Advertisement

Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 1–60 | Cite as

Truth and paradox

  • Anil Gupta
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Burge, Tyler: 1979, ‘Semantical paradox’, Journal of Philosophy 76, 169–98.Google Scholar
  2. Chihara, Charles: 1979, ‘The semantic paradoxes: a diagnostic investigation’, Philosophical Review 88, 590–618.Google Scholar
  3. Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert (eds.): 1972, Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.Google Scholar
  4. Grover, Dorothy L.: 1977, ‘Inheritors and paradox,’ Journal of Philosophy 74, 590–604.Google Scholar
  5. Grover, Dorothy L., Camp, Joseph L., and Belnap, Nuel D.: 1975, ‘A prosentential theory of truth,’ Philosophical Studies 27, 73–125.Google Scholar
  6. Hawthorn, John: 1982, ‘The liar and theories of truth’, forthcoming doctoral dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
  7. Herzberger, Hans G.: 1967, ‘The truth-conditional consistency of natural languages,’ Journal of Philosophy 64, 29–35.Google Scholar
  8. Herzberger, Hans G.: 1970a, ‘Paradoxes of grounding in semantics,’ Journal of Philosophy 67, 145–67.Google Scholar
  9. Herzberger, Hans G.: 1970b, ‘Truth and modality in semantially closed languages’, in Martin (1970), pp. 25–46.Google Scholar
  10. Kasher, Asa (ed.): 1976, Language in Focus, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.Google Scholar
  11. Kripke, Saul A.: 1975, ‘Outline of a theory of truth,’ Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716.Google Scholar
  12. Linsky, Leonard: 1952, Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, University of Illinois Press. Urbana, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
  13. Mackie, John L.: 1973, Truth, Probability and Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, Robert L.: 1967, ‘Toward a solution to the liar paradox,’ Philosophical Review 76, 279–311.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, Robert L.: 1968, ‘On Grelling's paradox’, Philosophical Review 77, 321–31.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, Robert L. (ed.): 1970, The Paradox of the Liar, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, Robert L.: 1970a, ‘A category solution to the liar’, in Martin (1970), pp. 91–112.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, Robert L. and Woodruff, Peter W.: 1975, ‘On representing ‘true-in-L’ in L.’ Philosophia 5, 217–21. Also reprinted in Kasher (1976), pp. 113–17.Google Scholar
  19. Parsons, Charles: 1974, ‘The liar paradox,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 381–412.Google Scholar
  20. Popper, Karl R.: 1965, Conjectures and Refutations, Harper Torchbooks, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Prior, Arthur N.: 1961, ‘On a family of paradoxes,’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 2, 16–32.Google Scholar
  22. Prior, Arthur N.: 1967, ‘Correspondence theory of truth’, in Paul Edwards, (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 2, pp. 223–32.Google Scholar
  23. Putman, Hilary: 1978, Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Henley and Boston.Google Scholar
  24. Russell, Bertrand: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George Allen & Unwin, London (Pelican edition, 1962).Google Scholar
  25. Skyrms, Brian: 1970a, ‘Return of the liar: three-valued logic and the concept of truth,’ American Philosophical Quarterley 7, 153–61.Google Scholar
  26. Skyrms, Brian: 1970b, ‘Notes on quantification and self-reference’, in Martin (1970), pp. 67–74.Google Scholar
  27. Tarski, Alfred: 1944, ‘The semantic conception of truth,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–76. Reprinted in Linsky (1952), pp. 13–47.Google Scholar
  28. Tarski, Alfred: 1956, ‘The concept of truth in formalized language,’ in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, pp. 152–278. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Tarski, Alfred: 1969, ‘Truth and proof,’ Scientific American 220, 63–77.Google Scholar
  30. van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1968 ‘Presupposition, imptlication, and self-reference,’ Journal of Philosophy 65, 136–52.Google Scholar
  31. van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1970a, ‘Truth and paradoxical consequences’, in Martin (1970), pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
  32. van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1970b, ‘Rejoinder: On a Kantian conception of language’, in Martin (1970), pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
  33. Wallace, John: 1972, ‘On the frame of reference’, in Davidson and Harman (1972), pp. 219–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations