Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 229–238 | Cite as

Display dispersion and diet of birds of paradise: a comparison of nine species

  • Bruce Beehler
  • Stephen G. Pruett-Jones
Article

Summary

Birds of paradise (Paradisaeidae) are a diverse, poorly known group of tropical forest passerines. The majority of species (34 of 43) are sexually dimorphic, known or presumed to be promiscuous, and known to exhibit a range of male spacing patterns, from territoriality to lek behavior. In this study we mapped male dispersion in nine species of birds of paradise at three sites in Papua New Guinea. We observed four patterns: 1) Dispersed (territorial): Black-billed Sicklebill (Epimachus albertisi), Brown Sicklebill (E. meyeri), and Superb Bird of Paradise (Lophorina superba); 2) Dispersed (non-territorial): Magnificent Riflebird (Ptiloris magnificus), Magnificent Bird of Paradise (Diphyllodes magnificus), and Twelve-wired Bird of Paradise (Seleucidis melanoleuca); 3) Exploded lek: King Bird of Paradise (Cicinnurus reguis)-most males paired, and Lawes' Six-wired Bird of Paradise (Parotia lawesii); and 4) True lek: Raggiana Bird of Paradise (Paradisaea raggiana). These findings revise earlier assessments of spacing in some species, and the example of C. regius is the first documentation of a paired-male distribution for birds of paradise. In Table 3 we categorize all species of promiscuous birds of paradise into these four classes of dispersion. Comparison of diet with dispersion revealed a significant relationship between the extent of frugivory and the breakdown of widely-spaced territorial behavior. Obligate insectivores defended exclusive territories, while highly frugivorous species formed leks. Species with intermediate diets showed patterns of dispersion intermediate between these two extremes. Resource defense appears to be a viable option for species whose diet contains less than approximately 50% fruit.

Keywords

Significant Relationship Defend Tropical Forest Viable Option Early Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechler B (1983a) The behavioral ecology of four birds of paradise. PhD dissertation, Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beehler B (1983b) Frugivory and polygamy in birds of paradise. Auk 100:1–12Google Scholar
  3. Beehler B (1983c) Notes on the behaviour and ecology of MacGregor's Bird of Paradise. Emu 83:28–30Google Scholar
  4. Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 19–80Google Scholar
  5. Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron press, New York, pp 138–169Google Scholar
  6. Brown JL (1975) The evolution of behavior. Norton Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JL, Orians GH (1970) Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:239–262Google Scholar
  8. Cooper WT, Forshaw JM (1977) The birds of paradise and bowerbirds. Collins Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  9. Crook JH (1964) The evolution of social organization and visual communication in weaverbirds (Ploceinae). Behaviour (Suppl) 10:1–178Google Scholar
  10. Diamond JM (1972) Avifauna of the eastern highlands of New Guinea. Publ Nuttall Ornith Club 12, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Emlen SG, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223Google Scholar
  12. Foster MS (1977) Odd couples in manakins: a study in social organization and cooperative breeding in Chiroxiphia linearis. Am Nat 111:845–853Google Scholar
  13. Gilliard ET (1969) Birds of paradise and bower birds. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Gullion GW (1976) Reevaluation of “activity clustering” by male grouse. Auk 93:192–193Google Scholar
  15. Hjorth I (1970) Reproductive behavior in Tetraonidae. Viltrevy 7:183–596Google Scholar
  16. LeCroy M (1981) The genus Paradisaea: displays and evolution. Am Mus Nat Hist Novit 2714:1–52Google Scholar
  17. LeCroy M, Kulupi A, Peckover WS (1980) Goldie's Bird of Paradise: display, natural history and traditional relationships of the people to the bird. Wilson Bull 92:289–301Google Scholar
  18. Lill A (1976) Lek behavior in the Golden-headed Manakin Pipra erythrocephala in Trinidad (West Indies). Fortschr Verhaltensforsch 18:1–84Google Scholar
  19. Myers JP (1979) Leks, sex and buff-breasted sandpipers. Am Birds 33:823–825Google Scholar
  20. Orians GH (1961) The ecology of blackbird (Agelaius) social systems. Ecol Monogr 31:285–312Google Scholar
  21. Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603Google Scholar
  22. Oring LW (1982) Avian mating systems. In: Farner DS, King JR (eds) Avian biology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–92Google Scholar
  23. Payne R, Payne K (1977) Social organization and mating suecess in local song populations of village indigo birds Vidua chalybeata. Zeit Tier 45:113–173Google Scholar
  24. Pitelka FA (1959) Numbers, breeding schedule, and territoriality in pectoral sandpipers of northern Alaska. Condor 61:233–262Google Scholar
  25. Pitelka FA, Holmes RT, MacLean SF (1974) Ecology and evolution of social organization in arctic sandpipers. Am Zool 14:185–204Google Scholar
  26. Pruett-Jones MA, Pruett-Jones SG (1982) Spacing and distribution of bowers in MacGregor's Bowerbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:25–32Google Scholar
  27. Schodde R (1976) Evolution of the birds-of-paradise and bowerbirds: a resynthesis. In: Frith HJ, Calaby JH (eds) Proc Int Ornith Congr No 16. Austr Acad Sci, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott JW (1942) Mating behavior of the Sage Crouse. Auk 59:477–498Google Scholar
  29. Snow BK (1974) Lek behavior and breeding of Guy's hermit hummingbird Phaethornis guy. Ibis 116:278–297Google Scholar
  30. Snow DW (1976) The web of adaptation. Quadrangle Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Warner RR (1980) The coevolution of behavioral and life history characteristics. In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, pp 151–188Google Scholar
  32. Wiley RH (1974) Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse. Q Rev Biol 49:210–227Google Scholar
  33. Wittenberger JF (1978) The evolution of mating systems in grouse. Condor 80:126–137Google Scholar
  34. Wittenberger JF (1979) The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. In: Marler P, Vandenburgh JG (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 271–349Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Beehler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephen G. Pruett-Jones
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Zoology and Museum of Vertebrate ZoologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations