Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 247–256

Foragers of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei: a disposable caste?

  • Sanford D. Porter
  • Clive D. Jorgensen


  1. 1.

    Exterior workers of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei, were subdivided into forager, defender and refuse worker behavior roles (Fig. 2). Exterior workers comprised approximately 16% of the total colony population with interior workers comprising the remainder.

  2. 2.

    An average of less than 10% of the total worker population foraged (Table 1). Studies of role changes comfirmed a general one-way progression from interior workers to defenders to foragers (Fig. 5). The average longevity of foragers was about 14 days. As interior workers progressed toward foraging, their dry weights declined approximately 40% (Fig. 3) and mandible wear increased (Table 2).

  3. 3.

    Based on these results, we propose that P. owyheei has evolved a disposable forager strategy that tolerates high forager mortality. The large reservoir of interior workers required by this strategy may also inhibit the evolution of physically specialized interior worker castes.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayre GL (1962) Problems in using the Lincoln Index for estimating the size of ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J NY Entomol Soc 70:159–166Google Scholar
  2. Bailey NTJ (1951) On estimating the size of mobile populations from recapture data. Biometrika 38:293–306Google Scholar
  3. Brian MV, Abbott A (1977) The control of food flow in a society of the ant Myrmica rubra L. Anim Behav 25:1047–1055Google Scholar
  4. Chapman DG, Junge CO (1956) The estimation of the size of a stratified animal population. Ann Math Stat 27:375–389Google Scholar
  5. Clark WH, Comanor PL (1975) Removal of annual plants from the desert ecosystem by western harvester ants. Environ Entomol 4:52–56Google Scholar
  6. Darroch JN (1961) The two-sample capture-recapture census when tagging and sampling are stratified. Biometrika 48:241–260Google Scholar
  7. Dethier VG (1976) The hungry fly: A physiological study of the behavior associated with feeding. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vita J (1979) Mechanisms of interference and foraging among colonies of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 60:729–737Google Scholar
  9. Erickson JM (1972) Mark-recapture techniques for population estimates of Pogonomyrmex ant colonies: An evaluation of the 32P technique. Ann Entomol Soc Am 65:57–61Google Scholar
  10. Evans HE (1962) A review of nesting behavior of digger wasps of the genus Aphilanthops, with special attention to the mechanics of prey carriage. Behaviour 19:239–260Google Scholar
  11. Feeny PP (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  12. Gentry JB (1974) Response to predation by colonies of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 55:1328–1338Google Scholar
  13. Gentry JB, Stiritz KL (1972) The role of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius, in old field mineral nutrient relationships. Environ Entomol 1:39–41Google Scholar
  14. Golley FB, Gentry JB (1964) Bioenergetics of the southern harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 45:217–225Google Scholar
  15. Higashi S (1974) Worker polyethism related with body size in a polydomous red wood ant, Formica (Formica) yessensis Forel. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser 6 19:695–705Google Scholar
  16. Hölldobler B (1970) Steatoda fulva (Theridiidae), a spider that feeds on harvester ants. Psyche 77:202–208Google Scholar
  17. Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:3–44Google Scholar
  18. Jorgensen CD (1979) Raft River environmental report. Report to EG&G Idaho, Inc. and Department of Energy (no pagination)Google Scholar
  19. Jorgensen CD, Porter SD (in press) Foraging behavior of Pogonomyrmex owyheei in southeast Idaho. Environ EntomolGoogle Scholar
  20. Knowlton GF (1974a) Arthropod food of Curlew Valley lizards. Utah St Univ Ecol Ctr, Terrestrial Arthropod Ser 7Google Scholar
  21. Knowlton GF (1974b) Some terrestrial arthropod food of Curlew Valley birds. Utah St Univ Ecol Ctr, Terrestrial Arthropod Ser 8Google Scholar
  22. Kruk-de Bruin M, Röst LCM, Draisma FGAM (1977) Estimates of the number of foraging ants with the Lincoln-index method in relation to the colony size of Formica polyctena. J Anim Ecol 46:457–470Google Scholar
  23. Lavigne RJ (1969) Bionomics and nest structure of Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:1166–1175Google Scholar
  24. Lewis T, Pollard GV, Dibley GC (1974) Rhythmic foraging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes (L.) (Formicidae: Attini). J Anim Ecol 43:129–141Google Scholar
  25. Mirenda JT, Vinson SB (1981) Division of labour and specification of castes in the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. Anim Behav 29:410–420Google Scholar
  26. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Pianka ER, Parker WS (1975) Ecology of horned lizards: A review with special reference to Phrynosoma platyrhinos. Copeia 1975:141–162Google Scholar
  28. Porter SD, Eastmond DA (in press) Euryopis coki (Theridiidae), a spider that preys on Pogonomyrmex ants. J ArachnolGoogle Scholar
  29. Porter SD, Jorgensen CD (1980) Recapture studies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei Cole, using a fluorescent marking technique. Ecol Entomol 5:263–269Google Scholar
  30. Rogers LE (1974) Foraging activity of the western harvester ant in the shortgrass plains ecosystem. Environ Entomol 3:420–424Google Scholar
  31. Rogers LE, Lavigne RJ, Miller JL (1972) Bioenergetics of the western harverster ant in the shortgrass plains ecosystem. Environ Entomol 1:763–768Google Scholar
  32. Rosengren R (1977) Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group) I. Age polyethism and topographic traditions. Acta Zool Fern 149:1–30Google Scholar
  33. Schaefer MB (1951) Estimation of size of animal populations by marking experiments. US Fish Wild Serv Fish Bull 69:191–203Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt JO, Blum MS (1978) A harvester ant venom: Chemistry and pharmacology. Science 200:1064–1066Google Scholar
  35. Sharp LA, Barr WF (1960) Preliminary investigations of harvester ants on southern Idaho rangelands. J Range Manage 13:131–134Google Scholar
  36. Sneva FA (1979) The western harvester ants: Their density and hill size in relation to herbaceous productivity and big sagebrush cover. J Range Manage 32:46–47Google Scholar
  37. Stoffolano JG (1973) Effect of age and diapause on the mean impulse frequency and failure to generate impulse in labellar chemoreceptor sensilla of Phormia regina. J Gerontol 28:35–39Google Scholar
  38. Traniello JFA (1977) Recruitment behavior, orientation and the organization of foraging in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus DeGeer (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:61–79Google Scholar
  39. Weir JS (1958) Polyethism in workers of the ant Myrmica, part II. Insectes Soc 5:315–339Google Scholar
  40. Whitford WG, Bryant M (1979) Behavior of a predator and its prey: The horned lizard (Phrynosoma cornutum) and harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.). Ecology 60:686–694Google Scholar
  41. Whitford WG, Ettershank G (1975) Factors affecting foraging activity in Chihuahuan Desert harvester ants. Environ Entomol 4:689–696Google Scholar
  42. Whitford WG, Kay CA, Schumacher AM (1975) Water loss in Chihuahuan desert ants. Physiol Zool 48:390–397Google Scholar
  43. Willard JR, Crowell HH (1965) Biological activities of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei, in central Oregon. J Econ Entomol 58:484–489Google Scholar
  44. Wilson EO (1953) The origin and evolution of polymorphism in ants. Q Rev Biol 28:136–156Google Scholar
  45. Wilson EO (1968) The ergonomics of caste in the social insects. Am Nat 102:41–66Google Scholar
  46. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson EO, Eisner T (1957) Quantitative studies of liquid food transmission in ants. Insectes Soc 4:157–166Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanford D. Porter
    • 1
  • Clive D. Jorgensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations