Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 83–92 | Cite as

Food and the deceptive acquisition of mates by polygynous male harriers

  • R. E. Simmons
Article

Summary

Female northern harriers Circus cyaneus are polygynous, marsh-nesting raptors, whose mate choices are enigmatic. I determined the mate choice cues employed by females by correlating the order in which males were chosen with characters that 1) significantly influenced reproductive success; 2) were assessable prior to settlement; and 3) varied between breeding situations. Only nest sites and male provisioning performance met all these conditions: wet nest sites significantly (P<0.05) increased nest survival and high provisioning rates significantly (P<0.01) enhanced brood survival. The order in which females settled was strongly correlated with provisioning performance in both years (r s -0.65, and r s -0.84), but not with nest site quality. Females thus apperared to choose males principally on provisioning performance. Despite using the same cue, however, females choosing mated males reared only 0.28 young for every nestling raised by concurrently settling monogamous females (the lowest ratio recorded for any avian species). Extrapolation of male courtship provisioning patterns from clutch sizes and laying date indicated that females received similar proportions prior to and during egg-laying, but that males later preferentially fed α females. Secondary females therefore chose mated males on the basis of a temporally changing and unreliable cue. The polyterritoriality, cooperative harems, skewed sex ratio, and sexy-son hypotheses were all inadequate in explaining polygyny in harriers. Female choice of mated males among harriers is best explained by the deceitful provisioning of food by males.

Keywords

Nest Site Mate Choice Clutch Size Avian Species Female Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alatalo RV, Carlson A, Lundberg A, Ulfstrand S (1981) The conflict between male polygyny and female monogamy: the case of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Am Nat 117:738–753Google Scholar
  2. Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Stahlbrandt K (1982) Why do pied flycatcher females mate with already-mated males? Anim Behav 30:585–593Google Scholar
  3. Altalo RV, Lundberg A, Stahlbrandt K (1984) Female mate choice in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:253–261Google Scholar
  4. Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1986) The sexy-son hypothesis: data from the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 34:1454–1462Google Scholar
  5. Altenburg W, Daan S, Starkensburg J, Ziljstra M (1982) Polygamy in the marsh harrier, Circus aeruginosus: individual variation in hunting performance and number of mates. Behaviour 79:272–312Google Scholar
  6. Altmann SA, Wagner SS, Lenington S (1977) Two models for the evolution of polygyny. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:397–410Google Scholar
  7. Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804–816Google Scholar
  8. Armitage KB (1986) Marmot polygyny revisited: determinants of male and female reproductive strategies. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 303–331Google Scholar
  9. Baker JA, Brooks RJ (1981) Distribution patterns of raptors in relation to density of meadow voles. Condor 83:41–47Google Scholar
  10. Balfour E, Cadbury CJ (1979) Polygyny, spacing and sex ratio among Hen Harriers Circus cyaneus (L.) in Orkney. Ornis Scand 10:133–141Google Scholar
  11. Barnard PE, Simmons RE (1986) The functions of leg lowering in territorial predatory birds. Ostrich 57:107–109Google Scholar
  12. Bechard MJ (1982) Effects of vegetative cover on foraging site selection by Swainson's hawk. Condor 84:153–159Google Scholar
  13. Bildstein KL, Collopy MW (1985) Escorting flight and agonistic interactions in wintering Northern Harriers. Condor 87:398–401Google Scholar
  14. Burke CJ (1979) Effect of prey and land use on mating systems of harriers. MSc thesis, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  15. Catchpole C, Leisler B, Winkler H (1985) Polygyny in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:285–291Google Scholar
  16. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies NB (1985) Cooperation and conflict among dunnocks, Prunella modularis in a variable mating system. Anim Behav 33:628–648Google Scholar
  18. Dijkstra C, Vuursteen L, Daan S, Masman D (1982) Clutch size and laying date in the kestrel, Falco tinnunculus: effect of supplementary food. Ibis 124:210–213Google Scholar
  19. Elliot PF (1975) Longevity and the evolution of polygyny. Am Nat 109:281–287Google Scholar
  20. Garson PJ, Plescczynska WK, Holm C (1981) The polygyny threshold model: a reassessment. Can J Zool 59:902–910Google Scholar
  21. Gustafsson L (1985) Fitness factors in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis Temm. PhD thesis, Uppsala University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamerstrom F (1968) Ageing and sexing harriers. Inland Bird Banding News 40:143–146Google Scholar
  23. Hamerstrom F (1969) A harrier population study. In: Hickey JJ (ed) Peregrine Falcon populations: their biology and decline. Wisconsin University Press, Wisconsin, pp 367–383Google Scholar
  24. Hamerstrom F (1979) Effect of prey on predators: voles and harriers. Auk 96:370–374Google Scholar
  25. Hamerstrom F, Hamerstrom FN, Burke CJ (1985) Effect of voles on mating systems in a central Wisconsin population of harriers. Wilson Bull 97:332–346Google Scholar
  26. Heisler IL (1981) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: a new model for the “sexy-son” hypothesis. Am Nat 117:316–328Google Scholar
  27. Il'ichev VD, Bogoslovskaya LS, Barsova LI (1974) Neuronal organisation and homology of avian auditory centres. Doklady Biol Sci 218:1249–1252Google Scholar
  28. Kirkpatrick M (1985) Evolution of female choice and male parental care in polygynous species: the demise of the “sexy-son”. Am Nat 125:788–810Google Scholar
  29. Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favoured by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323Google Scholar
  30. Lenington S (1977) Evolution of polygyny in Redwinged Blackbirds. PhD thesis, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Lenington S (1980) Female choice and polygyny in Redwinged Blackbirds. Anim Behav 28:347–361Google Scholar
  32. MacWhirter RB (1985) Breeding ecology, prey selection and provisioning strategies of Northern Harriers Circus cyaneus (L.). BSc honours thesis. Mount Allison University, New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  33. McIleny EA (1940) Sex ratio in birds. Auk 57:85–93Google Scholar
  34. Møller AP (1986) Mating systems among European passerines: a review. Ibis 128:234–250Google Scholar
  35. Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. Poyser, BerkhamstedGoogle Scholar
  36. Newton I, Marquiss M (1981) Effects of additional food on laying dates and clutch sizes of sparrowhawks. Ornis Scand 12:224–229Google Scholar
  37. Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (1975) Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603Google Scholar
  39. Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166Google Scholar
  40. Picozzi N (1981) Weights, wing lengths and iris colour of Hen Harriers in Orkney. Bird Study 28:159–161Google Scholar
  41. Picozzi N (1984) Sex ratio, survival and territorial behaviour of polygynous Hen Harriers Circus c. cyaneus in Orkney. Ibis 126:356–365Google Scholar
  42. Plesczcynska WK (1978) Microgeographic prediction of polygyny in the Lark Bunting. Science 201:935–937Google Scholar
  43. Rice WR (1982) Acoustical location by the marsh hawk: adaptation to concealed prey. Auk 99:403–413Google Scholar
  44. Searcy WA (1979) Female choice of mates: A general model for birds and its application to Red-winged Blackbirds. Am Nat 114:77–100Google Scholar
  45. Searcy (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85Google Scholar
  46. Simmons RE (1983) Polygyny, ecology and mate choice of Northern Harriers Circus cyaneus (L.). MSc thesis Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  47. Simmons RE, Smith PC (1985) Do Northern Harriers (Circus cyaneus) choose nest sites adaptively? Can J Zool 63:494–498Google Scholar
  48. Simmons RE, Smith PC, MacWhirter RB (1986a) Hierarchies among Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) harems and the costs of polygyny. J Anim Ecol 55:755–772Google Scholar
  49. Simmons RE, MacWhirter RB, Barnard PE, Hansen GL (1986b) The influence of microtines on polygyny, productivity, age and provisioning of breeding Northern Harriers: a 5-year study. Can J Zool 64:2447–2456Google Scholar
  50. Simmons RE, Barnard PE, Smith PC (1987) Reproductive behaviour of Circus cyaneus in North America and Europe: a comparison. Ornis Scand 18:33–41Google Scholar
  51. Simmons RE (1988) Honest advertising, sexual selection, courtship displays, and body condition of polygynous male harriers. Auk 105:303–307Google Scholar
  52. Verner J (1964) The evolution of polygamy in the long-billed marsh wren. Evolution 18:252–261Google Scholar
  53. Village A (1985) Spring arrival times and assortative mating of Kestrels in south Scotland. J Anim Ecol 54:857–868Google Scholar
  54. von Haartman (1969) Nest-site and the evolution of polygamy in European passerine birds. Ornis Fenn 46:1–12Google Scholar
  55. Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: “the sexy-son hypothesis”. Am Nat 113:201–208Google Scholar
  56. Wittenberger JF (1976) The ecological factors selecting for polygyny in altricial birds. Am Nat 110:779–799Google Scholar
  57. Wittenberger JF (1980) Group size and polygamy in social mammals. Am Nat 115:197–222Google Scholar
  58. Wittenberger JF (1981) Time: a hidden dimension in the polygyny threshold model. Am Nat 118:803–822Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Simmons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyAcadia UniversityWolfvilleCanada

Personalised recommendations