Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 251–263 | Cite as

Optimal foraging: Some simple stochastic models

  • D. W. Stephens
  • Eric L. Charnov
Article

Summary

Some simple stochastic models of optimal foraging are considered. Firstly, mathematical renewal theory is used to make a general model of the combined processes of search, encounter, capture and handling. In the case where patches or prey items are encountered according to a Poisson process the limiting probability distribution of energy gain is found. This distribution is found to be normal and its mean and variance are specified. This result supports the use of Holling's disc equation to specify the rate of energy intake in foraging models. Secondly, a model based on minimization of the probability of death due to an energetic shortfall is presented. The model gives a graphical solution to the problem of optimal choices when mean and variance are related. Thirdly, a worked example using these results is presented. This example suggests that there may be natural relationships between mean and variance which make solutions to the problems of ‘energy maximization’ and ‘minimization of the probability of starvation’ similar. Finally, current trends in stochastic modeling of foraging behavior are critically discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l'hommme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axioms de l'ecole americaine. Econometrica 21:503–546Google Scholar
  2. Caraco T (1980) On foraging time allocation in a stochastic environment. Ecology 61:119–128Google Scholar
  3. Caraco T (1981) Energy budgets, risk and foraging preferences in Dark-eyed juncos, (Junco hymelais). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:213–217Google Scholar
  4. Caraco T, Martindale S, Whittam TS (1980) An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim Behav 28:820–830Google Scholar
  5. Charnov EL (1973) Optimal foraging: some theoretical explorations. PhD dissertation, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnov EL (1976a) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136Google Scholar
  7. Charnov EL (1976b) Optimal foraging: the attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151Google Scholar
  8. Cox DR (1962) Renewal theory. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilliam JF, Green RF, Pearson NE (1982) The fallacy of the traffic policeman: a response to Templeton and Lawlor. Am Nat 119:875–878Google Scholar
  10. Green RF (1980) Bayesian birds: a simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging. Theor Popul Biol 18:244–256Google Scholar
  11. Herrnstein RJ (1964) Aperiodicity as a factor in choice. J Exp Anal Behav 7:179–182Google Scholar
  12. Hey JD (1979) Uncertainty in microeconomics. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of parasitism. Can Entomol 16:385–398Google Scholar
  14. Iwasa Y, Higashi M, Yamamura N (1981) Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Am Nat 117:710–723Google Scholar
  15. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Krebs JR, Erichsen JT, Webber MI, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 25:30–38Google Scholar
  17. Leventhal AM, Morrell RF, Morgan EF, Perkins CM (1959) The relation between mean reward and mean reinforcement. J Exp Psychol 57:284–287Google Scholar
  18. MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Maynard Smith J (1969) The status of neo-darwinism. In: Waddington CH (ed) Towards a theoretical biology. 2. Sketches. University Press, Edinburgh, pp 82–89Google Scholar
  20. Maynard Smith J (1974) Models in ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. McNair JN (1979) A generalized model of optimal diets. Theor Popul Biol 15:159–170Google Scholar
  22. McNair JN (in press) Energy reserves and the risk of starvation; some foraging strategies. Am NatGoogle Scholar
  23. McNamara J (1982) Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theor Popul Biol 21:269–288Google Scholar
  24. McNamara J, Houston AI (in press) Short-term behaviour and life-time fitness. In: McFarland DJ (ed) Functional ontogeny. Pitmans, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Oaten A (1977) Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. Theor Popul Biol 85:673–690Google Scholar
  26. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology and the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  27. Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn DJ, Mitchell RD, Stairs GR (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp 155–177Google Scholar
  28. Paloheimo JE (1967) On the theory of search. PhD dissertation, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  29. Paloheimo JE (1971) On the theory of search. Biometrika 58: 61–75Google Scholar
  30. Pearson NE (1974) Optimal foraging theory. Quan Science Paper No 39, Center of Quan Science in forestry, fisheries and wildlife. University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Prys-Jones RP (1977) Aspects of reed-bunting ecology with comparisons with the yellowhammer. D Phil thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Pubols BH (1962) Constant versus variable delay of reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol 55:52–56Google Scholar
  33. Pulliam HR, (1974) On the theory of optimal diets. Am Nat 108:59–74Google Scholar
  34. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154Google Scholar
  35. Raiffa H (1968) Decision analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachussettsGoogle Scholar
  36. Real LA (1980a) Fitness, uncertainty and the law of diminishing returns in evolution and behavior. Am Nat 115:623–638Google Scholar
  37. Real LA (1980b) On uncertainty and the law of diminishing returns in evolution and behavior. In: Staddon JER (ed) Limits to action: the allocation of individual behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 37–64Google Scholar
  38. Real LA (1981) Uncertainty and pollinator-plant interactions: the foraging behavior of bees and wasps on artificial flowers. Ecology 62:20–26Google Scholar
  39. Schoener TW (1969) Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Am Nat 103:277–313Google Scholar
  40. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:379–404Google Scholar
  41. Smith WL (1955) Regenerative processes. Proc. R Soc Lond [A] 232:6–31Google Scholar
  42. Stephens DW (1981) The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim Behav 29:628–629Google Scholar
  43. Templeton AR, Lawlor LR (1981) The fallacy of the averages in ecological optimization theory. Am Nat 117:390–383Google Scholar
  44. Turelli M, Gillispie JH, Schoener TW (1982) The fallacy of the fallacy of the averages in ecological optimization theory. Am Nat 119:879–884Google Scholar
  45. Waddington KD, Allen T, Heinrich B (1981) Floral preference of bumblebees (Bombus adwardsii) in relation to intermittent versus continuous rewards. Anim Behav 29:779–784Google Scholar
  46. Werner EE, Hall DJ (1975) Optimal foraging and the size-selection of prey by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. W. Stephens
    • 1
  • Eric L. Charnov
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyEdward Grey InstituteOxfordEngland
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Smithsonian InstitutionChesapeake Bay Center for Environmental StudiesEdgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations