Computational Mechanics

, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp 381–397

Modeling mixed-mode dynamic crack propagation nsing finite elements: Theory and applications

  • D. V. Swenson
  • A. R. Ingraffea
Article

Abstract

Previous work in modeling dynamic fracture has assumed the crack will propagate along predefined mesh lines (usually a straight line). In this paper we present a finite element model of mixed-mode dynamic crack propagation in which this constraint is removed. Applying linear elasto-dynamic fracture mechanics concepts, discrete cracks are allowed to propagate through the mesh in arbitrary directions. The fracture criteria used for propagation and the algorithms used for remeshing are described in detail. Important features of the implementation are the use of triangular elements with quadratic shape functions, explicit time integration, and interactive computer graphics. These combine to make the approach robust and applicable to a broad range of problems.

Example analyses of straight and curving crack problems are presented. Verification problems include a stationary crack under dynamic loading and a propagating crack in an infinite body. Comparisons with experimental data are made for curving propagation in a cracked plate under biaxial loading.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achenbach, J. D.; Bazant, Z. P. (1975): Elastodynamic near-tip stress and displacement fields for rapidly propagating cracks in orthotropic materials. J. Appl. Mech. 18/1, 1–22Google Scholar
  2. Atluri, S. N.; Nishioka, T. N. (1985): Numerical studies in dynamic fracture mechanics. Int. J. Fracture 27, 245–261Google Scholar
  3. Barsoum, R. S. (1977): Triangular quarter-point elements as elastic and perfectly-plastic crack tip elements. Int. J. Num. Meth. for Eng. 9, 495–507Google Scholar
  4. Bathe, K.-J. (1982): Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  5. Belytschko, T.; Hughes, T. R. (eds.) (1983): Computational methods for transient analysis. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  6. Broberg, K. B. (1951): The moving griffith crack. Phil. Mag. 42, 739–750Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Y. M.; Wilkins, M. L. (1977): Numerical analysis of dynamic Crack Problems. Elastodynamic crack problems. Leyden: NoordhoffGoogle Scholar
  8. Dadkhah, M. S. (1984): Dynamic fracture under the influence of biaxial state of stress. Master's Thesis, Mech. Eng., University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Freund, L. B. (1972a): Crack propagation in an elastic solid subjected to general loading-I. Constant rate of extension. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 20, 129–140Google Scholar
  10. Freund, L. B. (1972b): Crack propagation in an elastic solid subjected to general loading-II. Non-uniform rate of extension. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 20, 141–152Google Scholar
  11. Freund, L. B. (1973): Crack propagation in an elastic solid subjected to general loading-III. Stress wave loading. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 21, 47–61Google Scholar
  12. Freund, L. B. (1974): Crack propagation in an elastic solid subjected to general loading-III. Stress wave loading. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 22, 137–146Google Scholar
  13. Freund, L. B.; Clifton, R. J. (1974): On the uniqueness of plane elastodynamic solutions for running cracks. J. Elasticity 4 293–299Google Scholar
  14. Hawong, J. S.; Kobayashi, M. S.; Dadkhah, M. S.; Kang, S. J.; Ramulu, M.: Dynamic crack curving and branching under biaxial loading. Office of Naval Res., Tech. Rpt. No. UWA/DME/Tr-85/50Google Scholar
  15. Henshell, R. D.; Shaw, K. G. (1975): Crack tip finite elements are unnecessary. Int. J. Numer. Meth. in Eng. 12, 93–99Google Scholar
  16. Jung, J.; Ahmad, J.; Kanninen, M. F.; Popelar, C. H. (1981): Finite element analysis of dynamic crack propagation. Failure prevention and reliability, Proc. of the design engineering technical conference sponsored by the reliability stress analysis and failure prevention committee, the design engineering division of ASME, Hartford, Conn.Google Scholar
  17. Key, S. W.; Beisinger, Z. E.; Krieg, R. D. (1978): Hondo II — A finite element computer program for the large deformation dynamic response of axisymmetric solids. SAND78–0422, Sandia National Laboratories, Alburquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  18. Kobayashi, A. S.; Emery, A. S.; Mall, S. (1976): Dynamic-finite-element and dynamic-photoelastic analyses of two fracturing homalite-100 plates. Exper. Mech. 16/9, 321–328Google Scholar
  19. Koh, H. M.; Haber, R. B. (1986): A mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian model for the analysis of dynamic fracture. UILU-ENG86–2003, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
  20. Metcalf, J. T.; Kobayashi, T. (1986): Comparison of crack behavior in homalite 100 and araldite B. Crack arrest methodology and applications, ASTM STP 711, Hahn, G. T.; Kanninen, M. F. (eds.), Amer. Soc. of Testing and Materials, 128–145Google Scholar
  21. Nilsson, F. (1972): Dynamic stress-intensity factors for finite strip problems. Int. J. Fracture Mechanic 8/4, 403–411Google Scholar
  22. Nishioka, T.; Atluri, S. N. (1980a): Numerical modeling of dynamic crack propagation in finite bodies, by moving singular elements-part 1: Formulation. J. Appl. Mech. 47, 570–576Google Scholar
  23. Nishioka, T.; Atluri, S. N. (1986b): Numerical modeling of dynamic crack propagation in finite bodies by moving singular elements — part 2: Results. J. Appl. Mech. 47, 577–582Google Scholar
  24. Nishioka, T.; Atluri, S. N. (1983): Path-independent integrals, energy release rates and general solutions of near-tip fields in mixed-mode dynamic fracture mechanics. Eng. Frac. Mech. 18/1, 1–22Google Scholar
  25. Radok, J. R. M. (1956): On the solution of problems of dynamic plane elasticity. Q. Appl. Mathem. 14, 289–298Google Scholar
  26. Rosakis, A. J.; Duffy, J.; Freund, L. B. (1984): The determination of dynamic fracture toughness of AISI 4340 steel by the shadow spot method. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 31/3, 251–260Google Scholar
  27. Rossmanith, H.P. (1983): How mixed-mode crack propagation? A dynamic photoelastic study. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 31/3, 251–260Google Scholar
  28. Sih, G. C.; Chen, E. P. (1977): Cracks moving at constant velocity and acceleration. Elastodynamic crack problems. Leyden: NoordhoffGoogle Scholar
  29. Shaw, R. D.; Pitchen, R. G. (1978): Modifications to the Suhara-Fukuda method of network generation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 12, 93–99Google Scholar
  30. Swenson, D. V. (1986): Derivation of the near-tip stress and displacement fields for constant velocity crack without using complex functions. Tech. note in Eng. Fract. Mech. 18/1, 1–22Google Scholar
  31. Swenson, D.V. (1985): Modeling mixed-mode dynamic crack propagation using finite elements. Dept. Struct. Eng. Rpt. No. 85–10, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Swenson, D. V. (1986): On using combined experimental/analysis to generate dynamic critical stress intensity data. Presented at 19th national symposium on fracture mechanics, June 30–July 2, San Antonio, Texas. ASTM STP (to be publ.)Google Scholar
  33. Thau, S. A.; Lu Tsin-Ywei (1971): Transient stress intensity for a finite crack in an elastic solid caused by a dilatational wave. Int. J. Solids and Struct. 7, 731–750Google Scholar
  34. Valliappan, S.; Marti, V. (1985): Automatic remeshing technique in quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation. Proc. of the NUMETA 1985 Conference, Swansea, January 7–11Google Scholar
  35. Yoffe, E. H. (1951): The moving griffith crack. Philosophical Magazine 42, 739–750Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Swenson
    • 1
  • A. R. Ingraffea
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations