Rivalité acoustique et hiérarchie chez l'ephippiger (insecte, orthoptère, Tettigoniidea,)

Alexander, R. D.: Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in Field Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behav. 17, 130–223 (1961).Google Scholar

Allee, W. C.: Dominance and hierarchy in societies in vertebrates; dans: Structure et Physiologie des Sociétés Animales (P. P. Grassé, ed.) Coll. Int. du C.N.R.S. No 34, 157–181 (1952).Google Scholar

Anderson, P. K.: Studies in the ecology of the narrow-mouthed toad Microhyla carolinesis. Tulane Studies in Zool. 2, 15–46 (1954).Google Scholar

Beilharz, R. G., and P.J. Mylrea: Social position and behaviour of dairy heifers in yards. Anim. Behav. 11, 522–527 (1963).Google Scholar

—: Social position and movement orders of dairy heifers. Anim. Behav. 11, 529–533 (1963b).Google Scholar

Bernstein, I.S. and W.A. Mason: Group formation by monkeys. Anim. Behav. 11, 28–31 (1963).Google Scholar

Blair, W. F.: Call structure and species groups in U.S. treefrogs (Hyla). South western Nat., 3, 77–89 (1959).Google Scholar

Bouissou, M.-F.: Observations sur la hierarchie sociale chez les Bovins domestiques. Thèse Fac. Sciences Paris p. 1–36 (sous presse), et Ann. Biol. anim. Bioch. Biophys. 5, 327–339 (1965).Google Scholar

Bovbjerg, R. V.: Dominance order in the crayfish (Orconectes virilis, Hagen). Physiol. Zool. 26, 173–178 (1953).Google Scholar

—: Some factors affecting aggressive behavior in crayfish. Physiol. Zool. 29, 127–136 (1956).Google Scholar

Busnel, M.-C.. et R.-G. Busnel: La directivité acoustique des déplacements de la femelle d'Oecanthus pellucens Scop. C.R.Soc. Biol. (Paris) 148, 830–833 (1954).Google Scholar

Busnel, R.-G., et B. Dumortier: Observations sur le comportement acoustico-sexuel de la femelle d'Ephippiger bitterensis. C. R. Soc. Biol., (Paris) 148, 1589–1592 (1954).Google Scholar

—: Rapport entre la vitesse de déplacement et l'intensité du stimulus dans le comportement acoustico-sexuel de la femelle d'Ephippiger bitterensis (Tettigoniidae). C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 242, 174–177 (1956).Google Scholar

Busnel, R.-G., B. Dumortier, et M.-C. Busnel: Recherches sur le comportement acoustique des Ephippigères (Orthoptères, Tettigoniidae). Bull. biol. France Belg. 15, fasc. 3, 219–286 (1956).Google Scholar

— et F. Pasquinelly: Phonotaxie de la femelle d'Ephippiger (Orthoptère) à des signaux acoustiques synthétiques. C. R. Soc Biol. (Paris) 149, 11–13 (1955).Google Scholar

—, et W. Loher: Etude des caractères physiques réactogènes de signaux acoustiques artificiels déclencheurs de phonotropismes chez les Acrididae (Orthoptères). Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 61, 52–60 (1956).Google Scholar

Carpenter, C. R.: Sexual behaviour of free ranging rhesus monkeys. J. comp. physiol. psychol. 83, 113–142 (1942).Google Scholar

-Territoriality: A review of concepts and problems; dans: Behavior and evolution (Roe and Simpson, eds.), p. 224–250. Yale Univ. Press 1958.Google Scholar

Collias, N. E.: Aggressive behavior among vertebrate animals. Physiol. Zool. 17, 83–123 (1944).Google Scholar

Dumortier, B. et al: Facteurs externes contrôlant le rythme des périodes de chant chez Ephippiger ephippiger C.R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 244, 2315–2318 (1957).Google Scholar

Goin, C. J.: The peeporder in peepers. Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci. 11, 59–61 (1949).Google Scholar

Grant, E. C., and M. R. A. Chance: Rank order in caged rats. Anim. Behav. 6, 183–194 (1958).Google Scholar

Guhl, A. M., and F. W. Atkeson: Social organisation in a herd of dairy cows. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 62, 80–87 (1959).Google Scholar

Hediger, H.: Instinkt und Territorium; dans: L'Instinct dans le comportement des animaux et de l'homme. Fondation Singer-Polignac, p. 521–543. Paris: Masson & Cie. 1956.Google Scholar

Jacobs, M. E.: Studies on territorialism and sexual selection in dragonflies. Ecology 36, 566–586 (1955).Google Scholar

Kato, M., and K. Hayasaka: Notes on the dominance order in experimental populations of crickets. Ecol. Rev., 14, 311–315 (1958).Google Scholar

Katz, I.: Behavioral interaction in a herd of barbary sheep. Zoological, N. Y., 34, 9–18 (1949).Google Scholar

Leroy, Y.: Signaux acoustiques, comportements et systématiques de quelques espèces de Gryllidés (Orthopt., Ensifères). Bull. biol. France Belg. 100, No 1 (1966) (sous presse).Google Scholar

Loher, W.: Thèse. Untersuchungen über den Aufbau und die Entstehung der Gesänge einiger Feldheuschreckenarten und den Einfluß von Lautzeiehen auf das akustische Verhalten. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 39, 313–356 (1957).Google Scholar

Lowe, M. E.: Dominance-subordinance relationships in the crawfish Cambarellus shuffeldtii. Tulane Studies in Zool. 4, 141–170 (1956).Google Scholar

MacHuge, T.: Social behaviour of the american buffalo (Bison bison bison). Zoologica, (N. Y.), 43, 1–40 (1958).Google Scholar

Moore, N. W.: On the so-called “territories” of dragonflies (Odonata-Anisoptera). Behav. Sci. 4, 85–100 (1952).Google Scholar

Murchison, C.: The experimental measurement of a social hierarchy in Gallus domesticus. Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 12, 3–39 (1935).Google Scholar

Ratner, S. C.: Effect of learning to be submissive on status in the peckorder of domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 9, 34–37 (1961).Google Scholar

Schein, M. W., and M. H. Fohrman: Social dominance relationships in a herd of dairy cattle. Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 3, 45–55 (1955).Google Scholar

Schloeth, R.: Quelques moyens d'intercommunication des taureaux de Camargue. Terre et la Vie 2, 83–93 (1956).Google Scholar

Scott, J. P.: Social behaviour organisation and leadership in a small flock of domestic sheep. Comp. psychol. Monog. 18, 1–29 (1945).Google Scholar

Stewart, J., and J. P. Scott: Lack of correlation between leadership and dominance relationship in a herd of goats. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 40, 255–264 (1947).Google Scholar

Toigo, R.: Social status and schoolroom aggression in third grade children. Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 71, 221–268 (1955).Google Scholar

Woodbury, A. M.: Changing the hook order in cows. Ecology 22, 410–411 (1941).Google Scholar

Yerkes, R. M.: Social behaviour of chimpanzees. Dominance between mates in relation to sexual status. J. comp. Psychol. 30, No 1, 147–186 (1940).Google Scholar