Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 143–150 | Cite as

Philopatry, reproductive success of females, and maternal investment in the red-necked wallaby

  • C. N. Johnson
Article

Summary

Female red-necked wallabies settle within their mothers' home ranges, apparently for life, while males disperse at about two years of age. However, sons spend much more time with their mothers before dispersing than do daughters of similar ages. Females who associate regularly with their subadult offspring are less likely to reproduce successfully at their next breeding attempt than are females who spend little time with their subadults, and sons therefore impose greater short-term reproductive costs on their mothers than do daughters. Females who are generally gregarious also suffer reduced reproductive success, even though reproductive success is independent of local density. It is suggested that the reproductive costs to females of associating with their subadult offspring, and other relatives, are incurred through tolerance of ecological competition from those kin, and therefore reflect a form of prolonged maternal investment, which is initially heaviest in sons but is sustained for longer periods in daughters. Females produce equal numbers of male and female offspring, and spend equal amounts of time suckling them in infancy.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bulmer MG, Taylor PD (1980) Dispersal and the sex ratio. Nature 284:448–449Google Scholar
  2. Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165Google Scholar
  3. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1982) Parental investment and the sex ratio of progeny in mammals. In: King's College Sociobiology Group (eds) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1982a) Competition between female relatives in a matrilocal mammal. Nature 300:178–180Google Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982b) Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Dittus WPJ (1979) The evolution of behaviours regulating density and age-specific sex ratios in a primate population. Behaviour 69:265–302Google Scholar
  7. Dobson FS (1982) Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim Behav 30:1183–1193Google Scholar
  8. Douglas-Hamilton I (1972) On the ecology and behaviour of the African elephant. Ph D thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Downhower JF, Armitage KB (1971) The yellow-bellied marmot and the evolution of polygamy. Am Nat 105:355–370Google Scholar
  10. Fisher RA (1930) The geneticla theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162Google Scholar
  12. Harrington FH, Mech LD, Fritts SH (1983) Pack size and wolf pup survival: their relationship under varying ecological conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:19–26Google Scholar
  13. Harris MA, Murie JO (1984) Inheritance of nest sites in female Columbian ground squirrels. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:97–102Google Scholar
  14. Hoogland JL (1979) Sex ratio and local resource competition. Am Nat 117:796–797Google Scholar
  15. Hoogland JL (1981) Nepotism and cooperative breeding in the black-tailed prairie dog (Sciuridae: Cynomys ludovicianus). In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behaviour: recent research and new theory. Chiron Press, ConcordGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson CN (1985) Ecology, social behaviour and reproductive success in a population of red-necked wallabies. Ph D thesis, University of New England, ArmidaleGoogle Scholar
  17. Malcom JR, Marten K (1982) Natural selection and the communal rearing of pups in African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:1–13Google Scholar
  18. Mills MGL (1985) Related spotted hyaenas forage together bud do not cooperate in rearing young. Nature 316:61–62Google Scholar
  19. Moehlmann PD (1979) Jackal helpers and pup survival. Nature 277:382–383Google Scholar
  20. Packer C (1979) Inter-troop transfer and inbreeding avoidance in Papio anubis. Anim Behav 27:1–36Google Scholar
  21. Schaick VP von (1983) Why are diurnal primates living in grous? Behav 87:120–144Google Scholar
  22. Scott DK (1980) Functional aspects of prolonged parental care in Bewick's swans. Anim Behav 28:938–952Google Scholar
  23. Scott DK (1984) Parent-offspring association in mute swans (Cygnus olor). Z Tierpsychol 64:74–86Google Scholar
  24. Waser PM, Jones WJ (1983) Natal philopatry among solitary mammals. Q Rev Biol 58:355–390Google Scholar
  25. Wasser SK, Barash DP (1983) Reproductive suppression among female mammals: implications for biomedicine and sexual selection theory. Q Rev Biol 58:513–538Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. N. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem ManagementUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations