Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 283–292 | Cite as

Active mate choice at cock-of-the-rock leks: tactics of sampling and comparison

  • Pepper W. Trail
  • Eldridge S. Adams


The importance of active mate choice as a component of sexual selection remains controversial, despite recent studies identifying traits that correlate with male mating success. We analyzed the sampling sequences of individual female Guianan cock-of-the-rock, providing quantitative documentation of active female choice in this lekbreeding species. We compared observed sampling patterns with null models of random female movement and of movement weighted by the observed distribution of male success. The courts actually visited by individual females were significantly more clumped and centrally located than predicted by computer simulations of either random or weighted movement. Contrary to simplified hypotheses of female choice, hen cock-of-the-rock were not limited either to sequential comparisons or to threshold decision rules when selecting mates. Instead, they repeatedly sampled a subset of potential mates, using the “pool-comparison” tactic. Within this pool, females preferentially mated with the males ranked highest in terms of total courtship visits received, and rejected low-ranking males. Our results suggest complex interactions between patterns of female sampling and male dispersion in lek mating systems, and also provide insights into the constraints on female sampling in lek species.


Sexual Selection Null Model Male Mating Mating Success Potential Mate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820Google Scholar
  2. Beehler BM, Foster MS (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. Am Nat 131:203–219Google Scholar
  3. Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 19–80Google Scholar
  4. Borgia G (1985) Bower quality, number of decorations and mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): an experimental analysis. Anim Behav 33:266–271Google Scholar
  5. Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior: recent research and new theory. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–169Google Scholar
  6. Bradbury JW, Gibson R (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138Google Scholar
  7. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, Gibson R (1985) Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In: Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH, Slatkin M (eds) Evolution: essays in honor of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 301–314Google Scholar
  8. Bradbury JW, Gibson R, Tsai AI (1986) Hotspots and the dispersion of leks. Anim Behav 34:1694–1709Google Scholar
  9. Brown L (1981) Patterns of female choice in mottled sculpins (Cottidae: Teleostei). Anim Behav 29:375–382Google Scholar
  10. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223Google Scholar
  11. Gibson R, Bradbury JW (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:117–123Google Scholar
  12. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1986) Male and female mating strategies on sage grouse leks. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 379–398Google Scholar
  13. Gywnne DT (1982) Mate selection by female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Conocephalus nigropleurum). Anim Behav 30:734–738Google Scholar
  14. Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112Google Scholar
  15. Klump GM, Gerhardt HC (1987) Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs. Nature 326:286–288Google Scholar
  16. Kodric-Brown A (1985) Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:199–205Google Scholar
  17. Kruijt JP, Hogan JA (1967) Social behavior on the lek in black grouse. Ardea 55:203–240Google Scholar
  18. Kruijt JP, de Vos GJ, Bossema I (1972) The arena system of black grouse. Proc. XV Int. Ornith. Congress, E.J. Brill, Leiden, pp 399–423Google Scholar
  19. Lill A (1974) Sexual behavior of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Mancus manacus trinitatus). Zeit Tierpsych 45:225–255Google Scholar
  20. Lill A (1976) Lek behavior in the golden-headed manakin (Pipra erythrocephala) in Trinidad (West Indies). Adv Ethol No 18, Paul Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Loffredo CA, Borgia G (1986) Male courtship vocalizations as cues for mate choice in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceous). Auk 103:189–195Google Scholar
  22. Moore AJ, Moore PJ (1988) Female strategy during mate choice: threshold assessment. Evolution 42:387–391Google Scholar
  23. Oring LW (1982) Avian mating systems. Avian Biol 6:1–92Google Scholar
  24. Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166Google Scholar
  25. Partridge L, Halliday T (1984) Mating patterns and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massacusetts, pp 222–250Google Scholar
  26. Payne RB (1984) Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornith Monogr 33Google Scholar
  27. Queller DC (1987) The evolution of leks through female choice. Anim Behav 35:1424–1432Google Scholar
  28. Ryan MJ (1983) Sexual selection and communication in a neotropical frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution 37:261–272Google Scholar
  29. Schwartz JJ (1986) Male calling behavior and female choice in the neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala. Ethology 73:116–127Google Scholar
  30. Seger J (1985) Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution 39:1185–1193Google Scholar
  31. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, Second Edition. W.H. Freeman, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Trail PW (1984) The lek mating system of the Guianan cock-of-the-rock: a field study of sexual selection. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Trail PW (1985a) Courtship disruption modifies mate choice in a lek-breeding bird. Science 227:778–780Google Scholar
  34. Trail PW (1985b) The courtship behavior of the lek-breeding Guinan cock-of-the-rock: a lek's icon. Am Birds 39:235–240Google Scholar
  35. Trail PW (1985c) Territoriality and dominance in the lek-breeding Guianan cock-of-the-rock. Natl Geogr Res 1:112–123Google Scholar
  36. Trail PW (1985d) The intensity of selection: intersexual and interspecific comparisons require consistent measures. Am Nat 126:434–439Google Scholar
  37. Trail PW (1987) Predation and antipredator behavior at Guianan cock-of-the-rock leks. Auk 104:496–507Google Scholar
  38. Trail PW, Koutnik DL (1986) Courtship disruption at the lek in the Guianan cock-of-the-rock. Ethology 73:197–218Google Scholar
  39. Wiley RH (1973) Territoriality and non-random mating in the sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus. Anim Behav Monogr 6:87–169Google Scholar
  40. Wittenberger JF (1979) The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. In: Marler P, Vandenbergh J (eds) Social behavior and communication. Plenum Press, New York (Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, vol. 3), pp 271–349Google Scholar
  41. Wittenberger JF (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pepper W. Trail
    • 1
  • Eldridge S. Adams
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ornithology and MammalogyCalifornia Academy of SciencesSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations