Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata
- 118 Downloads
- 57 Citations
Summary
Hyla ebraccata, H. microcephala and H. phlebodes commonly occur together in Panama. The three species have calls exhibiting broad frequency overlap and call during the same season and time of day from similar microhabitats, frequently in close proximity. The vocal repertoires of the three species are structurally and functionally similar. All employ multi-part advertisement and aggressive calls which consist of a primary note followed by a variable number of clicks. H. ebraccata males often responded to heterospecific calls with multi-note synchronized responses, and calls with primary notes greater than 150–200 ms were most effective in eliciting synchrony. Playback experiments with synthetic 1-note advertisement calls of different durations and both synthetic 1-note advertisement calls and 200 ms tones of different frequencies demonstrated that H. ebraccata males will synchronize with stimuli which are similar in frequency and duration to conspecific calls. Data from a two-choice experiment with female H. ebraccata demonstrate that calls of individual H. microcephala can reduce the attractiveness of a H. ebraccata male's calls if primary notes overlap. By synchronizing response calls to those of H. microcephala, a H. ebraccata may reduce the chances that his calls are rendered less attractive to potential mates.
Aggressive calls of these species are graded and are characterized by higher pulse repetition rates and often longer durations than advertisement calls. H. ebraccata males respond to aggressive calls of H. microcephala and H. phlebodes as they do to their own calls. Heterospecific aggressive interactions probably occur because the species interfere acoustically. Our results demonstrate that H. ebraccata males behave in ways which enhance their ability to communicate in a noisy assemblage of conspecific and heterospecific males.
Keywords
Potential Mate Pulse Repetition Rate High Pulse Aggressive Interaction Playback ExperimentPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Aiken RB (1982) Effects of group density on call rate, phonokinesis, and mating success in Palmacorixa nana (Heteroptera: Corixidae). Can J Zool 60:1665–1672Google Scholar
- Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimental D (ed) Insects, science, and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77Google Scholar
- Allan DM (1973) Some relationships of vocalizations to behavior in the Pacific treefrog, Hyla regilla. Herpetologica 29:366–371Google Scholar
- Awbrey FT (1978) Social interaction among chorusing Pacific treefrogs, Hyla regilla. Copeia 1978:208–214Google Scholar
- Blair WF (1974) Character displacement in frogs. Am Zool 14:1119–1125Google Scholar
- Brzoska J (1982) Vocal response of male European water frogs (Rana esculenta complex) to mating and territorial calls. Behav Proc 7:37–47Google Scholar
- Brown RN (1977) Character convergence in bird song. Can J Zool 55:1523–1529Google Scholar
- Cardoso AJ (1981) Organização espacial e temporal na reprodução e vida larva' ria em uma comunidade de hili' deos no sudeste do Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Unpublished Masters Thesis, Univ Est CampinasGoogle Scholar
- Cody ML (1974) Competition and the structure of bird communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Draper N, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, second edition. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Drewry G (1970) The role of amphibians in the ecology of Puerto Rican rain forest. In: Puerto Rico Nuclear Center Rain Forest Annual Report. Puerto Rico Nuclear Center, San Juan, pp 16–85Google Scholar
- Duellman WE (1970) The hylid frogs of Middle America. Univ Kansas Press, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
- Ebersole JP (1977) The adaptive significance of interspecific territoriality in the reef fish Eupomacentrus leucostictus. Ecology 58:914–920Google Scholar
- Ficken RW, Ficken MS, Hailman JP (1974) Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183:762–763Google Scholar
- Fouquette MJ Jr (1960) Isolating mechanisms in three sympatric treefrogs in the canal zone. Evolution 14:484–497Google Scholar
- Gambs RD, Littlejohn MJ (1979) Acoustic behavior of males of the Rio Grande leopard frog (Rana berlandieri): an experimental analysis through field playback trials. Copeia 1979:643–650Google Scholar
- Gerhardt HC (1974) The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cierea). J Exp Biol 61:229–241Google Scholar
- Gerhardt HC (1978) Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): the significance of some fine-temporal properties. J Exp Biol 74:59–73Google Scholar
- Gerhardt HC (1981a) Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): Importance of two frequency bands as a function of sound pressure level. J Comp Physiol 144:9–16Google Scholar
- Gerhardt HC (1981b) Mating call recognition in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa): Responses to synthetic calls and comparisons with the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J Comp Physiol 144:17–25Google Scholar
- Gerhardt HC (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): implications for mate choice. Am Zool 22:581–595Google Scholar
- Gochfeld M (1979) Interspecific territoriality in red-breasted meadowlarks and a method for estimating the mutuality of their participation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:159–170Google Scholar
- Hultsch H, Todt D (1982) Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:253–260Google Scholar
- Jones MDR (1966) The acoustic behavior of the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. I. Alternation, synchronism and rivalry between males. J Exp Biol 45:15–30Google Scholar
- Latimer W (1981) Acoustic competition in bush crickets. Ecol Entomol 6:35–45Google Scholar
- Lemon RE, Struger J (1980) Acoustic entrainment to randomly generated calls by the frog, Hyla crucifer. J Acoust Soc Am 2090–2095Google Scholar
- Littlejohn MJ (1977) Long-range acoustic communication in anurans: an integrated and evolutionary approach. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 263–294Google Scholar
- Littlejohn MJ, Martin AA (1969) Acoustic interactions between two species of leptodactylid frogs. Anim Behav 17:785–791Google Scholar
- Loftus-Hills JJ (1974) Analysis of an acoustic pacemaker in Strecker's chorus frog, Pseudacris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae). J Comp Physiol 90:75–87Google Scholar
- MacNally RC (1982) Ecological, behavioural, and energy dynamics of two sympatric species of Ranidella (Anura). Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Moynihan M (1968) Social mimicry; character convergence versus character displacement. Evolution 22:315–331Google Scholar
- Murray BG (1976) A critique of interspecific territoriality and character convergence. Condor 78:518–525Google Scholar
- Murray BG (1981) The origins of adaptive interspecific territorialism. Biol Rev 56:1–22Google Scholar
- Myrberg AA Jr., Thresher AE (1974) Interspecific aggression and its relevance to the concept of territoriality in reef fishes. Am Zool 14:81–96Google Scholar
- Narins PM (1982) Behavioral refractory period in neotropical treefrogs. J Comp Physiol 148:337–344Google Scholar
- Narins PM, Capranica RR (1978) Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrog Eleutherodactylus coqui. J Comp Physiol 127:1–9Google Scholar
- Orians GH, Willson MF (1964) Interspecific territories of birds. Ecology 45:736–745Google Scholar
- Ortiz PR, Jenssen TA (1982) Interspecific aggression between lizard competitors, Anolis cooki and Anolis cristatellus. Z Tierpsychol 60:227–238Google Scholar
- Paillette M (1970) La notion de territoire chez les amphibiens anoures, et plus particulierement la valeur des emissions sonores dans le compartement territorial des hylides: Hyla arborea et Hyla meridionalis. In: Richard G (ed) Territoire et domaine vital. Masson, Paris, pp 35–48Google Scholar
- Passmore NI (1978) The vocalizations and aspects of the reproductive behaviour of the genus Ptychadena in South Africa. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Witwatersrand, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
- Pengilley RK (1971) Calling and associated behavior of some species of Pseudophryne (Anura: Leptodactylidae). J Zool (Lond) 163:73–92Google Scholar
- Rosen M, Lemon RE (1974) The vocal behavior os spring peepers, Hyla crucifer. Copeia 1974:940–950Google Scholar
- Samways MJ, Broughton WB (1976) Song modification in the Orthoptera. II. Types of acoustic interaction between Platycleis intermedia and other species of the genus (Tettigoniidae). Physiol Entomol 1:287–297Google Scholar
- Savage JM, Heyer WR (1969) The tree-frogs (Family Hylidae) of Costa Rica: diagnosis and distribution. Rev Biol Trop 16:1–127Google Scholar
- Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983a) An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs. Anim Behav 31:181–190Google Scholar
- Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983b) The influence of background noise on the behavior of a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata. Herpetologica 39:121–129Google Scholar
- Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Smith RL (1973) Aspects of the biology of three species of the genus Rhantus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) with special reference to the acoustical behaviour of two. Can J Entomol 105:909–920Google Scholar
- Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ (1982) The role of synchronized calling, ambient light, and ambient noise, in anit-bat-predator behavior of a treefrog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:125–131Google Scholar
- Walkowiak W, Brzoska J (1982) Signififance of spectral and temporal call parameters in the auditory communication of male grass frogs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:247–252Google Scholar
- Walters J (1979) Interspecific aggressive behaviour by long-toed lapwings (Vanellus crassirostris). Anim Behav 27:969–981Google Scholar
- Wasserman FE (1977) Intraspecific acoustical interference in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicolis). Anim Behav 25:949–952Google Scholar
- Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693Google Scholar
- Wells KD (1980) Behavioral ecology and social organization of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus inguinalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:199–209Google Scholar
- Wells KD, Greer BJ (1981) Vocal responses to conspecific calls in a neotropical hylid frog, Hyla ebraccata. Copeia 1981:615–624Google Scholar
- Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (1984a) Vocal communication in a neotropical frog, Hyla ebraccata: Advertisement calls. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
- Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (1984b) Vocal communication in a neotropical frog, Hyla ebraccata: Aggressive calls. Behaviour (in press)Google Scholar
- Whitney CL, Krebs JR (1975) Spacing and calling in Pacific treefrogs, Hyla regilla. Can J Zool 53:1519–1527Google Scholar
- Wiewandt TA (1969) Vocalizations, aggressive behavior, and territoriality in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1969:276–285Google Scholar
- Zelick RD, Narins PM (1982) Analysis of acoustically evoked call suppression behavior in a neotropical treefrog. Anim Behav 30:728–733Google Scholar