Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 261–267 | Cite as

Variation in copulation duration in Mnais pruinosa pruinosa Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae)

2. Causal factors
  • Michael T. Siva-Jothy
  • Yoshitaka Tsubaki
Article

Summary

The Japanese calopterygid damselfly Mnais pruinosa pruinosa shows three distinct copulation durations (Siva-Jothy and Tsubaki 1989). A variety of factors which might influence copulation duration were investigated. Results indicate that the temperature in the vicinity of copulating pairs, the rate at which males encountered receptive females, territory quality, the rate of agonistic interactions between males, female gravidity and female ‘willingness’ to oviposit have no effect on copulation duration. The most significant factor was the location of the site at which males captured their mates. We suggest that under natural conditions the location of the capture site provides males with reliable, indirect information about a female's intention to oviposit: it is important for males of this species to acquire such information since sperm precedence, and therefore reproductive success, is in part dependant on the interval experienced by females between copulation and subsequent oviposition. The results are discussed and it is suggested that the three observed mate-securing tactics of M.p. pruinosa are facultative and information-dependant.

Keywords

Natural Condition Reproductive Success Female Gravidity Agonistic Interaction Part Dependant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corbet P (1962) A Biology of Dragonflies. Witherby, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Dickinson JL (1986) Prolonged mating in the milkweed leaf beetle (Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the sperm loading hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:331–338Google Scholar
  3. Dickinson JL (1988) Determinants of paternity in the milkweed leaf beetle. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:9–19Google Scholar
  4. Miller PL (1981) Functional morphology of the penis of Celithemis eponina. Odonatologica 10:293–301Google Scholar
  5. Miller PL (1982) Genital structure, sperm competition and reproductive behaviour in some African libellulid dragonflies. Adv Odonatol 1:175–192Google Scholar
  6. Miller PL (1983) The duration of copulation correlates with other aspects of mating behaviour in Orthetrum chrysostigma (Burmeister) (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 12:227–238Google Scholar
  7. Miller PL (1984) The structure of the genitalia and the volumes of sperm stored in male and female Nesciothemis farinosa (Forester) and Orthetrum chrysostigma (Burmeister) (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 13:415–429Google Scholar
  8. Miller PL (1987) An examination of the prolonged copulations of Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden) (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 16:37–56Google Scholar
  9. McLain DK (1980) Female choice and the adaptive significance of prolonged copulation in Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Psyche 87:325–336Google Scholar
  10. Parker GA (1970a) Sperm competition and its evolutionary effect on copula duration in the fly Scatophaga stercoraria. J Insect Physiol 16:1301–1328Google Scholar
  11. Parker GA (1970b) The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae). II. The fertilization rate and the spatial and temporal relationships of each sex around the site of mating and oviposition. J Animal Ecol 39:205–228Google Scholar
  12. Pfau HK (1970) Struktur und Funktion des sekundären Kopulationsapparates der odonaten, ihre Wandlung in der Stammesgeschichte und Bedeutung für die adaptive Entfaltung der Ordnung. Z Morphol Tiere 70:281–371Google Scholar
  13. Rutowski RL, Alcock J (1980) Temporal variation in male copulatory behaviour in the solitary bee Nomadopsis puellae (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Behaviour 73:175–188Google Scholar
  14. Sillén-Tullberg B (1981) Prolonged copulation: a male “postcopulatory” strategy in a promiscuous species, Lygaeus equestris (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:203–243Google Scholar
  15. Siva-Jothy MT (1987) Variation in copulation duration and the resultant degree of sperm removal in Orthetrum cancellatum (L.) (Libellulidae: Odonata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:147–151Google Scholar
  16. Siva-Jothy MT, Tsubaki Y (1989) Variation in copulation duration in Mnais pruinosa pruinosa Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae). 1. Alternative mate-securing tactics and sperm precedence. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:39–45Google Scholar
  17. Thornhill R (1980) Sexual selection in the black-tipped hangfly. Sci Am 242:162–172Google Scholar
  18. Waage JK (1979) Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916–918Google Scholar
  19. Waage JK (1986) Evidence for widespread sperm displacement ability amongst Zygoptera and the means for predicting its presence. Biol J Linn Soc 28:285–300Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael T. Siva-Jothy
    • 1
  • Yoshitaka Tsubaki
    • 2
  1. 1.The Department of Biology (Medawar)University College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.School of AgricultureNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations