Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 324–329 | Cite as

Metacarpal bone mass in normal and osteoporotic Japanese women using computed X-ray densitometry

  • C. Matsumoto
  • K. Kushida
  • K. Yamazaki
  • K. Imose
  • T. Inoue
Clinical Investigations


The metacarpal bone mineral density (BMD) and metacarpal index (MCI) of the second metacarpal bone were measured by computed X-ray densitometry (CXD) (Teijin Ltd., Tokyo), which we have established with the development of microdensitometry of radiographs. In this study, we evaluated the basic attributes of this CXD method and determined the age-related changes in both metacarpal measurements in normal Japanese women. The precision in vivo was measured in eight subjects. The precision errors [coefficient of variation (CV)] were 0.2–1.2% CV for metacarpal BMD and 0.4–2.0% CV for MCI, respectively. We have obtained low precision error and more rapid analysis, within 3 minutes respectively, compared with the previous methods. Age-related changes in the metacarpal measurements were evaluated in 1438 normal women. Both measurements showed the most significant decrease in the sixth decade of life. The rate of decrease in the sixth decade was 1.6%/year for metacarpal BMD and 1.5%/year for MCI. On comparison between metacarpal BMD by CXD and spine BMD using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 248 normal women with and without menstruation, the two measurements were found to be similarly decreased in the subjects within 5 years after menopause. There was also no significant difference in the Z-score between metacarpal BMD and spine BMD within 5 years after menopause. These results indicate that early postmenopausal bone loss occurs not only in the spine but also in the metacarpal bone. The metacarpal BMD for patients with osteoporosis was significantly lower than that for age-matched normal controls, although the Z-score for spine BMD (-1.46) was significantly better than that for metacarpal BMD (-0.82). In conclusion, because CXD has excellent low precision error and is widely available at relatively low cost, it appears potentially to be applicable to problems in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis, when used in association with DXA.

Key words

Photodensitometry Radiogrammetry Metacarpal bone Bone mineral density Osteoporosis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barnett E, Nordin BEC (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166–174Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dequeker J (1976) Quantitative radiology: radiogrammetry of cortical bone. Br J Radiol 49:912–920Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Evans RA, McDonnell GD, Schieb M (1978) Metacarpal cortical area as an index of bone mass. Br J Radiol 51:428–431Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garn SM, Rohmann CG, Wagner B, Davila GH, Ascoli W (1969) Population similarities in the onset and rate of adult endosteal bone loss. Clin Orthop 65:51–60Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morgan DB, Spiers FW, Pulvertraft CN, Fourman P (1967) The amount of bone in the metacarpal and the phalanx according to age and sex. Clin Radiol 18:101–108Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trouerbach WT, Hoornstra K, Birkenhager JC, Zwamborn AW (1985) Roentgendensitometric study of the phalanx. Diagn Imag Clin Med 54:64–77Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trouerbach WT, Birkenhaeger JC, Schmitz PIM, van Hemert AM, van Saase JLCM, Collette HJA, Zwamborn AW (1988) A cross-sectional study of age-related loss of mineral content of phalangeal bone in men and women. Skeletal Radiol 17:338–343Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oguti S (1987) X-ray photodensitometric study of the second metacarpal. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 61:1389–1404Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cosman F, Herrington B, Himmelstein S, Lindsay R (1991) Radiographic absorptiometry: a simple method for determination of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int 2:34–38Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colbert C, Garrett C (1969) Photodensitometry of bone roentgenograms with an on-line computer. Clin Orthop 65:39–45Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strid KG, Kalebo P (1988) Bone mass determination from microradiographs by computer-assisted videodensitometry. Acta Radiologica 4:465–472Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalebo P, Strid KG (1988) Bone mass determination from microradiographs by computer-assisted videodensitometry. Acta Radiologica 5:611–617Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inoue T, Kushida K, Yamashita G (1980) Radiological assessment of bone density using microdensitometer. Kotsutaisha Gakkai Zasshi 13:187–195 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inoue T, Kushida K, Miyamoto T, Sumi Y, Orimo H, Yamashita G (1983) Quantitative assessment of bone density. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 57:1923–1936Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taniguchi M, Kushida K, Denda M, Fujiwara T, Inoue T (1989) A study of 2nd metacarpal bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Cent Jpn J Orthop Trauma 33:970–971 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Orimo H, Shiraki M (1993) Clinical evaluation of menatetrenone (vitamin K2) in the treatment of involutional osteoporosis. Proc 4th Intl Symp on Osteoporosis, pp 148–149Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsumoto C, Kushida K, Orimo H, Koshikawa S, Shiraki M, Akimoto T, Inoue T, Togawa H (1991) A new computed x-ray densitometer and its performance. J Clin Exp Med (Igaku no Ayumi) 156:741–742Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kalla AA, Meyers OL, Parkyn ND, Kotze TJvW (1989) Osteoporosis screening—radiogrammetry revisited. Br J Rheumatol 28:511–517Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rico H, Hernandez ER (1989) Bone radiogrametry: caliper versus magnifying glass. Calcif Tissue Int 45:285–287Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matsumoto C, Kushida K, Sumi Y, Yamazaki K, Taniguti M, Inoue T (1990) Development of computed x-ray densitometry and its application. Proc 3rd Intl Symp on Osteoporosis, pp 772–775Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Todorovsky N, Ribot C (1991) Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 6:997–1002Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Larcos G, Wahner HW (1991) An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Nucl Med 32:2101–2106Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mazess RB (1981) On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop 165:239–252Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kin K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Okamoto S, Inoue T (1988) Bone mineral density of the spine in normal Japanese subjects. J Bone Miner Metab 8:53–56Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M, Johnston C, Dawson-Hughes B, Baran D, Powell M, Notelovitz M (1987) Spine and femur density using dual-photon absorptiometry in US white women. Bone Miner 2:211–219Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geusens P, Dequeker J, Verstraeten A, Nijs J (1986) Age-, sex-, and menopause-related changes of vertebral and peripheral bone: population study using dual and single photon absorptiometry and radiogrammetry. J Nucl Med 27:1540–1549Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kin K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Okamoto S, Inoue T (1991) Bone mineral density of the spine in normal Japanese subjects using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: effect of obesity and menopausal status. Calcif Tissue Int 49:101–106Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alhava EM (1991) Bone density measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 49:s21-s23Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wishart JM, Horowitz M, Bochner M, Need AG, Nordin BEC (1993) Relationships between metacarpal morphometry, forearm and vertebral bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. Br J Radiol 66:435–440Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meena HE (1991) Improved vertebral fracture threshold in postmenopausal osteoporosis by radiogrammetric measurements: its usefulness in selection for preventive therapy. J Bone Miner Res 6:9–14Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cooper C, Wickham C, Walsh K (1991) Appendicular skeletal status and hip fracture in the elderly: 14-year prospective data. Bone 12:361–364Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Riis BJ, Christiansen C (1988) Measurement of spinal or peripheral bone mass to estimate early postmenopausal bone loss? Am J Med 84:646–653Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Black DM, Cummings SR, Genant HK, Nevitt MC, Palermo L, Browner W (1992) Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women. J Bone Miner Res 7:633–638Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eastell R, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Amadio PC, Melton LJ III, Riggs BL (1989) Unequal decrease in bone density of lumbar spine and ultradistal radius in Colles' and vertebral fracture syndromes. J Clin Invest 83:168–174Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    The present state of national nutrition (1991) Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Matsumoto
    • 1
  • K. Kushida
    • 1
  • K. Yamazaki
    • 1
  • K. Imose
    • 2
  • T. Inoue
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHamamatsu University School of MedicineHamamatsuJapan
  2. 2.Teijin LimitedTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations