to swarm. Insectes Soc 5:77–95Google Scholar
  21. Simpson J (1973) The influence of hive space restriction on the tendency of honeybee colonies to rear queens. J Apic Res 12:183–186Google Scholar
  22. Simpson J, Riedel BM (1963) The factors that cause swarming by honeybee colonies in small hives. J Apic Res 2:50–54Google Scholar
  23. Simpson J, Moxley E (1971) The swarming behaviour of honeybee colonies kept in small hives and allowed to outgrow them. J Apic Res 10:109–113Google Scholar
  24. Starr CK (1979) Origin and evolution of insect sociality: A review of modern theory. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–79Google Scholar
  25. Taber S (1954) The frequency of multiple mating of queen honeybees. J Econ Entomol 47:995–998Google Scholar
  26. Taber S (1955) Sperm distribution in the spermatheca of multiple mated queen honeybees. J Econ Entomol 48:522–525Google Scholar
  27. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press, Harvard University, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  28. Winston ML (1979) Intra-colony demography and reproductive rate of the Africanized honeybee (Apis mellifera) in South America. Insectes Soc 27:289–304Google Scholar
  29. Winston ML (1980) Swarming, afterswarming and reproductive rate of unmanaged honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera). Insectes Soc 27:391–398Google Scholar
  30. Winston ML, Otis GW (1978) Ages of bees in swarms and afterswarms of the Africanized honeybee. J Apic Res 17:123–129Google Scholar
  31. Winston ML, Taylor OR (1980) Factors preceding queen rearing in the Africanized honeybee (Apis mellifera) in South America. Insectes Soc 27:289–304Google Scholar
  32. Woyke J (1955) Multiple mating of the honeybee queen in one nuptial flight. Bull Acad Pol Sci 3:175–179Google Scholar
  33. Woyke J (1965) Do honeybees eat diploid drone larvae because they are in worker cells? J Apic Res 4:65–70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne M. Getz
    • 1
  • Dorothea Brückner
    • 2
  • Thomas R. Parisian
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Biological Control and Department of Entomological Sciences and Plant PathologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSAUSA
  2. 2.Zoologisches InstitutUniversität MünchenMünchen 2Federal Republic of Germany
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations