Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 307–311 | Cite as

Social control of deception among status signalling house sparrows Passer domesticus

  • Anders Pape Møller


Signalling of dominance status is a plausible explanation for variation in throat patch size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus. I tested experimentally how deception is controlled in such a status signalling system. In aviaries, experimentally dyed brids were involved in more aggressive encounters than controls. Active encounters made up a similar fraction of all interactions involving experimental and control birds. Dyed sparrows did not win relatively more encounters than controls. Experimental house sparrows were involved in more aggressive encounters with conspecifics having larger throat patches than expected whereas controls interacted with conspecifics with a throat patch size that did not deviate from expectation. The throat patch size of winning contestants was larger than that of losing birds both within and between experimental and control groups. Dyed house sparrows did not achieve higher dominance rank than controls. Cheating in the status signalling system is thus controlled socially by frequent challenges of house sparrows having large throat patches.


Signalling System Social Control Patch Size High Dominance Dominance Rank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balph MH (1977) Winter social behaviour of dark-cyed juncos; communication, social organization and ecological implications. Anim Behav 25:859–884Google Scholar
  2. Barnard CJ, Sibly RM (1981) Producers and scroungers: a general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Anim Behav 29:543–550Google Scholar
  3. Cink C (1977) Winter behavior of the house sparrow. PhD thesis, University of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  4. Dixon WJ (1983) BMDP statistical software. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  5. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36Google Scholar
  6. Fugle GN, Rothstein SI, Osenberg CW, McGinley MA (1984) Signals of status in wintering white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii. Anim Behav 32:86–93Google Scholar
  7. Guhl AM, Allee WC (1944) Some measurable effects of social organization in flocks of hens. Physiol Zool 17:320–347Google Scholar
  8. Innis GS, Balph MH, Balph DF (1985) On spatial requirements of captive social animals. Anim Behav 33:680–682Google Scholar
  9. Järvi T, Bakken M (1984) The function of the variation in the breast stripe of the great tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 32:590–596Google Scholar
  10. Markl H (1985) Manipulation, modulation, information, cognition: some of the riddles of communication. Fortschr Zool 31:163–194Google Scholar
  11. Møller AP (1987) Variations in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim Behav 35: in pressGoogle Scholar
  12. Parsons J, Baptista LF (1980) Crown color and dominance in the white-crowned sparrow. Auk 97:807–815Google Scholar
  13. Rohwer S (1975) The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution 29:593–610Google Scholar
  14. Rohwer S (1977) Status signalling in Harris sparrows: some experiments in deception. Behaviour 61:107–129Google Scholar
  15. Rohwer S (1985) Dyed birds achieve higher social status than controls in Harris' sparrows. Anim Behav 33:1325–1331Google Scholar
  16. Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signalling system. Evolution 35:441–454Google Scholar
  17. Searcy WA (1979) Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds. Condor 81:417–420Google Scholar
  18. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  19. Svensson S (1984) Identification guide to European passerines. Privately published, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson CM (1960) Agonistic behaviour in the house finch. 2: Factors in aggressiveness and sociality. Condor 62:378–402Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Pape Møller
    • 1
  1. 1.Instiure of Zoology and Zoophysiology, Zoological LaboratoryUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations