Food and the deceptive acquisition of mates by polygynous male harriers
- 54 Downloads
- 18 Citations
Summary
Female northern harriers Circus cyaneus are polygynous, marsh-nesting raptors, whose mate choices are enigmatic. I determined the mate choice cues employed by females by correlating the order in which males were chosen with characters that 1) significantly influenced reproductive success; 2) were assessable prior to settlement; and 3) varied between breeding situations. Only nest sites and male provisioning performance met all these conditions: wet nest sites significantly (P<0.05) increased nest survival and high provisioning rates significantly (P<0.01) enhanced brood survival. The order in which females settled was strongly correlated with provisioning performance in both years (r s -0.65, and r s -0.84), but not with nest site quality. Females thus apperared to choose males principally on provisioning performance. Despite using the same cue, however, females choosing mated males reared only 0.28 young for every nestling raised by concurrently settling monogamous females (the lowest ratio recorded for any avian species). Extrapolation of male courtship provisioning patterns from clutch sizes and laying date indicated that females received similar proportions prior to and during egg-laying, but that males later preferentially fed α females. Secondary females therefore chose mated males on the basis of a temporally changing and unreliable cue. The polyterritoriality, cooperative harems, skewed sex ratio, and sexy-son hypotheses were all inadequate in explaining polygyny in harriers. Female choice of mated males among harriers is best explained by the deceitful provisioning of food by males.
Keywords
Nest Site Mate Choice Clutch Size Avian Species Female ChoicePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Alatalo RV, Carlson A, Lundberg A, Ulfstrand S (1981) The conflict between male polygyny and female monogamy: the case of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Am Nat 117:738–753Google Scholar
- Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Stahlbrandt K (1982) Why do pied flycatcher females mate with already-mated males? Anim Behav 30:585–593Google Scholar
- Altalo RV, Lundberg A, Stahlbrandt K (1984) Female mate choice in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:253–261Google Scholar
- Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1986) The sexy-son hypothesis: data from the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 34:1454–1462Google Scholar
- Altenburg W, Daan S, Starkensburg J, Ziljstra M (1982) Polygamy in the marsh harrier, Circus aeruginosus: individual variation in hunting performance and number of mates. Behaviour 79:272–312Google Scholar
- Altmann SA, Wagner SS, Lenington S (1977) Two models for the evolution of polygyny. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:397–410Google Scholar
- Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804–816Google Scholar
- Armitage KB (1986) Marmot polygyny revisited: determinants of male and female reproductive strategies. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 303–331Google Scholar
- Baker JA, Brooks RJ (1981) Distribution patterns of raptors in relation to density of meadow voles. Condor 83:41–47Google Scholar
- Balfour E, Cadbury CJ (1979) Polygyny, spacing and sex ratio among Hen Harriers Circus cyaneus (L.) in Orkney. Ornis Scand 10:133–141Google Scholar
- Barnard PE, Simmons RE (1986) The functions of leg lowering in territorial predatory birds. Ostrich 57:107–109Google Scholar
- Bechard MJ (1982) Effects of vegetative cover on foraging site selection by Swainson's hawk. Condor 84:153–159Google Scholar
- Bildstein KL, Collopy MW (1985) Escorting flight and agonistic interactions in wintering Northern Harriers. Condor 87:398–401Google Scholar
- Burke CJ (1979) Effect of prey and land use on mating systems of harriers. MSc thesis, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
- Catchpole C, Leisler B, Winkler H (1985) Polygyny in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:285–291Google Scholar
- Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Davies NB (1985) Cooperation and conflict among dunnocks, Prunella modularis in a variable mating system. Anim Behav 33:628–648Google Scholar
- Dijkstra C, Vuursteen L, Daan S, Masman D (1982) Clutch size and laying date in the kestrel, Falco tinnunculus: effect of supplementary food. Ibis 124:210–213Google Scholar
- Elliot PF (1975) Longevity and the evolution of polygyny. Am Nat 109:281–287Google Scholar
- Garson PJ, Plescczynska WK, Holm C (1981) The polygyny threshold model: a reassessment. Can J Zool 59:902–910Google Scholar
- Gustafsson L (1985) Fitness factors in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis Temm. PhD thesis, Uppsala University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- Hamerstrom F (1968) Ageing and sexing harriers. Inland Bird Banding News 40:143–146Google Scholar
- Hamerstrom F (1969) A harrier population study. In: Hickey JJ (ed) Peregrine Falcon populations: their biology and decline. Wisconsin University Press, Wisconsin, pp 367–383Google Scholar
- Hamerstrom F (1979) Effect of prey on predators: voles and harriers. Auk 96:370–374Google Scholar
- Hamerstrom F, Hamerstrom FN, Burke CJ (1985) Effect of voles on mating systems in a central Wisconsin population of harriers. Wilson Bull 97:332–346Google Scholar
- Heisler IL (1981) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: a new model for the “sexy-son” hypothesis. Am Nat 117:316–328Google Scholar
- Il'ichev VD, Bogoslovskaya LS, Barsova LI (1974) Neuronal organisation and homology of avian auditory centres. Doklady Biol Sci 218:1249–1252Google Scholar
- Kirkpatrick M (1985) Evolution of female choice and male parental care in polygynous species: the demise of the “sexy-son”. Am Nat 125:788–810Google Scholar
- Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favoured by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323Google Scholar
- Lenington S (1977) Evolution of polygyny in Redwinged Blackbirds. PhD thesis, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Lenington S (1980) Female choice and polygyny in Redwinged Blackbirds. Anim Behav 28:347–361Google Scholar
- MacWhirter RB (1985) Breeding ecology, prey selection and provisioning strategies of Northern Harriers Circus cyaneus (L.). BSc honours thesis. Mount Allison University, New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- McIleny EA (1940) Sex ratio in birds. Auk 57:85–93Google Scholar
- Møller AP (1986) Mating systems among European passerines: a review. Ibis 128:234–250Google Scholar
- Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. Poyser, BerkhamstedGoogle Scholar
- Newton I, Marquiss M (1981) Effects of additional food on laying dates and clutch sizes of sparrowhawks. Ornis Scand 12:224–229Google Scholar
- Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (1975) Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603Google Scholar
- Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166Google Scholar
- Picozzi N (1981) Weights, wing lengths and iris colour of Hen Harriers in Orkney. Bird Study 28:159–161Google Scholar
- Picozzi N (1984) Sex ratio, survival and territorial behaviour of polygynous Hen Harriers Circus c. cyaneus in Orkney. Ibis 126:356–365Google Scholar
- Plesczcynska WK (1978) Microgeographic prediction of polygyny in the Lark Bunting. Science 201:935–937Google Scholar
- Rice WR (1982) Acoustical location by the marsh hawk: adaptation to concealed prey. Auk 99:403–413Google Scholar
- Searcy WA (1979) Female choice of mates: A general model for birds and its application to Red-winged Blackbirds. Am Nat 114:77–100Google Scholar
- Searcy (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85Google Scholar
- Simmons RE (1983) Polygyny, ecology and mate choice of Northern Harriers Circus cyaneus (L.). MSc thesis Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Simmons RE, Smith PC (1985) Do Northern Harriers (Circus cyaneus) choose nest sites adaptively? Can J Zool 63:494–498Google Scholar
- Simmons RE, Smith PC, MacWhirter RB (1986a) Hierarchies among Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) harems and the costs of polygyny. J Anim Ecol 55:755–772Google Scholar
- Simmons RE, MacWhirter RB, Barnard PE, Hansen GL (1986b) The influence of microtines on polygyny, productivity, age and provisioning of breeding Northern Harriers: a 5-year study. Can J Zool 64:2447–2456Google Scholar
- Simmons RE, Barnard PE, Smith PC (1987) Reproductive behaviour of Circus cyaneus in North America and Europe: a comparison. Ornis Scand 18:33–41Google Scholar
- Simmons RE (1988) Honest advertising, sexual selection, courtship displays, and body condition of polygynous male harriers. Auk 105:303–307Google Scholar
- Verner J (1964) The evolution of polygamy in the long-billed marsh wren. Evolution 18:252–261Google Scholar
- Village A (1985) Spring arrival times and assortative mating of Kestrels in south Scotland. J Anim Ecol 54:857–868Google Scholar
- von Haartman (1969) Nest-site and the evolution of polygamy in European passerine birds. Ornis Fenn 46:1–12Google Scholar
- Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: “the sexy-son hypothesis”. Am Nat 113:201–208Google Scholar
- Wittenberger JF (1976) The ecological factors selecting for polygyny in altricial birds. Am Nat 110:779–799Google Scholar
- Wittenberger JF (1980) Group size and polygamy in social mammals. Am Nat 115:197–222Google Scholar
- Wittenberger JF (1981) Time: a hidden dimension in the polygyny threshold model. Am Nat 118:803–822Google Scholar