Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 185–193 | Cite as

On the evolution of nest raiding and male defensive behaviour in sticklebacks (Pisces: Gasterosteidae)

  • W. L. Vickery
  • F. G. Whoriskey
  • G. J. FitzGerald
Article

Summary

We develop a model to explain the evolution of nest raiding by female sticklebacks based on enhanced female reproductive success derived by creating mating opportunities with the male whose nest has been destroyed. Our model depends critically on the shape of the function relating percentage hatch success to the number of eggs in a male's nest, and the probability that the female will later mate with the male whose nest was raided. Raiding by females will be favoured when the number of eggs in the nest is high providing high egg numbers reduces the percentage hatch rate. High probabilities of mating with the male in question also favour raiding. A second model suggests that males cannot reduce the probability of being raided by limiting the number of eggs in the nest. Instead selection should favour their increasing the number of eggs in the nest. Tests of these models are suggested and their relation to other factors which may influence the evolution of cannibalism are discussed.

Keywords

High Probability Reproductive Success Defensive Behaviour Hatch Success Hatch Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel'malek SA (1963) Diurnal rhythm of feeding of the three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) of Kandalaksha Bay in the White Sea. Vopr Ikhtiol 32(27):326–335Google Scholar
  2. Bobisud LE (1976) Cannibalism as an evolutionary strategy. Bull Math Biol 38:359–368Google Scholar
  3. Bobisud LE, Potratz CJ (1984) Cannibalism in clumped populations. Bull Math Biol 46:891–901Google Scholar
  4. Bosch F van den, Diekmann O (1986) Interactions between egg-eating predator and prey: the effect of the functional response and of age structure. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol 3:53–69Google Scholar
  5. Craig D, FitzGerald GJ (1982) Reproductive tactics of four sympatric sticklebacks. Environ Biol Fish 4:369–375Google Scholar
  6. DeMartini EE (1987) Paternal defence, cannibalism and polygamy: factors influencing reproductive success in painted greenlings (Pisces, Hexagrammidae). Anim Behav 35:1145–1158Google Scholar
  7. Diekmann O, Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC, Bosch F van den (1986) Simple mathematical models of cannibalism: A critique and a new approach. Math Biosci. 78:21–46Google Scholar
  8. FitzGerald GJ (1983) The reproductive ecology and behaviour of three sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) in a saltmarsh. Biol Behav 8:67–79Google Scholar
  9. FitzGerald GJ, Havre N van (1987) The adaptive significance of cannibalism in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:125–138Google Scholar
  10. FitzGerald GJ, Wootton RJ (1986) The behavoural ecology of sticklebacks. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, London, pp 409–432Google Scholar
  11. Fox LR (1975) Cannibalism in natural populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 6:87–106Google Scholar
  12. Kynard B (1978) Breeding behavior of a lacustrine population of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour 67:178–207Google Scholar
  13. Polis G (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251Google Scholar
  14. Reebs SJ, Whoriskey FG, FitzGerald GJ (1984) Diel patterns of fanning activity, egg respiration and the nocturnal behaviour of male threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. form trachurus. Can J Zool 62:329–334Google Scholar
  15. Reed J, Stenseth NC (1984) Evolution of cannibalism in an age-structured population. Bull Math Biol 46:371–377Google Scholar
  16. Ridley M, Rechten C (1981) Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76:152–161Google Scholar
  17. Rohwer S (1978) Parent cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Am Nat 112:429–440Google Scholar
  18. Skurdal J, Bleken E, Stenseth NC (1985) Cannibalism in white-fish (Coregonus lavaretus). Oecologia (Berlin) 67:566–571Google Scholar
  19. Snyder RJ (1984) Seasonal variation in the diet of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, in Contra Costa County, California. Calif Fish Game 70:167–172Google Scholar
  20. Stenseth NC (1985) On the evolution of cannibalism. J Theor Biol 115:161–177Google Scholar
  21. Stenseth NC, Reed J (1978) A comment on Bobisud's paper on the evolution of cannibalism. Bull Math Biol 40:541–545Google Scholar
  22. Strathmann RR, Chaffee C (1984) Constraints on egg masses. II. Effect of spacing, size, and number of eggs on ventilation of masses of embryos in jelly, adherent groups or thin-walled capsules. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 84:85–93Google Scholar
  23. Walsh G, FitzGerald GJ (1984) Resource utilization and coexistence of three species of sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) in tidal salt marsh pools. J Fish Biol 25:405–420Google Scholar
  24. Ward G, FitzGerald GJ (1983) Fish predation on the macrobenthos of tidal salt marsh pools. Can J Zool 61:1358–1361Google Scholar
  25. Whoriskey FG, FitzGerald GJ (1985a) Sex, cannibalism and sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:15–18Google Scholar
  26. Whoriskey FG, FitzGerald GJ (1987b) The effects of bird predation on an estuarine stickleback (Pisces: Gasterosteidae) community. Can J Zool 63:301–307Google Scholar
  27. Whoriskey FG, FitzGerald GJ (1987) Intraspecific competition in sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae: Pisces): does mother nature concur? J Anim Ecol 56:939–947Google Scholar
  28. Whoriskey FG, FitzGerald GJ, Reebs SG (1986) The structure of the populations of three species of territorial sticklebacks (Pisces: Gasterosteidae) breeding sympatrically in estuarine tide pools. J Fish Biol 29:635–648Google Scholar
  29. Wootton RJ (1976) The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Wootton RJ (1984) A functional biology of sticklebacks. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Worgan JP, FitzGerald GJ (1981) Diel activity and diet of three sympatric sticklebacks in tidal salt marsh pools. Can J Zool 59:2375–2379Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. L. Vickery
    • 1
  • F. G. Whoriskey
    • 2
  • G. J. FitzGerald
    • 3
  1. 1.Département des Sciences biologiquesUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Department of Renewable ResourcesMacdonald CollegeSte. Anne de BellevueCanada
  3. 3.Department de BiologieUniversité LavalSte.-FoyCanada

Personalised recommendations