Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 291–302

Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization

II. Tropical forest habitats
  • Ken Marten
  • Douglas Quine
  • Peter Marler
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Attenuation of white noise and pure tones from 350 Hz to 10 kHz was measured at three secondary forest sites in Panama at different stages of maturity. Graphs of excess attenuation (E.A.) versus frequency were obtained near ground level, and at heights of 1, 2, 5, 10, and 12 m in each habitat.

     
  2. 2.

    The pattern of E.A. vs. frequency was similar for all habitats. For all heights other than ground level and 1 m the lower the frequency the better the sound carried. Sounds below 2 kHz were attenuated by a ground effect if the source was 1 m or less from the ground. Consequently there was a minimum of E.A. in all three habitats between 500 Hz and 2 kHz at ground level and 1 m.

     
  3. 3.

    Relevance of the data to assessment of the role of environmental variables in the natural selection of vocalization for long-distance transmission is discussed. Two facts mitigating against Morton's sound “window” as an explanation for lower frequencies in songs of forest as opposed to open country birds are presence of similar “windows” in both habitats and restriction of windows to a zone close to the ground in most habitats.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aylor, D.: Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 51, 197–205 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeumer, E.: Lebensart des Haushahns, dritter Teil — über seine Laute und allgemeine Ergänzungen. Z. Tierpsychol. 19, 394–416 (1962)Google Scholar
  3. Busnel, R.G., Gramet, P.: Recherches préliminaires sur le comportement acoustique de Quelea quelea quelea Latham en captivité. Bull. I.F.A.N. 18, 280–326 (1956)Google Scholar
  4. Chappuis, C.: Un exemple de l'influence du milieu sur les emissions vocales des oiseaux: l'evolution des chants en foret equitoriale. Terre et Vie 25, 183–202 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Collias, N.E.: A spectrographic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the African Village Weaverbird. Cordor 65, 517–527 (1963)Google Scholar
  6. Embleton, T.F.W., Piercy, J.E., Olson, N.: Outdoor sound propagation over ground of finite impedance. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 59, 267–277 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gautier, J.P.: Etude morphologique et fonctionelle des annexes estralaryngees des cercopithecinae; liason avec les cris d'espacement. Biological Gabonica 7, 229–267 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. Green, S.: Variation of vocal pattern with social situation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): A field study. In: Primate behavior, Vol. 4 (ed. L.A. Rosenblum), pp. 1–102. New York. Academic Press 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin, D.R.: The importance of atmospheric attenuation for the echolocation of bats (Chiroptera). Anim. Behav. 19, 55–61 (1971)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ingard, U.: On the reflection of a spherical sound wave from an infinite plane. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 23, 329–335 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ingard, U.: A review of the influence of meteorological conditions on sound propagation. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 25, 405–411 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Konishi, M.: The role of auditory feedback in the vocal behavior of the domestic fowl. Z. Tierpsychol. 20, 349–367 (1963)Google Scholar
  13. Konishi, M.: Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds. Z. vergl. Physiol. 66, 257–272 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marler, P.: Tonal quality of bird sounds. In: Bird vocalizations (ed. R.A. Hinde), pp. 5–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1969Google Scholar
  15. Marler, P.: A comparison of vocalizations of red-tailed monkeys and blue monkeys, Ceropithecus ascanius and C. mitis, in Uganda. Z. Tierpsychol. 33, 223–247 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marler, P.: Animal communication. In: Non-verbal communication. Advances in the study of communication and affect, Vol. 1 (eds. L. Krames, T. Pliner, T. Alloway), pp. 25–50. New York: Plenum Press 1974Google Scholar
  17. Marler, P., Hobbet, L.: Individuality in a long-range vocalization of wild chimpanzees. Z. Tierpsychol. 38, 97–109 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marler, P., Mundinger, P.: Vocalizations, social organization and breeding biology of the twite, Acanthus flavirostris. bis 117, 1–17 (1975)Google Scholar
  19. Marler, P., Tenaza, R.: Signalling behavior of wild apes, with special reference to vocalization. In: How animals communicate (ed. T. Sebeok), Bloomington: Indiana University Press (in press) (1977)Google Scholar
  20. Marten, K., Marler, P.: Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitat s. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 271–290 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayfield, H.: Hearing loss and birdsong. Living Bird, 167–175 (1966)Google Scholar
  22. Morton, E.S.: Ecological sources of selection on avian sound. Ph.D. diss. Yale University (1970)Google Scholar
  23. Morton, E.S.: Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Amer. Natur. 108, 17–34 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sokal, R.F., Rohlf, F.J.: Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. San Francisco: Freeman 1969Google Scholar
  25. Waser, P., Waser, M.S.: Experimental studies of primate vocalization: Specializations for long distance propagation. Z. Tierpsychol. (in press) (1977)Google Scholar
  26. Wiener, F.M., Keast, D.N.: Experimental study of propagation of sound over ground. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 31, 724–733 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiley, R.H., Richards, D.G.: Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere. (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Marten
    • 1
  • Douglas Quine
    • 1
  • Peter Marler
    • 1
  1. 1.The Rockefeller UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Langmuir LaboratoryCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations