Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 273–278 | Cite as

The costs and benefits of frog chorusing behavior

  • Michael J. Ryan
  • Merlin D. Tuttle
  • Lucinda K. Taft


  1. 1.

    A number of predators, including a bat (Trachops cirrhosus), a frog (Leptodactylus pentadactylus), an opossum (Philander opossum), and a crab (Potamocarcinus richmondi), prey on the neotropical frog Physalaemus pustulosus, which calls in choruses on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.

  2. 2.

    Predation rate (no. of frogs eaten/h of observation) and predation risk to individuals (predation rate/chorus size) were determined for choruses of various sizes. There was no correlation between chorus size and predation rate, but there was a significant negative correlation between chorus size and predation risk.

  3. 3.

    There was a significant correlation between the number of females present and chorus size (i.e., number of males). A second order regression indicates that the proportion of females to males, the operational sex ratio, tends to increase with chorus size; thus, males have a higher probability of mating in larger choruses.

  4. 4.

    We suggest that the benefits of lower predation risk and higher mating probabilities associated with larger choruses were responsible for the evolution of communal sexual display in Physalaemus pustulosus.

  5. 5.

    A cost-benefit model predicts that the size of males that join choruses is influenced by the asymmetric benefits related to male size and the behavior of other males in the population.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimentel D (ed) Insects, science and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77Google Scholar
  2. Bell PD (1979) Acoustic attraction of herons by crickets. Entomol Soc 87:126–127Google Scholar
  3. Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior: recent research and new ideas. Chiron Press, New York (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Bucher TL, Ryan MJ, Bartholomew, GA (1981) Oxygen consumption during resting, calling, and nest building in the frog. Physalaemus pustulosus. Physiol Zool (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Cade W (1975) Acoustically orienting parasitoids: fly phonotaxis to cricket songs. Science 190:1312–1313Google Scholar
  6. Cade W (1979) The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In: Blum M, Blum N (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 343–380Google Scholar
  7. Duellman WE (1958) A monographic study of the colubrid snake genus Leptodiera. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 114:1–57Google Scholar
  8. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the bullfrog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:282–317Google Scholar
  9. Emlen ST, Oring IW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311Google Scholar
  11. Howard RD (1978) The influence of male defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecology 59:789–798Google Scholar
  12. Jaeger RG (1976) A possible prey-call window in anuran auditory processing. Copeia 1976:833–834Google Scholar
  13. Kluge AG (1981) The life history, social organization, and parental behavior of Hyla rosenbergi Boulenger, a nest building gladiator frog. Occas Pap Mus Zool Univ Mich (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Ryan MJ (1980a) Female mate choice in a neotropical frog. Science 209:523–525Google Scholar
  15. Ryan MJ (1980b) The reproductive behavior of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1980:108–114Google Scholar
  16. Ryan MJ (1981) Variation in iguanine social organizations: mating systems in chuckwallas. In: Burghardt GM, Rand AS (eds) Iguanas of the world: ecology, behavior, conservation. Garland Press, New York (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Soper RE, Shewell GE, Tyrell D (1976) Cocandamyia auditrix nov. sp. (Diptera: Scatophagidae), a parasite which is attracted to the call of its host. Can Entomol 108:61–68Google Scholar
  18. Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ (1981) The evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics. Science (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Tuttle MD, Taft LK, Ryan MJ (1980) Location of calling frogs by Philander opossum. Biotropica (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Walker TJ (1964) Experimental demonstration of a cat locating orthopteran prey by the prey's call. Fla Entomol 47:163–165Google Scholar
  21. Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Ryan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Merlin D. Tuttle
    • 3
  • Lucinda K. Taft
    • 4
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Langmuir LaboratoryCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstituteBalboaPanama
  3. 3.Vertebrate DivisionMilwaukee Public MuseumMilwaukeeUSA
  4. 4.Department of Zoological ResearchNational Zoological Park, Smithsonian InstitutionWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations