Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 105–114 | Cite as

Parental care of nestlings by male red-winged blackbirds

  • Alison M. Muldal
  • J. David Moffatt
  • Raleigh J. Robertson
Article

Summary

Nestling feeding by males is less common among birds with polygynous mating systems than in monogamous species, because of the pronounced trade-off between parental behavior and the attraction of additional mates. In this study, however, we found that male red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) commonly assisted females in feeding nestlings in several Ontario marshes. Male parental care was additional to that provided by females, and it significantly enhanced the fledging success of nests (Table 2). Male redwings did not help to feed all nests on their territories: primary and secondary nests were much more likely to receive male parental care than tertiary and later nests. Contrary to expectation, male parental care was not restricted to the nests of primary females: a greater proportion of secondary than primary nests were assisted (Tables 4a and b). The presence of new females settling on the territory at the same time that a resident female had nestlings, resulted in males deferring parental care until a later brood. This suggests that males trade off the recruitment of females against parental care to an existing brood. Although the number of nestlings fledging from a male's territory was strongly influenced by the number of females in the harem, males could additionally increase their reproductive success by feeding nestlings in one or more nests on their territories (Fig. 2). The reproductive success of females was significantly enhanced by male assistance in feeding nestlings (Table 3). However, those females not receiving male assistance on territories of “feeding” males did not suffer a significantly reduced reproductive success in comparison to females on territories of “non-feeding” males (Table 2). Males varied considerably in the quality of brood care given. We therefore suggest that the quality of male parental care may be a factor considered by females in choosing a breeding situation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen AA (1914) The red-winged blackbird: a study in the ecology of a cattail marsh. Proc Linn Soc, NY 24–25:43–128Google Scholar
  2. Beer JR, Tibbitts D (1950) Nesting behaviour of the red-winged blackbird. Flicker 22:61–77Google Scholar
  3. Blakley NR (1976) Successive polygyny in upland nesting red-winged blackbirds. Condor 78:129–133Google Scholar
  4. Case NA, Hewitt OH (1963) Nesting and productivity of the red-winged blackbird in relation to habitat. Living Bird 2:7–20Google Scholar
  5. Crawford RD (1977) Breeding biology of year-old and older female red-winged and yellow-headed blackbirds. Wilson Bull 89:73–80Google Scholar
  6. Fiala KL (1981) Reproductive cost and the sex ratio in red-winged blackbirds. In: RD Alexander, DW Tinkle (eds) Natural Selection and Social Behavior. Chiron Press, New York, NY pp 198–214Google Scholar
  7. Fiala KL, Congdon JD (1983) Energetic consequences of sexual size dimorphism in nestling red-winged blackbirds. Ecology 64:642–647Google Scholar
  8. Gori DF (1984) Evolution of paternal care patterns and coloniality in yellow-headed blackbirds (Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus). PhD thesis, University of Arizona, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  9. Holm CH (1973) Breeding sex ratios, territoriality and reproductive success in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 54:356–365Google Scholar
  10. Martin SG (1974) Adaptations for polygynous breeding in the bobolink, Dolichonyx oryzivorus. Am Zool 14:109–119Google Scholar
  11. Mayfield H (1961) Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bull 73:255–261Google Scholar
  12. Nero RW (1956) A behavior study of the red-winged blackbird. I Mating and nesting activities. Wilson Bull 68:4–37Google Scholar
  13. Orians GH (1961) The ecology of blackbird (Agelaius) social systems. Ecol Monogr 31:285–312Google Scholar
  14. Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603Google Scholar
  15. Orians GH (1980) Some adaptations of marsh-nesting blackbirds. Monogr in Population Biology 14, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Patterson CB (1979) Relative parental investment in the red-winged blackbird. PhD thesis, Indiana UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Patterson CB, Erckmann WJ, Orians GH (1980) An experimental study of parental investment and polygyny in male blackbirds. Am Nat 116:757–769Google Scholar
  18. Payne RB (1979) Sexual selection and intersexual differences in variance of breeding success. Am Nat 114:447–452Google Scholar
  19. Picman J (1981) The adaptive value of polygyny in marshnesting red-winged blackbirds; renesting territory tenacity, and mate fidelity of females. Can J Zool 59:2284–2296Google Scholar
  20. Searcy WA (1979) Female choice of mates: a general model for birds and its application to red-winged blackbirds. Am Nat 114:77–100Google Scholar
  21. Searcy WA (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85Google Scholar
  22. Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1981) Does the sexy son hypothesis apply to mate choice in red-winged blackbirds? Am Nat 117:343–348Google Scholar
  23. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. Verner J, Willson MF (1966) The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecology 47:143–147Google Scholar
  25. Weatherhead PJ (1984) Mate choice in avian polygyny: why do females prefer older males? Am Nat 123:873–875Google Scholar
  26. Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: “The sexy son hypothesis”. Am Nat 113:201–208Google Scholar
  27. Wittenberger JF (1981) Animal Social Behavior. Duxbury Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. Yasukawa K, Searcy WA (1982) Aggression in female redwinged blackbirds: a strategy to ensure male parental investment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:13–17Google Scholar
  29. Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison M. Muldal
    • 1
  • J. David Moffatt
    • 1
  • Raleigh J. Robertson
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentQueen's UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations