Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 247–254

A quantitative study of worker reproduction in honey bee colonies

  • P. Kirk Visscher
Article

Summary

In 11 Apis mellifera colonies with laying queens, about 0.12% of the males produced derived from eggs laid by workers. This result requires explanation both of why workers produce any males, and, since they do, why they produce so few. Workers may maximize their inclusive fitness by forgoing reproduction, or their sterility may be due to to enforcement of the interests of the queen or those of other workers. The presence of laying workers might then result from developmental noise in the workers, from a failure of communication of the queen's presence, or a failure of enforcement mechanisms. Selection for worker reproduction in colonies following queen loss may also play a role in shaping worker reproduction in colonies with a queen. The hypothesis of worker sterility enforced by other workers seems most likely to be correct, but further studies on these hypotheses are needed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourke AFG (1988) Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial hymenoptera. Q Rev Biol 63:291–311Google Scholar
  2. Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton Univ Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Evers C, Seeley TD (1986) Kin discrimination and aggression in honey bee colonies with laying workers. Anim Behav 34:924–925Google Scholar
  4. Free JB (1987) Pheromones of social bees. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Howell DE, Usinger RL (1933) Observations on the flight and length of life of drone bees. Ann Ent Soc Amer 26:239–246Google Scholar
  6. Jay SC (1968) Factors influencing ovary development of worker honeybees under natural conditions. Canad J Zool 46: 345–347Google Scholar
  7. Jay SC (1970) The effect of various combinations of immature queen and worker bees on the ovary development of worker honeybees in colonies with and without queens. Canad J Zool 48:169–173Google Scholar
  8. Kropácová S and Haslbachová H (1969) The development of ovaries in worker honeybees in a queenright colony. J Apic Res 8:57–64Google Scholar
  9. Kropácová S, Haslbachová H (1970) The development of ovaries in worker honeybees in queenright colonies examined before and after swarming. J Apic Res 9:65–70Google Scholar
  10. Kropácová S, Haslbachová H (1971) The influence of queenlessness and of unsealed brood on the development of ovaries in worker honeybees. J Apic Res 10:57–61Google Scholar
  11. Laidlaw HH (1979) Contemporary queen rearing. Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  12. Lüscher M (1961) Air conditioned terminate nests. Sci Am 205(1):138–145Google Scholar
  13. Mackensen O, Roberts WC (1948) A manual for the artificial insemination of queen bees. USDA Bur Entomol Plant Quar ET-250Google Scholar
  14. Maurizio A (1954) Pollenernährung und Lebensvorgänge bei der Honigbiene. Landwirtsch Jb Schweitz 68:115–118Google Scholar
  15. Margulis L (1981) Symbiosis and cell evolution. WH Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. Noonan KC (1986) Recognition of queen larvae by worker honey bees. Ethology 73:295–306Google Scholar
  17. Page RE (1988) Reproduction by worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:117–126Google Scholar
  18. Page RE, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK (1989) Genetic specialists, kin recognition and hepotism in honey-bee colonies. Nature 338:576–579Google Scholar
  19. Perepelova LI (1929) Laying workers, the oviposition of the queen, and swarming. Bee World 10:69–71Google Scholar
  20. Ratnieks FLW (1988) Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial hymenoptera. Am Nat 12:217–236Google Scholar
  21. Rinderer TE (ed) (1986) Bee genetics and breeding. Academic Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Root AI (1980) The ABC and XYZ of bee culture. A.I. Root Company, Medina, OHGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruttner F (1966) The life and flight activity of drones. Bee World 47:93–100Google Scholar
  24. Sakagami SF, Akahira Y (1958) Comparison of ovarian size and number of ovarioles between the workers of Japanese and European honeybees (studies on the Japanese honeybee, Apis indica cerana Fabricius. 1). Kontyû 26:103–109Google Scholar
  25. Seeley TC (1979) Queen substance dispersal by messenger workers in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:391–415Google Scholar
  26. Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology: a study of adaptation in social life. Princeton Univ PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Taber (1988) Drones. Gleanings Bee Culture 116:352–353Google Scholar
  28. Tucker KW (1986) Visible mutants. In: Rinderer TE (ed) Bee genetics and breeding. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Velthuis HHW (1970) Ovarian development in Apis mellifera worker bees. Ent Exp Appl 13:377–394Google Scholar
  30. Velthuis HHW (1985) The honeybee queen and the social organization of her colony. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  31. Verheijen-Voogd C (1959) How worker bees perceive the presence of their queen. Z Vergl Physiol 41:527–582Google Scholar
  32. Visscher PK (1986) Kinship discrimination in queen rearing by honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:453–460Google Scholar
  33. West-Eberhard MJ (1981) Intragroup selection and the evolution of insect societies. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson EO (1980) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). I. The overall pattern in A. sextans. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:143–156Google Scholar
  35. Winston M (1979) Intra-colony demography and reproductive rate of the Africanized honeybee in South America. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:279–292Google Scholar
  36. Witherell PC (1972) Flight activity and natural mortality of normal and mutant drone honeybees. J Apic Res 11:65–75Google Scholar
  37. Woyke J (1969) A method of rearing disploid drones in a honeybee colony. J Apic Res 8:65–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Kirk Visscher
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations