Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 323–327 | Cite as

Functional aspects of the pair bond in winter in Bewick's swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii)

  • D. K. Scott


The benefits to partners of monogamous pairs of maintaining continual spatial proximity in the non-breeding season were studied in Bewick's swans wintering in Norfolk, UK.

When separated from their mates, females were less successful in aggressive encounters, were threatened more frequently and spent less time feeding than when close to them. Males also suffered reduced success in encounters and a higher frequency of threats by other flock members, though the effect was less pronounced than for females. This sex difference in effect of separation may be associated with the greater weight of males and the fact that success in encounters is related to weight.

Partners appeared to assist each other by joining in aggressive encounters, as well as by ‘inhibiting’ other birds from threatening their mates. However, the precise manner in which the female assisted the male is still obscure, since the highest intensity aggressive encounters — physical fights — involved only male partners. It is suggested that the male may fight harder in his mate's presence.

Proximity of partners varied with situation and between different pairs. Partners maintained greater proximity in dense flocks than in dispersed flocks and showed a tendency to stay closer when feeding on winter wheat than on waste potatoes. Partners where the male was high-ranking spent more time together than those where the male was low-ranking.


High Intensity Winter Wheat Male Partner Great Weight Functional Aspect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashcroft RE (1976) A function of the pairbond in the Common Eider. Wildfowl 27:101–106Google Scholar
  2. Bateson PPG (1977) Testing an observer's ability to identify individual animals. Anim Behav 25:247–248Google Scholar
  3. Coulson JC (1966) The influence of the pair-bond and age on the breeding biology of the Kittiwake Gull Rissa tridactyla. J Anim Ecol 35:269–279Google Scholar
  4. Evans ME (1977) Recognizing individual Bewick's swans by bill pattern. Wildfowl 28:153–158Google Scholar
  5. Evans ME (1978) Some factors infuencing the use of a wintering site by Bewick's swans, studied through individual identification. MSci thesis, University of WalesGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans ME, Kear J (1978) Weights and measurements of Bewick's swans during winter. Wildfowl 29:118–122Google Scholar
  7. Kear J (1970) The adaptive radiation of parental care in waterfowl. In: Crook JH (ed) Social behaviour in birds and mammals. Academic Press, London, pp 357–392Google Scholar
  8. Kendeigh SC (1952) Parental care and its evolution in birds. Ill Biol Monogr 22 (1–3)Google Scholar
  9. Kunkel P (1974) Mating systems of tropical birds: the effects of weakness or absence of external reproductive timing factors with special reference to prolonged pair bonds. Z Tierpsychol 34:264–307Google Scholar
  10. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Lockie J (1956) Winter fighting in feeding flocks of rooks, jackdaws and carrion crows. Bird Study 3:180–190Google Scholar
  12. Owen M, Gullestad N, St-Joseph AKM (1977) Barnacle Goose Project 1976–77. Wildfowl Trust (unpublished report)Google Scholar
  13. Prevett JP (1972) Family behavior and age-dependent breeding biology of the blue goose, Anser caerulescens. PhD thesis, University of Western OntarioGoogle Scholar
  14. Röell A (1978) Social behaviour of the Jackdaw (Corvus monedula) in relation to its niche. Behaviour 64:1–124Google Scholar
  15. Scott DK (1967) The Bewick's swans at Slimbridge 1966 and 1967. Wildfowl Trust Annu Rep 18:24–27Google Scholar
  16. Scott DK (1978a) Social behaviour of wintering Bewick's swans. PhD thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Scott DK (1978b) Identification of individual Bewick's swans by bill pattern. In: Stonehouse B (ed) Animal marking. Macmillan, London, pp 160–168Google Scholar
  18. Scott DK (1980) Functional aspects of prolonged parental care in Bewick's swans. Anim Behav 28:938–952Google Scholar
  19. Scott DK (to be published) The behaviour of Bewick's swans on the Welney Wildfowl Refuge, U.K., and on surrounding fenland: a comparison. Wildfowl 31:000-000Google Scholar
  20. Scott P (1966) The Bewick's swans at Slimbridge. Wilfowl Trust Annu Rep 17:20–26Google Scholar
  21. Zann R (1977) Pair-bond and bonding behaviour in three species of grassfinches of the genus Poephilá (Gould). Emu 77:97–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.Sub-Department of Animal BehaviourCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations