Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 383–404 | Cite as

Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats

II. A model for the determination of group size
  • J. W. Bradbury
  • S. L. Vehrencamp
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Graphical methods are presented for the simultaneous comparisons of group size and territory size (subsumed jointly under the term “social dispersion”), in organisms with exclusive but contiguous territories. The methods are applied to recently published data on five species of neotropical emballonurid bats with particular emphasis on identifying the factors which set maximal limits on group size. The available evidence suggests that population densities, group territory sizes, and group sizes are all limited by components of the food distribution. More particularly, it is argued that minimization of annual foraging ranges is of advantage to these bats and leads to a colony territory size containing one and only one active food site at any given time. Territory size is thus determined by the average distance between successively available food sites, the number of such sites needed per year, and the average size of these sites. Maximal group size is then determined as a result of this territory size minimization and equals average richness of currently used food patches.

     
  2. 2.

    The model predicts that where food patches are low in richness and close together, social dispersion will be fine-grained; where patches are high in richness and occur far apart, social dispersion will be coarse-grained. Since sites in this study which have many small patches tend to be located in the more stable habitats, the model also predicts that temporal stability in group size and unimodal frequency distributions of group size over space will be associated with fine-grained dispersions. The reverse is predicted for coarse-grained social dispersions.

     
  3. 3.

    The model only predicts the maximal size colonies can take. Among the many possible factors promoting social aggregation up to the predicted maxima, only a few account for the observed congruence in colony sizes and compositions at the roost and on the foraging grounds. These include information transfer about new food sites, location of roosts centrally to reduce energy costs of transit (Horn, 1968), and stabilization of competition with conspecifics at food sites.

     

Keywords

Group Size Colony Size Food Patch Territory Size Active Food 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich-Blake, F.P.G.: Problems of social structure in forest monkeys. In: Social behavior in birds and mammals. (ed. Crook, J.), pp. 79–101. London: Academic Press 1970Google Scholar
  2. Bell, R.H.V.: The use of the herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. In: Animal populations in relation to their food resources. (ed. Watson, A.), pp. 111–124. Oxford: Blackwell 1970Google Scholar
  3. Bradbury, J., Emmons, L.: Social organization of some Trinidad bats. I. Emballonuridae. Z. Tierpsychol. 36, 137–183 (1974)Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury, J., Vehrencamp, S.: Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats. I. Field studies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1, 337–381 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. Brock, V.E., Riffenburgh, R.H.: Fish schooling: a possible factor in reducing predation. J. Cons. Perm. Intern. Exp. Mer. 25, 307–317 (1960)Google Scholar
  6. Brosset, A.: La vie sociale des oiseaux dans une forêt équatoriale du Gabon. Biol. Gabon. 5, 26–69 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J.L.: Alternate routes to sociality in jays—with a theory for the evolution of altruism and communal breeding. Amer. Zoologist 14, 63–80 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Cody, M.L.: Finch flocks in the Mohave Desert. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2, 142–158 (1971)Google Scholar
  9. Crook, J.H.: The evolution of social organization and visual communication in the weaver birds (Ploceinae). Behaviour, Suppl. 10, 1–178 (1964)Google Scholar
  10. Crook, J.H.: The adaptive significance of avian social organizations. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 14, 181–218 (1965)Google Scholar
  11. Dunbar, R.J.M., Dunbar, E.P.: Ecology and population dynamics of Colobus guereza in Ethiopia. Folia Primat. 21, 188–208 (1974)Google Scholar
  12. Frankie, G.W., Baker, H.G., Opler, P.A.: Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 62, 881–919 (1974)Google Scholar
  13. Fretwell, S.D.: Populations in a seasonal environment. Monograph #5. In: Monographs in population biology. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press 1972Google Scholar
  14. Gaston, A.J.: The ecology and behavior of the long-tailed tit. Ibis 115, 330–351 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. Glanders, K.E.: Habitat and resource utilization: an ecological view of social organization in mantled howling monkeys. PhD thesis, Univ. Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 1975Google Scholar
  16. Goodwin, G.G., Greenhall, A.M.: A review of the bats of Trinidad and Tobago. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. His. 122, 187–302 (1961)Google Scholar
  17. Goss-Custard, J.D.: Feeding dispersion in some over-wintering wading birds. In: Social behavior in birds and mammals (ed. Crook, J.), pp. 3–35. New York: Academic Press 1970Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton, W.D.: Geometry for the selfish herd. J. theor. Biol. 31, 295–311 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton, W.J., Watt, K.E.F.: Refuging. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 1, 263–286 (1970)Google Scholar
  20. Horn, H.S.: The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). Ecology 49, 682–694 (1968)Google Scholar
  21. Humphrey, S.R.: Nursey roosts and community diversity of Nearctic bats. J. Mammal 56, 321–346 (1975)Google Scholar
  22. Krebs, J.R.: Territory and breeding density in the great tit, Parus major. Ecology 52, 2–22 (1971)Google Scholar
  23. Krebs, J.R., MacRoberts, M.H., Cullen, J.M.: Flocking and feeding in the great tit Parus major—An experimental study. Ibis 114, 507–530 (1972)Google Scholar
  24. Kruuk, H.: The spotted hyena: A study of predation and social behavior. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press 1972Google Scholar
  25. Lockard, G.B., Owings, D.H.: Moon-related surface activity of bannertail (Dipodomys spectabilis) and fresno (D. nitratoides) Kangaroo rats. Animal Behav. 22, 262–273 (1974)Google Scholar
  26. Lopez-Forment, W.: Some ecological aspects of the bat Balantiopteryx plicata plicata Peters, 1867 (Chiroptera: Emballonuridae) in Mexico M.S. thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York 1976Google Scholar
  27. McNab, B.K.: Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Amer. Naturalist 97, 133–140 (1963)Google Scholar
  28. Morrison, D.W.: The foraging behavior and feeding ecology of a neotropical fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis. PhD thesis, Cornell Univ. Ithaca, New York 1975Google Scholar
  29. Morse, D.H.: Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecol. Mono. 40, 119–168 (1970)Google Scholar
  30. O'Farrell, M.J.: Seasonal activity patterns of rodents in a sagebrush community. J. Mammal. 55, 809–823 (1974)Google Scholar
  31. Papageorgis, C.: Mimicry in neotropical butterflies. Amer. Scientist 63, 522–531 (1975)Google Scholar
  32. Pielou, E.C.: An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley-Interscience 1969Google Scholar
  33. Pulliam, H.R.: On the advantages of flocking. J. theor. Biol. 38, 419–422 (1973)Google Scholar
  34. Ramirez, P.J., Sanchez, H.: Regurgitaciones de lechuza, procedentes de la cueva del canon del Zopilote, Guerrero, Mexico. Rev. Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat. 33, 107–112 (1972)Google Scholar
  35. Robertson, R.J.: Optimal niche space of the red-winged blackbird: spatial and temporal patterns of nesting activity and success. Ecology 54, 1085–1093 (1973)Google Scholar
  36. Schaller, G.B.: The Serengeti lion: A study of predator-prey relations. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press 1972Google Scholar
  37. Treisman, M.: Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion. Animal Behav. 23, 779–800 (1975a)Google Scholar
  38. Treisman, M.: Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. II. An economic model for predatorprey interaction. Animal Behav. 23, 801–825 (1975b)Google Scholar
  39. Turner, D.C.: The vampire bat — A field study in behavior and ecology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 1975Google Scholar
  40. Vehrencamp, S.: The evolution of communal nesting in groove-billed anis. PhD thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York 1976Google Scholar
  41. Vehrencamp, S., Stiles, G.F., Bradbury, J.: Avian prey of the carnivorous bat, Vampyrum spectrum, in Costa Rica. J. Mammal., in pressGoogle Scholar
  42. Vine, I.: Risk of visual detection and pursuit by a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behavior. J. theor. Biol. 30, 405–422 (1971)Google Scholar
  43. Ward, P., Zahavi, A.: The importance of certain assemblages of birds as “information centers” for food-finding. Ibis 115, 517–534 (1973)Google Scholar
  44. Way, M.J., Cammell, M.: Aggregation behavior in relation to food utilization in aphids. In: Animal populations in relation to their food resources (ed. Watson, A.), pp. 229–247. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1970Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, E.O.: Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press 1975Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Bradbury
    • 1
  • S. L. Vehrencamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of California at San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations