Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 283–287 | Cite as

Eusociality and extraordinary sex ratios in the spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae)

  • Fritz Vollrath
Article

Summary

Colonies of Anelosimus eximius in Panama had an average sex ratio of 0.15±sd 0.09, i.e. about five females for each male. The sex ratio in egg sacs reared was even lower (0.08±0.01), as was that of immatures in newly founded colonies (0.12±0.05). The possible mechanisms responsible are discussed. Mature colonies had an average ratio of 17 females and 2 males for each egg sac present (range: 2–91 females, 0.2–8.2 males) and contained a large proportion of females which were not inseminated but which presumably ‘help’. Since both sexes are diploid, arrhenotoky can be ruled out and it is assumed that some females do not come to reproduction, the proportion depending on the availability of resources. This mechanism may enable entire colonies to survive lean times.

Keywords

Average Ratio Entire Coloni Mature Coloni Lean Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aviles L (in press) Sex ratio bias in the social spider Anelosimus eximius, with comments on the possibility of group selection. Am NatGoogle Scholar
  2. Brach V (1975) The biology of the social spider Anelosimus eximius. Bull South Calif Acad Sci 74:37–41Google Scholar
  3. Bull JJ (1983) Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Benjamin Cummings. Menlo Park, CaGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgess JW (1976) Social spiders. Sci Am 234:101–106Google Scholar
  5. Buskirk RE (1981) Sociality in the Arachnida. In: Social Insects, vol II, Hermann HR (ed). Academic Press, New York, pp 282–393Google Scholar
  6. Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Christenson TE (1984) Behaviour of colonial and solitary spiders of the theridiid species Anelosimus eximius. Anim Behav 32:725–734Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I+II. J Theor Biol 7:1–16, 17–52Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488Google Scholar
  10. Harris H, Hopkinson DA (1978) Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. Elsevier, HollandGoogle Scholar
  11. Krafft B (1970) Les rythmes d'activité d'Agelena consociata Denis: Activite de tissage et activité locomotrice. Biol Gabonica 6:99–130Google Scholar
  12. Kreutzer RD, Galindo P (1980) Isozyme studies of two Melanocoion mosquitoes, Culex ocossa and Cx. panocossa. Mosq News 40:605–613Google Scholar
  13. Kullmann E (1972) Evolution of social behaviour in spiders. Am Zool 12:419–426Google Scholar
  14. Lacy RC (1980) The origin of eusociality in termites: a haploid analogy? Am Nat 116:449–451Google Scholar
  15. Levi HW (1956) The spider genera Neottiura and Anelosimus in America. Trans Am Microsc Soc 82:407–422Google Scholar
  16. Lewis KR, John B (1957) Bivalent structure in Periplaneta americana. Nature 179:973–974Google Scholar
  17. Lubin YD, Robinson MH (1982) Dispersal by swarming in a social spider. Science 216:319–321Google Scholar
  18. Nentwig W (1985) Social spiders catch larger prey: a study of Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:79–85Google Scholar
  19. Novitzki E, Peacock WJ, Engel J (1965) Cytological basis of sex ratio in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Science 148:345–357Google Scholar
  20. Overal WL, Ferreira da Silva PaR (1982) Population dynamics of the quasisocial spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Howard HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder Col, pp 181–181Google Scholar
  21. Robinson MH, Robinson B (1970) The prey caught by a sample population of the spider Argiope argentata in Panama: A years' census data. Zool J Linn Soc 49:345–357Google Scholar
  22. Sekiguchi K (1955) Differences in the spinning organs between male and female adult spiders. Sci Rep Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku Sect B 8:23–32Google Scholar
  23. Shear WA (1970) The evolution of social phenomena in spiders. Bull Br Arachnol Soc 1:65–77Google Scholar
  24. Simon E (1891) Observations biologiques sur les Arachnides. Ann Soc Entomol France 60:5–16Google Scholar
  25. Smith DRR (1985) Population dynamics of Anelosmius eximius (Theridiidae). J Arachnol (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Strassman JE (1984) Female biased sex ratios in social insects lacking morphological castes. Evolution 38:256–266Google Scholar
  27. Syren RM, Luyckx P (1977) Permanent segmental interchange complex in the termite Incisitermes schwarzi. Nature 266:167–168Google Scholar
  28. Tapia Y, De Vries T (1981) Tolerancia y cooperation en la Araña social Anelosimus jucundus des bosque tropical Rio Palenque, Ecuador. Rev Univ Catholica Ecuador 8:51–74Google Scholar
  29. Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263Google Scholar
  30. Vollrath F (1980) Male body size and fitness in the web-building spider Nephila clavipes. Z Tierpsychol 53:61–78Google Scholar
  31. Vollrath F (1982) Colony foundation in a social spider. Z Tierpsychol 60:313–324Google Scholar
  32. Vollrath F, Rohde-Arndt D (1983) Prey capture and feeding in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. Z Tierpsychol 61:334–340Google Scholar
  33. Vollrath F, Windsor D (in press) Subsocial and social Anelosimus: a comparison especially of nest defence. In: Robinson MH (ed) Proceedings IXth Internatl Arachnol CongressGoogle Scholar
  34. West MJ (1967) Foundress associations in polistine wasps: dominance hierarchies and the evolution of social behaviour. Science 157:1584–1585Google Scholar
  35. White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution. (3rd ed) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson EO (1971) The social insects. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson DS, Colwell RK (1981) Evolution of sex ratio in structured demes. Evolution 35:882–897Google Scholar
  38. Zimmering S, Sandler L, Nicoletti B (1970) Mechanisms of meiotic drive. Annu Rev Genet 4:409–436Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fritz Vollrath
    • 1
  1. 1.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstitutePanama

Personalised recommendations