Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 217–224 | Cite as

Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera

  • R. H. Crozier
  • M. W. Dix
Article

Summary

We propose two models for the inheritance of the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Under the Individualistic model, individuals are hostile unless they share at least one allele at all colony-odor loci. Under the Gestalt model, colony-odor pheromones are transferred between individuals, resulting in a ‘gestalt’ colony odor; colonies will not fuse unless they have the same genetic mix of workers. We analyze these models for the case of colonies founded by single, once-mated queens. The Gestalt model seems generally favored for most species, although some evidence suggests the Individualistic model may operate in some primitive ants. A single colony-odor locus is possible in the Gestalt model, but seems improbable in the Individualistic case. We propose a general inbreeding test to estimate the number of loci involved in colony odor.

Keywords

Genetic Model Individualistic Case Individualistic Model Innate Component Colony Odor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrows, E.M., Bell, W.J., Michener, C.D.: Individual odor differences and their social functions in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 2824–2828 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. Brown, W.L.: An hypothesis concerning the function of the metapleural glands in ants. Am. Nat. 102, 188–191 (1968)Google Scholar
  3. Burnet, F.M.: Multiple polymorphism in relation to histocompatibility antigens. Nature 245, 359–361 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Chauvin, R.: Animal societies from the bee to the gorilla (trans. G. Ordisk). New York: Hill and Wang 1968Google Scholar
  5. Crozier, R.H.: Heterozygosity and sex-determination in haplodiploidy. Am. Nat. 105, 399–412 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. Crozier, R.H.: Evolutionary genetics of the hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 22, 263–288 (1977)Google Scholar
  7. Hangartner, W., Reichson, J.M., Wilson, E.O.: Orientation to nest material by the ant, Pogonomyrmex badius (Latreille). Anim. Behav. 18, 331–334 (1970)Google Scholar
  8. Haskins, C.P., Haskins, E.F.: Notes on the biology and social behavior of the archaic ponerine ants of the genera Myrmecia and Promymecia. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 43, 461–491 (1950)Google Scholar
  9. Hubbard, M.D.: Influence of nest material and colony odor on digging in the ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 9, 127–132 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. Imai, H.T., Crozier, R.H., Taylor, R.W.: Karyotype evolution in Australian ants. Chromosoma 59, 341–393 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. Ribbands, C.R.: The role of recognition of comrades in the defence of social insect communities. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 14, 159–168 (1965)Google Scholar
  12. Wright, S.: Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol 2, the theory of gene frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1969Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Crozier
    • 1
  • M. W. Dix
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ZoologyUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia
  2. 2.Universidad del Valle de GuatemalaGuatemalaGuatemala

Personalised recommendations