Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 55, Issue 1–2, pp 25–32 | Cite as

Paleomagnetic constraints on eruption patterns at the Pacaya composite volcano, Guatemala

  • F Michael Conway
  • Jimmy F Diehl
  • Otoniel Matías
Article

Abstract

Pacaya volcano is an active composite volcano located in the volcanic highlands of Guatemala about 40 km south of Guatemala City. Volcanism at Pacaya alternates between Strombolian and Vulcanian, and during the past five years there has been a marked increase in the violence of eruptions. The volcano is composed principally of basalt flows interbedded with thin scoria fall units, several pyroclastic surge beds, and at least one welded tuff. Between 400 and 2000 years BP the W-SW sector of the volcano collapsed producing a horseshoeshaped amphitheater (0.65 km3) and providing a window into the cone's infrastructure. Lava flows and tephra exposed in the amphitheater are more then 200 m thick and when combined with flows erupted recently represent between 30 and 40% of the cone's history. Pacaya is ideally suited for a paleomagnetic study into the timing and duration of eruption episodes at a large, composite volcano. We drilled 27 paleomagnetic sites (25 aa flows, 1 dike, and 1 welded tuff) from four lava-flow sequences with between 4 and 14 sites per sequence. The four sequences represent initial through historic activity at Pacaya. We resolved, what appear to be, 22 time-independent paleomagnetic sites by averaging together directions from successive sites where the sitemean directions were indistinguishable at the 95% level of confidence. However, mean-sequence directions of individual lava-flow sequences yielded unusually high Fisher precision parameters (k=44–224) and small circles of 63% confidence (a63=1.6–6.1°) suggesting as few as three or four time-independent sites were collected. This indicates that activity as Pacaya is strongly episodic and that episodes are characterized by voluminous outpouring of lavas. Modelling the data using Holocene PSV rates confirms this and shows that differences in within-sequence directions (6–11.5°) are consistent with emplacement of lava-flow sequences in less than 100 years to as many as 300 years. Relatively larger differences in directions (18–23°) between subjacent lava-flow sequences indicates that repose is at least 300–500 years and could be even longer.

Keywords

Tephra Lava Flow Basalt Flow Paleomagnetic Study Successive Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banks NG (1986) Preliminary evaluation of volcanic hazards of Pacaya Volcano, Guatemala. Unpbls. ReportGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogue SW, Coe RS (1981) Paleomagnetic correlation of Columbia River Basalt flows using secular variation. J Geophys Res 86:11883–11897Google Scholar
  3. Butler RF (1992) Paleomagnetism: magnetic domains to geologic terranes. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 319 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr MJ (1984) Symmetrical and segmented variation of physical and geochemical characteristics of the Central American volcanic front. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 20:231–252Google Scholar
  5. Carr MJ, Rose WI, Stoiber RE (1982) Central America. In: Thorpe RS (ed) Orogenic andesites and related rocks. John Wiley, New York, pp 149–166Google Scholar
  6. Champion DE (1980) Holocene geomagnetic secular variation in the western United States: implication for the global geomagnetic field. Ph. D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 314 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Doell RR, Cox A (1963) The accuracy of the paleomagnetic method as evaluated from historic Hawaiian lava flows. J Geophys Res 68:1997–2099Google Scholar
  8. Doell RR, Cox A (1971) Pacific geomagnetic secular variation. Science 171:248–254Google Scholar
  9. DuBois RL (1989) Archeomagnetic results from southwest United States and Mesoamerica, and comparison with some other areas. Phys Earth Planet Int 56:18–33Google Scholar
  10. Eggers AA (1971) The geology and petrology of the Amatitlán quadrangle, Guatemala. Ph. D. Dissertation, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, 221 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Eggers AA (1975) Mapa Geologica de Amatitlán, Guatemala. Hoja 2059116; Instituto Geográfico Nacional de GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  12. Eggers AA (1983) Temporal gravity and elevation changes at Pacaya volcano, Guatemala. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 19:223–237Google Scholar
  13. Engebretson DC, Beck Jr ME (1978) On the shape of directional data sets. J Geophys Res 83:5979–5982Google Scholar
  14. Fisher RA (1953) Dispersion on a sphere. Proc R Soc London Ser A 217:295–305Google Scholar
  15. Freed WK, Nealy N (1974) Excursions in the Pleistocene geomagnetic field recorded in Gulf of Mexico sediments. Earth Planet Sci Letts 24:99–104Google Scholar
  16. Gardner CA (1988) Plaeomagnetic secular-variation studies along the Mount Bachelor volcanic chain. In: Scott WE, Gardner CA, Wojcicki-Sarna AM (eds) Field trip to the Central Oregon High Cascades, 1988 Guidebook: Friends of the Pleistocene-Pacific Cell-pp 35–44Google Scholar
  17. Holcomb RT (1980) Chronology and morphology of the surficial lava flows of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 320 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Holcomb RT, Champion D, McWilliams M (1986) Dating recent Hawaiian lava flows using paleomagnetic secular variation. Geol Soc Am Bull 97:829–839Google Scholar
  19. Koch AJ, McLean H (1975) Pleistocene tephra and ash-flow deposits in the volcanic highlands of Guatemala. Geol Soc Am Bull 86:529–541Google Scholar
  20. Liddicoat JC, Coe RS (1974) Paleomagnetism of Late Quaternary sediments from the Valley of Mexico. Unpubl. paper presented at the AGU Annual Meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Macdonald GA (1972) Volcanoes. Prentice-Hall, NJ, 510 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Mankinen EA (1989) Revised paleomagnetic pole for the Sonoma Volcanics, California. Geophys Res Lets 16:1081–1084Google Scholar
  23. Mankinen EA, Gromme CS, Dalrymple GB, Lanphere MA, Bailey RA (1986) Paleomagnetism and K-Ar ages of volcanic rocks from Long Valley caldera, California. J Geophys Res 91:633–652Google Scholar
  24. Marquis G, Irving E, Globerman BR (1990) Northward motion of the Whitehorse Trough: paleomagnetic evidence from the Upper Cretaceous Carmacks Group: Reply. Canada J Sci 27:617–618Google Scholar
  25. McElhinny MW, Merrill RT (1975) Geomagnetic secular variation over the past 5 m.y. Rev Geophys Space Phys 13:687–708Google Scholar
  26. McFadden PL, Merrill RT, McElhinney MW (1988) Dipole/Quadrupole family modeling of paleosecular variation. J Geophys Res 93:11583–11588Google Scholar
  27. Merrill RT, McElhinny MW (1983) The Earth's magnetic field: Its history, origin and planetary perspective. Academic Press, New York, 401 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell RJ, Jaeger DJ, Diehl JF, Hammond PE (1989) Paleomagnetic results from the Indian Heaven volcanic field, southcentral Washington. Geophys J 97:381–390Google Scholar
  29. Rose WI, Grant NK, Hahn GA, Lange IM, Powell J, Easter J, DeGraff J (1977) The evolution of Santa María volcano, Guatemala. J Geol 85:63–87Google Scholar
  30. Steele WK (1985) Paleomagnetic constraints on the volcanic history of Iztaccihuatl: Geof Int 24–1:159–167Google Scholar
  31. Sternberg RS (1989) Secular variation of archaeomagnetic direction in the American Southwest, A.D. 750–1425. J Geophys Res 94:527–546Google Scholar
  32. Vallance JW, Siebert L, Rose WI, Girón JR, Banks NG (in press) Edifice collapse and modeling of related hazards in Guatemala. J Volcanol Geotherm ResGoogle Scholar
  33. Walker JA (1989) Caribbean arc tholeiites. J Geophys Res 94:10539–10548Google Scholar
  34. Williams H (1960) volcanic history of the Guatemalan Highlands. University of California Press, Los Angeles, 71 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams H, McBirney AR (1979) Volcanology. Freeman, Cooper & Co, San Francisco, 396 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson RL (1959) Remanent magnetism of the late secondary and early Tertiary rocks. Philos Mag 4:750–755Google Scholar
  37. Wolfman D (1973) A re-evaluation of Mesoamerican chronology: A.D. 1–1200. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo, 292 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Wunderman RL, Rose WI (1984) Amatitlán, an actively resurging cauldron 10 km south of Guatemala City. J Geophys Res 89:8525–8539Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • F Michael Conway
    • 1
  • Jimmy F Diehl
    • 1
  • Otoniel Matías
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Geological Engineering, Geology and GeophysicsMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  2. 2.INSIVUMEH (Instituto de Seismología, Volcanología, Meteorología, e Hidrología de Guatemala)Guatemala CityGuatmala CA

Personalised recommendations