Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 253–255

Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

  • Robert J. Bischoff
  • James L. Gould
  • Daniel I. Rubenstein
Article

Summary

Under laboratory conditions, female guppies demonstrate a clear preference for males with larger tails, and this preference translates into enhanced reproductive fitness for these males. Females also prefer males with higher display rates, a behavior which appears to be linked to tail size, but which can be experimentally disassociated. This appears to be a case of female-choice sexual selection.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in the widow-bird. Nature 299:818–820Google Scholar
  2. Brown L (1981) Patterns of female choice in mottled sculpins (Cottidae, Teleostel). Anim Behav 29:375–382Google Scholar
  3. Croy M Le (1981) The genus Paradisaea — display and evolution. Am Mus Novit 2714:1–52Google Scholar
  4. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies NB, Halliday TR (1977) Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature 269:56–58Google Scholar
  6. Davidson GWH (1981) Sexual selection and mating systems of Argusianus argus (Aves: phasianidae). Biol J Linn Soc 15:91–104Google Scholar
  7. Endler JA (1978) A predator's view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364Google Scholar
  8. Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 9:173–190Google Scholar
  9. Fairchild L (1981) Mate selection and behavioural thermoregulation in Fowler's toads. Science 212:950–951Google Scholar
  10. Farr JA (1980) Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poecillidae) — an experimental study of the effects of intermale competition, female choice and sexual selection. Behaviour 74:38–91Google Scholar
  11. Halliday TR (1978) The newt as an honest salesman. Anim Behav 26:1273–1274Google Scholar
  12. Parker GA (1982) Phenotype-limited evolutionary-stable strategies. In: King's College Sociobiology Group (ed) current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 169–173Google Scholar
  13. Petrie M (1983) Female moorhens compete for small fat males. Science 220:413–415Google Scholar
  14. Rhijn JG van (1973) Behavioural dimorphism in male ruffs, Philomachus pugnax (L.). Behaviour 47:153–229Google Scholar
  15. Ridley M (1981) How the peacock got his tail. New Sci 91:398–401Google Scholar
  16. Rubenstein DI (1981a) Individual variation and competition in the Everglades pygmy sunfish. J Anim Ecol 50:337–350Google Scholar
  17. Rubenstein DI (1981b) Population density, resource patterning and territoriality in the Everglades pygmy sunfish. Anim Behav 29:155–172Google Scholar
  18. Smith LM (1965) Changes in the tail feathers of adolescent lyrebird. Science 147:510–513Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Bischoff
    • 1
  • James L. Gould
    • 1
  • Daniel I. Rubenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations