Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 1–33 | Cite as

The adaptive significance of communal nesting in Groove-billed anis (Crotophaga sulcirostris)

  • Sandra L. Vehrencamp
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    A two-year field study of Groove-billed anis was conducted to determine the advantage of communal group nesting versus solitary pair nesting. The following specific hypotheses were tested: a) groups have better territories than pairs; b) groups defend their nests better against predators; c) groups can feed nestlings more efficiently; d) groups can raise more broods per season; e) adult survival is higher in groups.

     
  2. 2.

    Large groups (3+ pairs) were found to occur primarily in second growth and marsh portions of the study area, single pairs and small groups primarily in the pastureland areas. Vegetation cover, territory size, and nest height differed significantly in these two habitats, but food abundance during the breeding season was similar. The two habitats were analyzed separately to separate out group size effects and habitat effects.

     
  3. 3.

    Groups in the pasture habitat had significantly lower nest predation than pairs, but there was no significant difference in predation rate between groups and pairs in the marsh.

     
  4. 4.

    Groups in the pasture were less successful in raising nestlings than pairs, but there was no significant difference in juveniles raised per pair for large and small groups in the marsh.

     
  5. 5.

    In both habitats, pairs were more likely to attempt second broods than groups. Second broods were much more frequent in the pasture than in the marsh.

     
  6. 6.

    Annual reproductive success (juveniles/pair/year) was the same for all commonly occurring group sizes within each habitat, but was higher in the pasture than in the marsh because of the high frequency of second broods.

     
  7. 7.

    In the marsh habitat, adult survival was considerably higher for females and subordinate males than for dominant males, providing a possible incentive for group formation in this habitat. In the pasture, females had slightly lower survival than males. It is hypothesized that the advantage of communal nesting is the reduction of parental care costs, particularly the risk of mortality during incubation.

     

Keywords

Predation Rate Adult Survival Dominant Male Nest Predation Territory Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, H.: The social system of the green jay in Columbia. Living Bird 14, 5–44 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J.L.: Cooperative breeding and altruistic behavior in the Mexican jay, Aphilocoma ultramarina. Anim. Behav. 18, 366–378 (1970)Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J.L.: Communal feeding of nestlings in the Mexican jay, Aphilocoma ultramarina: interflock comparisons. Anim. Behav. 20, 395–403 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J.L.: Alternate routes to sociality in jays. Am. Zool. 14, 63–80 (1974)Google Scholar
  5. Bruning, D.: Social structure and reproductive behavior in the Argentine grey rhea (Rhea americana albescens). Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Denver (1974)Google Scholar
  6. Craig, J.L.: The social organization of the pukeko, Porphyrio porphyrio melanotus, Temminck, 1820. Ph. D. Dissertation, Massey University, New Zealand (1974)Google Scholar
  7. Davis, D.E.: Social nesting habits of smooth-billed ani. Auk 57, 178–218 (1940)Google Scholar
  8. Davis, D.E.: Social nesting habits of Crotophaga major. Auk 58, 179–183 (1941)Google Scholar
  9. Dow, D.D.: Communal behavior of nesting noisy miners. Emu 72, 131–134 (1970)Google Scholar
  10. Eberhardt, L.L.: Population analysis. In: Wildlife management techniques. Giles, R.H., Jr. (ed.), 3rd ed., Chap. 22. Washington: The Wildlife Society, Inc. 1971Google Scholar
  11. Fretwell, S.D.: Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1972Google Scholar
  12. Frith, H.J.: Breeding habits in the family Megapodidae. Ibis 98, 620–640 (1956)Google Scholar
  13. Frith, H.J., Davies, S.J.J.F.: Ecology of the magpie goose, Anseranas semipalmata Latham (Anatidae). CSIRO Wildl. Res. 6, 91–141 (1961)Google Scholar
  14. Fry, C.H.: The social organization of bee-eaters (Meropidae) and cooperative breeding in hot-climate birds. Ibis 114, 1–14 (1972)Google Scholar
  15. Gaston, A., Perrins, C.M.: the relation of habitat to size of group in the genus Turdoides. Emu, Suppl, 74, 309 (1975)Google Scholar
  16. Grimes, L.G.: The occurrence of cooperative breeding behavior in African birds. Ostrich 46, 1–15 (1976)Google Scholar
  17. Holdridge, L.R.: Life zone ecology. San Jose, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center 1967Google Scholar
  18. Kepler, A.K.: Comparative study of todies (Todidae). Nuttall Ornithol. Club 16, 1–190 (1977)Google Scholar
  19. Köster, F.L. Zum Nistverhalten des Ani. Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 22, 4–27 (1971)Google Scholar
  20. Lack, D.: Ecological adaptations for breading in birds. London: Chapman and Hall 1968Google Scholar
  21. Lancaster, D.: Life history of the boucard tinamou in Brit. Honduras. Condor 66, 165–181, 253–276 (1964a)Google Scholar
  22. Lancaster, D.: Biology of the Brushland tinamou Nothoprocta cinevasans. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 127, 269–314 (1964b)Google Scholar
  23. Mayfield, H.F.: Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bull. 87, 456–466 (1975)Google Scholar
  24. Murdoch, W.W.: The developmental response of predators to change in prey density. Ecology 52, 132–137 (1971)Google Scholar
  25. Nie, N.H., Hall, C.H., Jenkins, J.G., Steinbrenner, K., Bent, D.A.: Statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1975Google Scholar
  26. Parry, V.: The auxiliary social system and its effect on territory and breeding in kookaburras. Emu, Suppl., 73, 81–99 (1973)Google Scholar
  27. Ricklefs, R.E.: An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contr. Biol. 9, 1–46 (1969)Google Scholar
  28. Ridpath, M.G.: The Tasmanian native hen, Tribonyx mortierii; I. Patterns of behavior, II. The individual, the group, and the population, III. Ecology. CSIRO Wildl. Res. 17, 1–51, 53–90, 91–118 (1972)Google Scholar
  29. Rowley, I.: The life history of the superb blue wren (Malurinae). Emu 64, 251–297 (1965a)Google Scholar
  30. Rowley, I.: White-winged choughs. Aust. Nat. Hist. 15, 81–85 (1965b)Google Scholar
  31. Rowley, I.: Cooperative breeding in Australian birds. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 16, 657–666 (1976)Google Scholar
  32. Sauer, E.G.F., Sauer, E.M.: The behavior and ecology of the South African ostrich. Living Bird 5, 45–75 (1966)Google Scholar
  33. Schäfer, E.: Zur Biologie des Steinhuhnes Nothcercus bonapartei. J. Ornithol. 95, 219–232 (1954)Google Scholar
  34. Service, Jolayne: A user's guide to the statistical analysis system (SAS). Raleigh, N. Carolina: Student supply stores, North Carolina State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. Skutch, A.F.: Life history of the groove-billed ani. Auk 76, 281–317 (1959)Google Scholar
  36. Smith, S.M.: The relationship of grazing cattle to foraging rate in anis. Auk 88, 876–880 (1971)Google Scholar
  37. Swainson, G.W.: Cooperative rearing in the bell miner. Emu 70, 183–188 (1970)Google Scholar
  38. Tinbergen, N., Impekoven, M., Franck, D.: An experiment on spacing-out as a defense against predation. Behaviour 28, 307–321 (1967)Google Scholar
  39. Vehrencamp, S.L.: Relative fecundity and parental effort in communally nesting anis, Crotophaga sulcirostris. Science 197, 403–405 (1977)Google Scholar
  40. Vehrencamp, S.L., Stiles, G.F., Bradbury, J.W.: Observations on the foraging behavior and avian prey of the neotropical carnivorous bat, Vampyrum spectrum. J. Mammal. 58, 469–478 (1977)Google Scholar
  41. Woolfenden, G.E.: Florida Scrub Jay helpers at the nest. Auk 92, 1–15 (1975)Google Scholar
  42. Woolfenden, G.E.: Cooperative breeding in American birds. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 16, 674–684 (1976)Google Scholar
  43. Yom-Tov, Y.: Effect of food and predations on breeding of crows. J. Anim. Ecol. 43, 479–498 (1974)Google Scholar
  44. Zahavi, A.: Communal nesting by the Arabian babbler: a case of individual selection. Ibis 116, 84–87 (1974)Google Scholar
  45. Zahavi, A.: Cooperative breeding in Eurasian birds. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 16, 685–694 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra L. Vehrencamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations