Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 211–224 | Cite as

Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata

  • Joshua J. Schwartz
  • Kentwood D. Wells
Article

Summary

Hyla ebraccata, H. microcephala and H. phlebodes commonly occur together in Panama. The three species have calls exhibiting broad frequency overlap and call during the same season and time of day from similar microhabitats, frequently in close proximity. The vocal repertoires of the three species are structurally and functionally similar. All employ multi-part advertisement and aggressive calls which consist of a primary note followed by a variable number of clicks. H. ebraccata males often responded to heterospecific calls with multi-note synchronized responses, and calls with primary notes greater than 150–200 ms were most effective in eliciting synchrony. Playback experiments with synthetic 1-note advertisement calls of different durations and both synthetic 1-note advertisement calls and 200 ms tones of different frequencies demonstrated that H. ebraccata males will synchronize with stimuli which are similar in frequency and duration to conspecific calls. Data from a two-choice experiment with female H. ebraccata demonstrate that calls of individual H. microcephala can reduce the attractiveness of a H. ebraccata male's calls if primary notes overlap. By synchronizing response calls to those of H. microcephala, a H. ebraccata may reduce the chances that his calls are rendered less attractive to potential mates.

Aggressive calls of these species are graded and are characterized by higher pulse repetition rates and often longer durations than advertisement calls. H. ebraccata males respond to aggressive calls of H. microcephala and H. phlebodes as they do to their own calls. Heterospecific aggressive interactions probably occur because the species interfere acoustically. Our results demonstrate that H. ebraccata males behave in ways which enhance their ability to communicate in a noisy assemblage of conspecific and heterospecific males.

Keywords

Potential Mate Pulse Repetition Rate High Pulse Aggressive Interaction Playback Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken RB (1982) Effects of group density on call rate, phonokinesis, and mating success in Palmacorixa nana (Heteroptera: Corixidae). Can J Zool 60:1665–1672Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimental D (ed) Insects, science, and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77Google Scholar
  3. Allan DM (1973) Some relationships of vocalizations to behavior in the Pacific treefrog, Hyla regilla. Herpetologica 29:366–371Google Scholar
  4. Awbrey FT (1978) Social interaction among chorusing Pacific treefrogs, Hyla regilla. Copeia 1978:208–214Google Scholar
  5. Blair WF (1974) Character displacement in frogs. Am Zool 14:1119–1125Google Scholar
  6. Brzoska J (1982) Vocal response of male European water frogs (Rana esculenta complex) to mating and territorial calls. Behav Proc 7:37–47Google Scholar
  7. Brown RN (1977) Character convergence in bird song. Can J Zool 55:1523–1529Google Scholar
  8. Cardoso AJ (1981) Organização espacial e temporal na reprodução e vida larva' ria em uma comunidade de hili' deos no sudeste do Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Unpublished Masters Thesis, Univ Est CampinasGoogle Scholar
  9. Cody ML (1974) Competition and the structure of bird communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Draper N, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, second edition. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Drewry G (1970) The role of amphibians in the ecology of Puerto Rican rain forest. In: Puerto Rico Nuclear Center Rain Forest Annual Report. Puerto Rico Nuclear Center, San Juan, pp 16–85Google Scholar
  12. Duellman WE (1970) The hylid frogs of Middle America. Univ Kansas Press, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebersole JP (1977) The adaptive significance of interspecific territoriality in the reef fish Eupomacentrus leucostictus. Ecology 58:914–920Google Scholar
  14. Ficken RW, Ficken MS, Hailman JP (1974) Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183:762–763Google Scholar
  15. Fouquette MJ Jr (1960) Isolating mechanisms in three sympatric treefrogs in the canal zone. Evolution 14:484–497Google Scholar
  16. Gambs RD, Littlejohn MJ (1979) Acoustic behavior of males of the Rio Grande leopard frog (Rana berlandieri): an experimental analysis through field playback trials. Copeia 1979:643–650Google Scholar
  17. Gerhardt HC (1974) The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cierea). J Exp Biol 61:229–241Google Scholar
  18. Gerhardt HC (1978) Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): the significance of some fine-temporal properties. J Exp Biol 74:59–73Google Scholar
  19. Gerhardt HC (1981a) Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): Importance of two frequency bands as a function of sound pressure level. J Comp Physiol 144:9–16Google Scholar
  20. Gerhardt HC (1981b) Mating call recognition in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa): Responses to synthetic calls and comparisons with the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J Comp Physiol 144:17–25Google Scholar
  21. Gerhardt HC (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): implications for mate choice. Am Zool 22:581–595Google Scholar
  22. Gochfeld M (1979) Interspecific territoriality in red-breasted meadowlarks and a method for estimating the mutuality of their participation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:159–170Google Scholar
  23. Hultsch H, Todt D (1982) Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:253–260Google Scholar
  24. Jones MDR (1966) The acoustic behavior of the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. I. Alternation, synchronism and rivalry between males. J Exp Biol 45:15–30Google Scholar
  25. Latimer W (1981) Acoustic competition in bush crickets. Ecol Entomol 6:35–45Google Scholar
  26. Lemon RE, Struger J (1980) Acoustic entrainment to randomly generated calls by the frog, Hyla crucifer. J Acoust Soc Am 2090–2095Google Scholar
  27. Littlejohn MJ (1977) Long-range acoustic communication in anurans: an integrated and evolutionary approach. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 263–294Google Scholar
  28. Littlejohn MJ, Martin AA (1969) Acoustic interactions between two species of leptodactylid frogs. Anim Behav 17:785–791Google Scholar
  29. Loftus-Hills JJ (1974) Analysis of an acoustic pacemaker in Strecker's chorus frog, Pseudacris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae). J Comp Physiol 90:75–87Google Scholar
  30. MacNally RC (1982) Ecological, behavioural, and energy dynamics of two sympatric species of Ranidella (Anura). Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  31. Moynihan M (1968) Social mimicry; character convergence versus character displacement. Evolution 22:315–331Google Scholar
  32. Murray BG (1976) A critique of interspecific territoriality and character convergence. Condor 78:518–525Google Scholar
  33. Murray BG (1981) The origins of adaptive interspecific territorialism. Biol Rev 56:1–22Google Scholar
  34. Myrberg AA Jr., Thresher AE (1974) Interspecific aggression and its relevance to the concept of territoriality in reef fishes. Am Zool 14:81–96Google Scholar
  35. Narins PM (1982) Behavioral refractory period in neotropical treefrogs. J Comp Physiol 148:337–344Google Scholar
  36. Narins PM, Capranica RR (1978) Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrog Eleutherodactylus coqui. J Comp Physiol 127:1–9Google Scholar
  37. Orians GH, Willson MF (1964) Interspecific territories of birds. Ecology 45:736–745Google Scholar
  38. Ortiz PR, Jenssen TA (1982) Interspecific aggression between lizard competitors, Anolis cooki and Anolis cristatellus. Z Tierpsychol 60:227–238Google Scholar
  39. Paillette M (1970) La notion de territoire chez les amphibiens anoures, et plus particulierement la valeur des emissions sonores dans le compartement territorial des hylides: Hyla arborea et Hyla meridionalis. In: Richard G (ed) Territoire et domaine vital. Masson, Paris, pp 35–48Google Scholar
  40. Passmore NI (1978) The vocalizations and aspects of the reproductive behaviour of the genus Ptychadena in South Africa. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Witwatersrand, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  41. Pengilley RK (1971) Calling and associated behavior of some species of Pseudophryne (Anura: Leptodactylidae). J Zool (Lond) 163:73–92Google Scholar
  42. Rosen M, Lemon RE (1974) The vocal behavior os spring peepers, Hyla crucifer. Copeia 1974:940–950Google Scholar
  43. Samways MJ, Broughton WB (1976) Song modification in the Orthoptera. II. Types of acoustic interaction between Platycleis intermedia and other species of the genus (Tettigoniidae). Physiol Entomol 1:287–297Google Scholar
  44. Savage JM, Heyer WR (1969) The tree-frogs (Family Hylidae) of Costa Rica: diagnosis and distribution. Rev Biol Trop 16:1–127Google Scholar
  45. Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983a) An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs. Anim Behav 31:181–190Google Scholar
  46. Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983b) The influence of background noise on the behavior of a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata. Herpetologica 39:121–129Google Scholar
  47. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith RL (1973) Aspects of the biology of three species of the genus Rhantus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) with special reference to the acoustical behaviour of two. Can J Entomol 105:909–920Google Scholar
  49. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  50. Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ (1982) The role of synchronized calling, ambient light, and ambient noise, in anit-bat-predator behavior of a treefrog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:125–131Google Scholar
  51. Walkowiak W, Brzoska J (1982) Signififance of spectral and temporal call parameters in the auditory communication of male grass frogs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:247–252Google Scholar
  52. Walters J (1979) Interspecific aggressive behaviour by long-toed lapwings (Vanellus crassirostris). Anim Behav 27:969–981Google Scholar
  53. Wasserman FE (1977) Intraspecific acoustical interference in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicolis). Anim Behav 25:949–952Google Scholar
  54. Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693Google Scholar
  55. Wells KD (1980) Behavioral ecology and social organization of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus inguinalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:199–209Google Scholar
  56. Wells KD, Greer BJ (1981) Vocal responses to conspecific calls in a neotropical hylid frog, Hyla ebraccata. Copeia 1981:615–624Google Scholar
  57. Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (1984a) Vocal communication in a neotropical frog, Hyla ebraccata: Advertisement calls. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  58. Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (1984b) Vocal communication in a neotropical frog, Hyla ebraccata: Aggressive calls. Behaviour (in press)Google Scholar
  59. Whitney CL, Krebs JR (1975) Spacing and calling in Pacific treefrogs, Hyla regilla. Can J Zool 53:1519–1527Google Scholar
  60. Wiewandt TA (1969) Vocalizations, aggressive behavior, and territoriality in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1969:276–285Google Scholar
  61. Zelick RD, Narins PM (1982) Analysis of acoustically evoked call suppression behavior in a neotropical treefrog. Anim Behav 30:728–733Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua J. Schwartz
    • 1
  • Kentwood D. Wells
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Sciences GroupThe University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations