Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 281–286 | Cite as

Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows

  • William A. Searcy
Article

Summary

Captive female song sparrows (Melospiza melodia), after treatment with estradiol, perform copulation solicitation displays when presented with songs of conspecific males. Females respond more strongly to eight song types than to four, and to sixteen song types than to eight. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that female song sparrows prefer large repertoires, rather than preferring normal or natural repertoire sizes (5 to 13 song types).

The results with captive females might be taken to imply that females in the field prefer as mates those males with the largest repertoire sizes. This hypothesis was tested by observing pairing in a field population. In each of 2 years, there was no significant correlation between male repertoire size and date of initial pair formation. Furthermore, there was no correlation between repertoire size and the speed with which a second mate was acquired after removal of the first. It is concluded that repertoire size does not have an important influence on female choice of mates in song sparrows.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Catchpole CK (1980) Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74:149–166Google Scholar
  2. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Falconer DS (1960) Introduction to quantitative genetics, Ronald Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Howard RD (1974) The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mockingbird song (Mimus polyglottos). Evolution 28:428–438Google Scholar
  5. Knapton RW, Krebs JR (1974) Settlement patterns, territory size, and breeding density in the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). Can J Zool 52:1414–1420Google Scholar
  6. Krebs JR, Ashcroft R, Webber MI (1978) Song repertoires and territory defence. Nature 271:539–542Google Scholar
  7. Kroodsma DE (1976) Reproductive development in a female songbird: differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science 192:574–575Google Scholar
  8. Nice MM (1943) Studies in the life history of the song sparrow. II. The behavior of the song sparrow and other passerines. Trans Linn Soc NY 6:1–328Google Scholar
  9. Searcy WA (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85Google Scholar
  10. Searcy WA, Marler P (1981) A test for responsiveness to song structure and programming in female sparrows. Science 213:926–928Google Scholar
  11. Searcy WA, Marler P (in press) Interspecific differences in the response of female birds to song repertoires. Z TierpsycholGoogle Scholar
  12. Searcy WA, Marler P, Peters SS (1981) Species song discrimination in adult female song and swamp sparrows. Anim Behav 29:997–1003Google Scholar
  13. Walkinshaw LH (1968) Eastern field sparrow. US Natl Mus Bull 237:1217–1235Google Scholar
  14. Yasukawa K (1981) Song repertoires in the red-winged blackbird: a test of the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim Behav 29:114–125Google Scholar
  15. Yasukawa K, Blank JL, Patterson CB (1980) Song repertoires and sexual selection in the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:233–238Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • William A. Searcy
    • 1
  1. 1.The Rockefeller University Field Research CenterMillbrookUSA

Personalised recommendations