Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 411–420 | Cite as

Status, reproductive success and fitness in Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra)

  • P. H. Lloyd
  • O. A. E. Rasa


Demographic data relating to herd size and stability are given for a population of Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) under longterm observation. Temporal dispersion patterns of male and female offspring differed and were independent of the mother's status. Dispersion in females appeared to be related to physiological state, and dispersion in both sexes was related to age rather than changes in parental behaviour. Reproductive success of dominant and subordinate mares was equal and independent of age and social and reproductive variables. Fitness of dominant mares, however, was significantly higher than that of subordinates, the latter having a higher foal mortality, part of which could be attributable to dominants' aggression. The fitness of all males born was 1.6:1 compared with all females. Dominant mares produced significantly more daughters than sons. This trend was not found for subordinates. Mother's status was positively correlated with dominant status in her female offspring but not related to the subsequent status of her sons. Daughters had a more than twice as great a chance of breeding than sons. For maximum fitness gains, therefore, dominant mares should produce more daughters, since a high proportion of these would also have high status and fitness. This tendency is reflected in the sex ratio skewed towards females found for dominant mares.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann J (1980) Baboon mothers and infants. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Berger J (1977) Organizational systems and dominance in feral horses in the Grand Canyon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:131–146Google Scholar
  3. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: the behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guiness FE (1984) Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth ratios in red deer. Nature 308:358–360Google Scholar
  5. Dunbar RIM (1984) Reproductive decision: an economic analysis of gelada baboon social strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  6. Feist JD, McCullough DR (1975) Reproduction in feral horses. J Reprod Fert, Suppl 23:13–18Google Scholar
  7. Goodall J (1968) The behaviour of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve. Anim Behav Monogr 1:165–301Google Scholar
  8. Hausfater G (1975) Dominance and reproduction in baboons (Papio cynocephalus): a quantitative analysis. Contrib Primatol 7:1–150Google Scholar
  9. Hausfater G, Altmann J, Altmann S (1982) Long-term consistency of dominance relations among female baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Science 217:752–755Google Scholar
  10. Hrdy SB (1977) The Langurs of Abu. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  11. Joubert E (1971) Ecology, behaviour and population dynamics of the Hartmann Zebra Equus zebra hartmannae (Matschie 1898) in South West Africa. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawai M (1958) On the system of social ranks in a natural troop of Japanese monkeys. I Basic and dependent rank. Primates 14:113–159Google Scholar
  13. Klingel H (1967) Soziale Organization und Verhaltensweisen von Hartmann-und Bergzebras (Equus zebra hartmannae und E. z. zebra). Z Tierpsychol 25:76–88Google Scholar
  14. Klingel H (1969a) Reproduction in the plains zebra Equus burchelli boehmi: behaviour and ecological factors. J Reprod Fert, Suppl 6:339–345Google Scholar
  15. Klingel H (1969b) Dauerhafte Sozialverbande beim Bergzebra. Z. Tierpsychol 26:965–966Google Scholar
  16. Maynard Smith J (1980) A new theory of sexual investment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:247–251Google Scholar
  17. Miller R (1979) Band organization and stability in Red Desert feral horses. In: Denniston RH (ed) Proc Conf Ecol Behav Feral Equids. University of Wyoming Press, Laramie, pp 113–123Google Scholar
  18. Missakian EA (1972) Genealogical and cross-genealogical dominance relations in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) on Cayo Santiago. Primates 13:169–180Google Scholar
  19. Penzhorn BL (1984) A long-term study of social organization and behaviour of Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra. Z Tierpsychol 64:97–146Google Scholar
  20. Sherman PW (1980) The limits of ground squirrel nepotism. In: Barlow G, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp 505–544Google Scholar
  21. Silk JB (1983) Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratios in relation to competitive abilities. Am Nat 121:56–66Google Scholar
  22. Simpson MJ, Simpson AE (1983) Birth sex ratios and social rank in rhesus monkey mothers. Nature 300:440–441Google Scholar
  23. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57Google Scholar
  24. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine-Atherton Press, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  25. Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. H. Lloyd
    • 1
  • O. A. E. Rasa
    • 2
  1. 1.Chief Directorate of Nature and Environmental ConservationStellenboschR.S. Africa
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaR.S. Africa

Personalised recommendations