Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 181–192 | Cite as

The World Health Organization's definition of health: Social versus spiritual health

  • James S. Larson
Article

Abstract

The World Health Organization formulated its definition of health following World War II, during a period when the social health of societies was in question. Since that definition in 1946, social scientists have dutifully followed its precepts and attempted to operationalize its concepts, including social well-being. But, American social scientists have found that psychosocial well-being may be a more accurate formulation of mental and social well-being, and they have questioned the reasonableness of a definition that requires complete health. It is proposed that scholars refine the WHO definition over the next several years, while at the same time creating bridges between a new conceptual definition and more detailed operational definitions. An expansion of the WHO definition may be necessary to include a spiritual dimension of health if social scientists can agree that spirituality is part of health and not merely an influence.

Keywords

World Health Organization Social Scientist Operational Definition Social Health Complete Health 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BarenthinI.: 1975, ‘The concept of health in community dentistry’, Journal of Public Health Dentistry 35, pp. 17–184.Google Scholar
  2. BaschP.: 1990, Textbook of International Health (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  3. BellR. et al. (eds.): 1983, Assessing Health and Human Service Needs (Human Sciences Press, New York).Google Scholar
  4. BreslowL.: 1972, ‘A quantitative approach to the world health organization definition of health: Physical, mental and social well-being’, International Journal of Epidemiology 1, pp. 347–355.Google Scholar
  5. ChisholmB.: 1948, ‘Organization for world health’, Mental Hygiene 32, pp. 364–371.Google Scholar
  6. CornfordF. (ed.): 1970, The Republic of Plato (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
  7. EllisonC.: 1991, ‘Religious involvement and subjective well-being’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior 32, pp. 80–99.Google Scholar
  8. GarnerL.: 1979, The NHS: Your Money or Your Life (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
  9. HeitzmannC. and KaplanR.: 1984, ‘Interaction between sex and social support in the control type II diabetes mellitus’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52, pp. 1087–1089.Google Scholar
  10. HoT.: 1982, Measuring Health as a Component of Living Standards (The World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  11. IdlerE.: 1987, ‘Religious involvement and the health of the elderly: Some hypotheses and an initial test’, Social Forces 66, pp. 226–238.Google Scholar
  12. KaplanR. and AndersonJ.: 1988, ‘A general health policy model: Update and applications’, Health Services Research 23, pp. 203–235.Google Scholar
  13. KingM. et al.: 1994, ‘Spiritual and religious beliefs in acute illness: Is this a feasible area for study?’, Social Science & Medicine 38, pp. 631–636.Google Scholar
  14. LarsonJ.: 1991, The Measurement of Health: Concepts and Indicators (Greenwood Press, New York).Google Scholar
  15. LevinJ.: 1994, ‘Religion and health: Is there an association, is it valid, and is it causal?’, Social Science & Medicine 38, pp. 1475–1482.Google Scholar
  16. Moore, T.: 1993, ‘Care of the soul: The benefits and costs of a more spiritual life’, Psychology Today, May/June, 28, 30, 76, 77.Google Scholar
  17. PannenborgC.: 1979, A New International Health Order: An Inquiry into the International Relations of World Health and Medical Care (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
  18. PatrickD. and EricksonP.: 1993, Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  19. PriestL. and KellerJ.: 1993, ‘Spirituality and family therapy: Spiritual beliefs, myths, and metaphors’, 19, pp. 137–148.Google Scholar
  20. StanderV. et al.: 1994, ‘Spirituality, religion and family therapy: Competing or complementary worlds?’, The American Journal of Family Therapy 22, pp. 27–41.Google Scholar
  21. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1994 (U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington).Google Scholar
  22. WareJ. et al.: 1981, ‘Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations’, American Journal of Public Health 71, pp. 620–625.Google Scholar
  23. WareJ. and YoungJ.: 1979, ‘Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of value placed on health’, in S.Mushkin and D.Dunlop (eds.), Health: Is It Worth It? Measures of Health Benefits (Pergammon, New York).Google Scholar
  24. WoodP. H. N.: 1986, ‘Health and disease and its importance for models relevant to health research’, in B. Z.Nizetic et al. (eds.), Scientific Approaches to Health and Health Care (World Health Organization, Copenhagen).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • James S. Larson
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of GovernmentUniversity of ArkansasLittle RockUSA

Personalised recommendations