Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 299–305 | Cite as

The mechanism of nestmate discrimination in social wasps (Polistes, Hymenoptera: Vespidae)

  • David W. Pfennig
  • George J. Gamboa
  • Hudson K. Reeve
  • Jan Shellman Reeve
  • I. Deanna Ferguson
Article

Summary

Laboratory studies of nestmate recognition (250.0 h of behavioral observation) were conducted on two species of paper wasps (Polistes). Gynes of P. carolina isolated from their natal nest and nestmates at emergence later failed to recognize nestmates, but gynes previously exposed only to their natal nest for 2 h recognized nestmates. Gynes of P. fuscatus previously (1) exposed to their natal nest and nestmates for at least 5d, (2) exposed only to their natal nest for 4.16–13.5 h and (3) exposed only to their natal nest for 1 h, all discriminated nestmates from non-nestmates. Thus, exposure to the natal nest is a sufficient condition for the ontogeny of nestmate recognition ability. Unrelated gynes of P. fuscatus, previously exposed to different fragments of the same but unrelated nest, also recognized each other. These results, together with the evidence from other recent studies, indicate that the mechanism of nestmate discrimination in Polistes has the following attributes. Recognition cues are (1) learned, (2) learned in the adult stage, (3) learned within a few hours of emergence with memories of these cues being durable if not permanent; thus, learning of recognition cues resembles imprinting; (4) Recognition cues are learned from the natal nest and/or brood and not from adult nestmates, (5) they cannot be visual, tactile, or auditory features of adult nestmates and thus are probably chemical, and (6) they can be both learned and acquired from a nest and/or its brood.

Keywords

Laboratory Study Adult Stage Behavioral Observation Recognition Ability Natal Nest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen JL, Schulze-Kellman K, Gamboa GJ (1982) Clumping patterns during overwintering in the paper wasp, Polistes exciamans: effects of relatedness. J Kans Entomol Soc 55:97–100Google Scholar
  2. Bornais KM, Larch CM, Gamboa GJ, Daily RB (1983) Nestmate discrimination among laboratory overwintered foundresses of the paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Can Entomol 115:655–658Google Scholar
  3. Buckle GR (1982) Differentiation of queens and nestmate interactions in newly established colonies of Lasioglassum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Sociobiology 7:8–20Google Scholar
  4. Buckle GR, Greenberg L (1981) Nestmate recognition in sweat bees (Lasioglossum zephyrum): does an individual recognize its own odour or only odours of its nestmates? Anim Behav 29:802–809Google Scholar
  5. Gamboa GJ, Dew HE (1981) Intracolonial communication by body oscillations in the paper wasp, Polistes metricus. Insectes Soc 28:13–26Google Scholar
  6. Haggard CM, Gamboa GJ (1980) Seasonal variation in body size and reproductive condition of a paper wasp, Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Can Entomol 112:239–248Google Scholar
  7. Hangartner W, Reichson JM, Wilson EO (1970) Orientation to nest material by the ant, Pogonomyrex badius (Latreille). Anim Behav 18:331–334Google Scholar
  8. Hölldobler B, Michener CD (1980) Mechanisms of identification and discrimination in social Hymenoptera. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim (Dahlem Konferenzen 1980, pp 35–58)Google Scholar
  9. Hubbard MD (1974) Influence of nest material and colony odor on digging in the ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Georgia Entomol Soc 9:127–132Google Scholar
  10. Klahn JE (1979) Philopatric and non-philopatric foundress associations in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:417–424Google Scholar
  11. Kukuk PF, Breed MD, Sotbi A, Bell WJ (1977) The contributions of kinship and conditioning to nest recognition and colony member recognition in a primitively eusocial bee, Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halicitidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:319–327Google Scholar
  12. Larch CM, Gamboa GJ (1981) Investigation of mating preference for nestmates in the paper wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 54:811–814Google Scholar
  13. Noonan KM (1979) PhD dissertation, Department of Zoology, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  14. Pfennig DW, Reeve HK, Shellman JS (1983) Learned component of nestmate discrimination in workers of a social wasp, Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Anim Behav 31:412–416Google Scholar
  15. Post DC, Jeanne RL (1981) Colony defense against ants by Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Wisconsin. J Kans Entomol Soc 54:599–615Google Scholar
  16. Post DC, Jeanne RL (1982) Recognition of former nestmates during colony founding by the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:283–285Google Scholar
  17. Ross NM, Gamboa GJ (1981) Nestmate discrimination in social wasps (Polistes metricus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:163–165Google Scholar
  18. Ryan RE, Forbes GC, Gamboa GJ (1983) Male social wasps fail to recognize their brothers (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kans Entomol Soc (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Shellman JS, Gamboa GJ (1982) Nestmate discrimination in social wasps: the role of exposure to nest and nestmates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:51–53Google Scholar
  20. West Eberhard MJ (1969) The social biology of polistine wasps. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Mich 140:1–101Google Scholar
  21. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. The Belkap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Pfennig
    • 1
  • George J. Gamboa
    • 2
  • Hudson K. Reeve
    • 2
  • Jan Shellman Reeve
    • 2
  • I. Deanna Ferguson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsSouthwest Foundation for Research and EducationSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesOakland UniversityRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations