Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 47–52 | Cite as

Odd fish abandon mixed-species groups when threatened

  • Nancy G. Wolf
Article

Summary

In a field experiment, two juvenile size classes of striped parrotfish (Scarus iserti), stoplight light parrotfish (Sparisoma viride), and ocean surgeonfish (Acanthurus bahianus) were threatened by a model of a common predator (the trumpetfish, Aulostomus maculatus) while alone and in mixedspecies groups of 3–100 members. Striped parrotfish, which usually consitute the majority of a group, used the groups for protection. Stopight parrotfish, present in very low numbers, hid in the coral. Individuals of both species left a group sooner if it had fewer conspecifics. Small surgeonfish sought protection in groups, while larger individuals too big to be consumed by the trumpetfish, swam away alone. These results may be explained by differences in the protection derived from mixed-species groups, and particularly, by the high predation risk suffered by odd individuals.

Keywords

Field Experiment Size Classis Predation Risk Large Individual High Predation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alevizon WS (1976) Mixed schooling and its possible significance in a tropical western Atlantic parrotfish and surgeonfish. Copeia 1976:796–798Google Scholar
  2. Barlow GW (1975) On the sociobiology of four Puerto Rican parrotfishes (Scaridae). Mar Biol 33:281–293Google Scholar
  3. Barnard CJ (1979) Predation and the evolution of social mimicry in birds. Am Nat 113:613–618Google Scholar
  4. Barnard CJ (1980) Flock feeding and time budgets in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus L.). Anim Behav 28:295–309Google Scholar
  5. Berger J (1978) Group size, foraging, and antipredator ploys: an analysis of bighorn sheep decisions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:91–99Google Scholar
  6. Bertram BCR (1978) Living in groups. In: Krebs JR, Davis NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 1st edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 64–96Google Scholar
  7. Breder CM, Halpern F (1946) Inhate and acquired behavior affecting aggregations of fishes. Physiol Zool 19:154–190Google Scholar
  8. Buskirk WH (1976) Social systems in a tropical forest avifauna. Am Nat 110:293–310Google Scholar
  9. Caraco T (1979) Time budgeting and group size: a test of theory. Ecology 60:618–627Google Scholar
  10. Caraco T, Martindale S, Pulliam HR (1980) Avian flocking in the presence of a predator. Nature 285:400–401Google Scholar
  11. Ehrlich P, Ehrlich A (1973) Coevolution: heterotypic schooling in Caribbean reef fishes. Am Nat 107:157–160Google Scholar
  12. Eshel I (1978) On a prey-predator nonzero-sum game and the evolution of gregarious behavior of evasive prey. Am Nat 112:787–795Google Scholar
  13. Girsa II (1973) Alteration in the behavior and vertical distribution of certain juvenile cyprinids in relation to illumination intensty and the presence of a predator. J Ichthyol 13:449–454Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311Google Scholar
  15. Helfman GS (1978) Patterns of community structure in fishes: summary and overview. Environ Biol Fish 3:129–148Google Scholar
  16. Helfman GS (1983) Resin-coated fishes: a simple model technique for in situ studies of fish behavior. Copeia 1983:547–549Google Scholar
  17. Helfman GS (1984) School fidelity in fishes: the yellow perch pattern. Anim Behav 32:663–672Google Scholar
  18. Hobson ES (1963) Selective feeding by the gafftopsail pompano, Trachinotus rhodopus (Gill), in mixed schools of herring and anchovies in the Gulf of California. Copeia 1963:595–596Google Scholar
  19. Hobson ES (1969) Possible advantages to the blenny Renula azalea in aggregating with the wrasse Thalassoma lucasanum in the tropical eastern Pacific. Copcia 1969:191–193Google Scholar
  20. Hobson ES (1978) Aggregating as a defense against predators in aquatic and terrestrial environments. In: Reese ES, Lighter FJ (eds) Contrasts in behavior. Wiley, New York, pp 219–234Google Scholar
  21. Itzkowitz M (1974) Behavioural reconnaissance of some Jamaican reef fishes. Zool J Linn Soc 55:87–118Google Scholar
  22. Itzkowitz M (1977) Social dynamics of mixed-species groups of Jamaican reef fishes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:361–384Google Scholar
  23. Keenleysde MHA (1979) Diversity and adaptation in fish behaviour. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenward RE (1978) Hawks and doves: attack success and selection in goshawk flights at wood pigeons. J Anim Ecol 47:449–460Google Scholar
  25. Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 1st edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 23–63Google Scholar
  26. Iazarus J (1979) The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive quelea. Anim Behav 27:855–865Google Scholar
  27. Lipetz VE, Bekoff M (1982) Group size and vigilance in pronghorns. Z Tierpsychol 58:203–216Google Scholar
  28. McFarland WN, Hillis ZM (1982) Observations on agonistic behavior between members of juvenile French and white grunts — Family Haemulidae. Bull Mar Sci 32:255–268Google Scholar
  29. Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1983) Foraging, timidity, and shoal size in minnows and goldfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:147–152Google Scholar
  30. Major PF (1977) Predator-prey interactions in schooling fishes during periods of twilight: a study of the silverside Pranesus insularum in Hawaii. Fish Bull 75:415–426Google Scholar
  31. Major PF (1978) Predator-prey interactions in two schooling fishes, Caranx ignobilis and Stolephorus purpureus. Anim Behav 26:760–777Google Scholar
  32. Milinski M (1977) Experiments on the selection by predators against spatial oddity of their prey. Z Tierpsychol 43:311–325Google Scholar
  33. Morse DH (1977) Feeding behavior and predator avoidance in heterospecific groups. BioScience 27:332–339Google Scholar
  34. Morse DH (1980) Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  35. Mueller HC (1971) Oddity and specific searching image more important than conspicuousness in prey selection. Nature 233:345–346Google Scholar
  36. Mueller HC (1975) Hawks select odd prey. Science 188:953–954Google Scholar
  37. Mueller HC (1977) Prey selection in the American kestrel: experiments with two species of prey. Am Nat 11:25–29Google Scholar
  38. Neill SR, Cullen JM (1974) Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of dephalopods and fish predators. J Zool (Lond) 172:549–569Google Scholar
  39. Ogden JC, Buckman NS (1973) Movements, foraging groups, and diurnal migrations of the striped parrotfish Scarus croicensis Bloch (Scaridae). Ecology 54:589–596Google Scholar
  40. Onguchi O (1978) Experiments on the selection against colour oddity of water fleas by three-spined sticklebacks. Z Tierpsychol 47:254–267Google Scholar
  41. Pitcher TJ, Magurran AE, Winfield IJ (1982) Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:149–151Google Scholar
  42. Potts GW (1970) The schooling ethology of Lutianus monostigma (Pisces) in the shallow reef environment of Aldabra. J Zool (Lond) 161:223–235Google Scholar
  43. Potts GW (1981) Behavioural interactions between the Carangidae (Pisces) and their prey on the fore-reef slope of Aldabra, with notes on other predators. J Zool (Lond) 195:385–404Google Scholar
  44. Powell GVN (1974) Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim Behav 2:501–505Google Scholar
  45. Radakov DV (1973) Schooling in the ecology of fish. Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Ltd., translated by Mill H. Halsted Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Robertson DR, Sweatman HP, Fletcher EA, Cleland MG (1976) Schooling as a mechanism for circumventing the territoriality of competitors. Ecology 57:1028–1220Google Scholar
  47. Rüppell G, Gosswein E (1972) Die Schwärme von Leucaspius delineatus (Cyprinidae, Teleostei) bei Gefahr in Hellen und im Dunkeln. Z Vergl Physiol 76:333–340Google Scholar
  48. Schaik CP van (1983) Why are diurnal primates living in groups? Behaviour 87:120–144Google Scholar
  49. Shaw E (1978) Schooling fishes. Am Sci 66:166–175Google Scholar
  50. Siegfried WR, Underhill LG (1975) Flocking as an anti-predator strategy in doves. Anim Behav 23:504–508Google Scholar
  51. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  52. Thompson DBA, Barnard CJ (1983) Anti-predator responses in mixed-species associations of lapwings, golden plovers and black-headed gulls. Anim Behav 31:585–593Google Scholar
  53. Willams GC (1964) Measurement of consociation among fishes and comments on the evolution of schooling. Publ Mus Mich State Univ 2:349–384Google Scholar
  54. Wolf NG (1983) Behavioral ecology of herbivorous fishes in mixed-species groups. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy G. Wolf
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Ecology and SystematicsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations