Coral Reefs

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 225–234 | Cite as

Predation on juvenile coral reef fishes: an exclusion experiment

  • Peter J. Doherty
  • Peter F. Sale
Article

Abstract

The densities of recruits on caged and uncaged areas were compared in an experiment done to show the extent of predation on recently metamorphosed coral reef fishes. The design was unlike typical caging experiments, however, in that areas were caged only for short periods of 20–30 days and several independent trials, testing the same null hypothesis, were run. This was done to avoid confounding the effects of excluding herbivorous fishes with the effects of excluding piscivorous fishes. A third treatment, partially-meshed cages, revealed that the experiment was complicated by several other factors. Some prey species were attracted to the high relief offered by the experimental structures. Others responded to the differences in shelter from predators by redispersing themselves among the treatments shortly after settlement. There was also at least one significant “edge” effect caused by fishes preferring to settle near the boundaries of all treatments. In spite of these difficulties, observations on known individuals revealed that rates of mortality were age-dependent and decreased rapidly after metamorphosis. More than 25% of such fishes disappeared during their first five days in the benthic habitat compared with >10% of fishes aged 6–10 days and no losses of fishes aged 11–15 days. These early losses are the greatest instantaneous rates of mortality yet documented for recruited reef fishes. The experiment also suggested different rates of early mortality for various groupings of species: individuals of solitary, sedentary species disappeared approximately half as fast as individuals of the more mobile, and the more gregarious, species. This is probably a true reflection of the different vulnerability of these groups to predation and it may be caused by the different ways in which these fishes use the coral substratum. Our experience suggests that caging artifacts can have major impacts on the results obtained from this type of experiment and they must be controlled for adequately. We conclude that studies of predation on reef fishes may be done more easily using other methods.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson GRV (1984) The role of predation in the maintenance of diversity in coral reef fish communities. Abstract, workshop on current topics in the ecology of coral reef fishes, Australian Institute of Marine Science 26–28 Oct 1984Google Scholar
  2. Choat JH (1982) Fish feeding and the structure of benthic communities in temperate waters. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:423–449Google Scholar
  3. Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Connell JH (1974) Field experiments in marine ecology. In: Mariscal R (ed) Experimental marine biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–54Google Scholar
  5. Dayton PK, Oliver JS (1980) An evaluation of experimental analyses of population and community patterns in benthic marine invertebrates. In: Tenore KR, Coull BC (eds) Marine benthic dynamics. University of South Carolina Press, pp 93–120Google Scholar
  6. Doherty PJ (1980) Biological and physical constraints on the populations of two sympatric territorial damselfishes on the southern Great Barrier Reef. PhD dissertation, The University of Sydney, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  7. Doherty PJ (1982) Some effects of density on the juveniles of two species of tropical, territorial damselfish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 65:249–261Google Scholar
  8. Doherty PJ (1983a) Tropical, territorial damselfishes: is density limited by aggression or recruitment? Ecology 64:176–190Google Scholar
  9. Doherty PJ (1983b) Coral reef fishes: recruitment-limited assemblages? Proc 4th Int Coral Reef Symp, Manila, pp 465–470Google Scholar
  10. Ehrlich PR (1975) The population biology of coral reef fishes. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 6:211–247Google Scholar
  11. Goldman B, Talbot FH (1976) Aspects of the ecology of coral reef fishes. In: Jones AO, Endean R (eds) The biology and geology of coral reefs. III. Biology 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 125–154Google Scholar
  12. Helfman GS (1978) Patterns of community structure in fishes: summary and overview. Environ Biol Fish 3:129–148Google Scholar
  13. Hixon MA (1980) Competitive interactions between California reef fishes of the genus Embiotoca. Ecology 61:918–931Google Scholar
  14. Hurlberg LW, Oliver JS (1980) Caging manipulations in marine soft bottom communities: importance of animal interactions or sedentary habitat modifications. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:1130–1139Google Scholar
  15. Jones GP (1984a) Population ecology of the temperate reef fish Pseudolabrus celidotus Bloch & Schneider (Pisces: Labridae). I. Factors affecting recruitment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 75:257–276Google Scholar
  16. Jones GP (1984b) Population ecology of the temperate reef fish Pseudolabrus celidotus Bloch & Schneider (Pisces: Labridae). II. Factors affecting adult density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 75:277–303Google Scholar
  17. Keough MJ, Downes BJ (1982) Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality. Oecologia 54:348–352Google Scholar
  18. Larson RJ (1980) Competition, habitat selection, and the bathymetric segregation of two rockfish (Sebastes) species. Ecol Monogr 50:221–239Google Scholar
  19. Lassig BR (1982) The minor role of large transient fishes in structuring full scale coral patch reef fish assemblages. PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  20. Munger JC, Brown JH (1981) Competition in desert rodents: an experiment with semipermeable exclosures. Science 211:510–512Google Scholar
  21. Potts GW (1980) The predatory behaviour of Caranx melampygus (Pisces) in the channel environment at Aldabara Atoll (Indian Ocean). J Zool 192:323–350Google Scholar
  22. Russ GR (1980) Effects of predation by fishes, competition, and structural complexity of the substratum on the establishment of a marine epifaunal community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 42:55–69Google Scholar
  23. Sale PF (1980) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 18:367–421Google Scholar
  24. Sale PF, Douglas WA (1984) Temporal variability in the community structure of fish on coral patch reefs and the relation of community structure to reef structure. Ecology 65:409–422Google Scholar
  25. Sale PF, Doherty PJ, Douglas WA (1980) Juvenile recruitment strategies and coexistence of territorial pomacentrids. Bull Mar Sci 30:147–158Google Scholar
  26. Schmidt GH, Warner GF (1984) Effects of caging on the development of a sessile epifaunal community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 15:251–263Google Scholar
  27. Shulman MJ (1984) Resource limitation and recruitment patterns in a coral reef fish assemblage. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 74:85–109Google Scholar
  28. Shulman MJ, Ogden JC, Ebersole JP, McFarland WN, Miller SL, Wolf NG (1983) Priority effects in the recruitment of juvenile coral reef fishes. Ecology 64:1508–1513Google Scholar
  29. Stephenson W, Searles RB (1960) Experimental studies on the ecology of intertidal environments at Heron Island. I. Exclusion of fish from beach rock. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 11:241–267Google Scholar
  30. Sweatman HPA (1984) A field study of the predatory behaviour and feeding rate of a piscivorous coral reef fish, the lizardfish Synodus englemani. Copeia 1984:187–194Google Scholar
  31. Talbot FH, Russell BC, Anderson GVR (1978) Coral reef fish communities: unstable, high-diversity systems? Ecol Mongr 48:425–440Google Scholar
  32. Thompson SM, Jones GP (1983) Interspecific territoriality and competition for food between the reef fishes Forsterygion varium and Pseudolabrus celidotus. Mar Biol 76:95–104Google Scholar
  33. Victor B (1983) Recruitment and population dynamics of a coral reef fish. Science 219:419–420Google Scholar
  34. Williams DMcB (1979) Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of pomacentrids (Pisces: Pomacentridae) on small patch reefs in the One Tree Lagoon. PhD dissertation, The University of Syndney, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams DMcB (1980) Dynamics of the pomacentrid community on small patch reefs in One Tree Lagoon (Great Barrier Reef). Bull Mar Sci 30:159–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Doherty
    • 1
  • Peter F. Sale
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations