Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 153–160 | Cite as

Biochemical determination of parental uncertainty in white-fronted bee-eaters

  • Peter H. Wrege
  • Stephen T. Emlen
Article

Summary

Maternity and paternity uncertainty represent important costs to breeders among white-fronted bee-eaters (Merops bullockoides) in Kenya. Analysis of enzyme polymorphisms reveals that between 9% and 12% of all offspring are genetically unrelated to one or both of their putative parents. These ‘bastards’ are the result of three different sources of parental uncertainty: Extrapair copulation, intraspecific egg parasitism, and quasi-parasitism (parasitism by a female who was fertilized by the male attending the parasitized nest). The first two represent costs to males, who rear offspring that are not genetically their own; the latter two produce the same costs for females. Genetic relatedness plays an important role in defining the social structure of M. bullockoides populations. In order to predict patterns of parental investment and the choice of recipients for helping behavior, one would like to know the relative frequency of maternity vs paternity uncertainty. The possible use of maximum likelihood techniques to separate the sources of non-kin is discussed. Unfortunately, the sample size of detected non-kin in the present study was not large enough to allow constructive use of the technique for bee-eaters. A comparison of estimates from biochemical and behavioral analyses indicates that both methods can produce misleading results. Behavioral data can be used to test underlying assumptions of biochemical analyses, and vice-versa. Used together, the two approaches reinforce one another and strengthen the reliability of conclusions drawn from either one alone.

Keywords

Social Structure Relative Frequency Biochemical Analysis Behavioral Data Genetic Relatedness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RD (1979) Darwinism and human affairs. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M (1984) Brood parasitism within species. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and Scroungers: Strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Croom Helm, London, pp 195–227Google Scholar
  4. Avala FJ, Hedgecock D, Bumwalt GS, Valentine FW (1973) Genetic variation in Tradacna maxima, an ecological analog of some unsuccessful lineages. Evolution 27:177–191Google Scholar
  5. Brown CR (1984) Laying eggs in a neighbor's nest: Benefit and cost of colonial nesting in swallows. Science 224:518–519Google Scholar
  6. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer F (1971) The genetics of human populations. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Clayton JW, Tretiak DN (1972) Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J Fish Res Board Canada 29:1169–1172Google Scholar
  8. Emlen ST (1981) Altruism, kinship and reciprocity in the white-fronted bee-eater. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 217–230Google Scholar
  9. Emlen ST, Demong NJ (1984) Bee-eaters of Baharini. Nat Hist 10:50–59Google Scholar
  10. Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1986) Forced copulations and intra-specific parasitism: Two costs of social living in the white-fronted bee-eater. Ethology 71:2–29Google Scholar
  11. Ford NL (1983) Variation in mate fidelity in monogamous birds. In: Johnston RF (ed) Current ornithology, Vol 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp 329–356Google Scholar
  12. Gowaty PA (1985) Multiple parentage and apparent monogamy in birds. In: Gowaty PA, Mock DW (eds) Avian Monogamy, Ornithological Monographs, American Ornithologists' Union, pp 11–21Google Scholar
  13. Gowaty PA, Karlin AA (1984) Multiple maternity and paternity in single broods of apparently monogamous eastern blue-birds (Sialia sialis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:91–95Google Scholar
  14. Harris H, Hopkinson DA (1976) Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. American, ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  15. Hegner RE, Emlen ST, Demong NJ (1982) Spatial organization of the white-fronted bee-eater. Nature 298:264–266Google Scholar
  16. Lewontin RC (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsden JE, May B (1984) Feather pulp: A non-destructive sampling technique for electrophoretic studies of birds. Auk 101:173–175Google Scholar
  18. May B, Wright JE, Stoneking M (1979) Joint segregation of biochemical loci in salmonidae: Results from experiments with Salvelimus and review of the literature on other species. J Fish Res Board Canada 36:1114–1126Google Scholar
  19. McCracken GF (1984) Communal nursing in Mexican freetailed bat maternity colonies. Science 223:1090–1091Google Scholar
  20. McCracken GF, Bradbury JW (1977) Paternity and genetic heterogeneity in the polygynous bat, Phyllostomus hastatus. Science 198:303–306Google Scholar
  21. McKinney F, Derrickson SR, Mineau P (1983) Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behaviour 86:250–294Google Scholar
  22. McKinney F, Cheng KM, Bruggers DJ (1984) Forced copulation in wpparently monogamous birds. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 523–545Google Scholar
  23. Ridley M (1978) Paternal care. Anim Behav 26:904–930Google Scholar
  24. Selander RK, Smith MH, Yang SY, Johnson WE, Gentry JB (1971) IV. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI. Univ Texas Publ 7103Google Scholar
  25. Sherman PW (1981) Electrophoresis and avian genealogical analyses. Auk 98:419–422Google Scholar
  26. Trivers RD (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man. Chicago, Aldine, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  27. Westneat DF (1987) Extra-pair fertilizations in a predominately monogamous bird: genetic evidence. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Yom-Tov Y (1980) Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Biol Rev 55:93–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter H. Wrege
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephen T. Emlen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.National Museums of KenyaNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations