Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 260, Issue 1, pp 49–61 | Cite as

The organization of plurisegmental mechanosensitive interneurons in the central nervous system of the wandering spider Cupiennius salei

  • Wulfila Gronenberg
Article

Summary

In spiders the bulk of the central nervous system (CNS) consists of fused segmental ganglia traversed by longitudinal tracts, which have precise relationships with sensory neuropils and which contain the fibers of large plurisegmental interneurons. The responses of these interneurons to various mechanical stimuli were studied electrophysiologically, and their unilateral or bilateral structure was revealed by intracellular staining. Unilateral interneurons visit all the neuromeres on one side of the CNS. They receive mechanosensory input either from a single leg or from all ipsilateral legs via sensory neurons that invade leg neuromeres and project into specific longitudinal tracts. The anatomical organization of unilateral interneurons suggests that their axons impart their information to all ipsilateral leg neuromeres. Bilateral interneurons are of two kinds, symmetric and asymmetric neurons. The latter respond to stimulation of all legs on one side of the body, having their dendrites amongst sensory tracts of the same side of the CNS. Anatomical evidence suggests that their terminals invade all four contralateral leg neuromeres. Bilaterally symmetrical plurisegmental interneurons have dendritic arborizations in both halves of the fused ventral ganglia. They respond to the stimulation of any of the 8 legs. A third class of cells, the ascending neurons have unilateral or bilateral dendritic arborizations in the fused ventral ganglia and show blebbed axons in postero-ventral regions of the brain. Their response characteristics are similar to those of other plurisegmental interneurons. Descending neurons have opposite structural polarity, arising in the brain and terminating in segmental regions of the fused ventral ganglia. Descending neurons show strong responses to visual stimulation. Approximately 50% of all the recorded neurons respond exclusively to stimulation of a single type of mechanoreceptor (either tactile hairs, or trichobothria, or slit sensilla), while the rest respond to stimulation of a variety of sensilla. However, these functional differences are not obviously reflected by the anatomy. The functional significance of plurisegmental interneurons is discussed with respect to sensory convergence and the coordination of motor output to the legs. A comparison between the response properties of certain plurisegmental interneurons and their parent longitudinal tracts suggests that the tracts themselves do not reflect a modality-specific organization.

Key words

Neuroanatomy Intracellular recording Spider central nervous system Plurisegmental interneurons Cupiennius salei (Chelicerata) 

Abbreviations

BPI

bilateral plurisegmental interneuron

CNS

central nervous system

FVG

fused ventral ganglia

LT

longitudinal tract

PI

plurisegmental interneuron

PSTH

peristimulus timehistogram

UPI

unilateral plurisegmental interneuron

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babu KS, Barth FG (1984) Neuroanatomy of the central nervous system of the wandering spider, Cupiennius salei (Arachnida, Araneida). Zoomorphology 104:344–359Google Scholar
  2. Babu KS, Barth FG (1989) Central nervous projections of mechanoreceptors in the spider Cupiennius salei Keys. Cell Tissue Res 258:69–82Google Scholar
  3. Babu KS, Barth FG, Strausfeld NJ (1985) Intersegmental sensory tracts and contralateral motor neurons in the leg ganglia of the spider Cupiennius salei Keys. Cell Tissue Res 241:53–57Google Scholar
  4. Bacon JP, Altman (1977) A silver intensification method for cobaltfilled neurones in wholemount preparations. Brain Res 138:359–363Google Scholar
  5. Bacon JP, Murphey RK (1984) Receptive fields of the cricket giant interneurones are related to their dendritic structure. J Physiol 352:601–623Google Scholar
  6. Bacon JP, Tyrer M (1978) The tritocerebral commissure giant (TCG): a bimodal interneurone in the locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J Comp Physiol [A] 126:317–325Google Scholar
  7. Barth FG (1985) Neuroethology of the spider vibration sense. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 203–229Google Scholar
  8. Barth FG, Geethabali (1982) Spider vibration receptors: threshold curves of individual slits in the metatarsal lyriform organ. J Comp Physiol [A] 148:175–185Google Scholar
  9. Bräunig P, Hustert R, Pflüger HJ (1981) Distribution and specific central projections of mechanoreceptors in the thorax and proximal leg joints of locust. I. Morphology, location and innervation of internal proprioceptors of pro- and metathorax and their central projections. Cell Tissue Res 216:57–77Google Scholar
  10. Brogan RT, Pitman RM (1981) Axonal regeneration in an identified motor neuron. J Physiol 319:34–35Google Scholar
  11. Eibl E, Huber F (1979) Central projections of tibial sensory fibers within the three thoracic ganglia of crickets (Gryllus campestris L., Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer). Zoomorphologie 92:1–17Google Scholar
  12. Gronenberg W (1987) Neuronal elements in the CNS of a spider (Cupiennius salei): anatomy and physiology. In: Elsner N, Creutzfeld O (eds) New frontiers in brain research. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 78Google Scholar
  13. Gronenberg W (1989) Anatomical and physiological observations on the organization of mechanoreceptors and local interneurons in the central nervous system of the wandering spider Cupiennius salei. Cell Tissue Res 258:163–175Google Scholar
  14. Hanström B (1935) Fortgesetzte Untersuchungen über das Araneengehirn. Zool Jahrb Abt Ontog Tiere Anat 59:455–478Google Scholar
  15. Harris DJ, Mill PJ (1977) Observations on the leg receptors of Ciniflo (Araneida: Dictynidae). J Comp Physiol [A] 119:37–54Google Scholar
  16. Hedwig B (1986) On the role in stridulation of plurisegmental interneurons of the acridid grasshopper Omocestus viridulus L. I. Anatomy and physiology of descending cephalothoracic interneurons. J Comp Physiol [A] 158:413–427Google Scholar
  17. Hergenröder R, Barth FG (1983) The release of attack and escape behavior by vibratory stimuli in a wandering spider (Cupiennius salei Keys.). J Comp Physiol [A] 152:347–358Google Scholar
  18. Hustert R (1985) Multisegmental integration and divergence of afferent information from single tactile hairs in a cricket. J Exp Biol 118:209–227Google Scholar
  19. Hustert R, Pflüger HJ, Bräunig P (1981) Distribution and specific central projections of mechanoreceptors in the thorax and proximal leg joints of locusts. III. The external mechanoreceptors: the campaniform sensilla. Cell Tissue Res 216:97–111Google Scholar
  20. Kien J (1980) Mechanisms of motor control by plurisegmental interneurons in locusts. J Comp Physiol [A] 140:303–320Google Scholar
  21. Larimer JL, Jellies J (1983) The organization of flexion-evoking interneurons in the abdominal nerve cord of the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. J Exp Zool 226:342–351Google Scholar
  22. Laurent G (1986) Thoracic intersegmental interneurones in the locust with mechanoreceptive inputs from a leg. J Comp Physiol [A] 159:171–186Google Scholar
  23. Milde JJ, Seyfarth E-A (1988) Tactile hairs and leg reflexes in wandering spiders: physiological and anatomical correlates of reflex activity in the leg ganglia. J Comp Physiol [A] 162:623–631Google Scholar
  24. Pflüger HJ, Bräunig P, Hustert R (1981) Distribution and specific central projections of mechanoreceptors in the thorax and proximal leg joints of locusts. II. The external mechanoreceptors: hair plates and tactile hairs. Cell tissue Res 216:79–96Google Scholar
  25. Reißland A, Görner P (1978) Mechanics of trichobothria in orbweaving spiders (Agelenidae, Araneae). J Comp Physiol [A] 123:59–69Google Scholar
  26. Reißland A, Görner P (1985) Trichobothria. In: Barth FG (ed), Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 138–161Google Scholar
  27. Speck-Hergenröder J, Barth FG (1987) Tuning of vibration sensitive neurons in the central nervous system of a wandering spider, Cupiennius salei Keys. J Comp Physiol [A] 160:467–475Google Scholar
  28. Strausfeld NJ, Bassemir U, Singh RN, Bacon JP (1984) Organizational principles of output from dipteran brains. J Insect Physiol 30:73–93Google Scholar
  29. Watson AHD, Burrows M (1982) The ultrastructure of identified motor neurones and their synaptic relationships. J Comp Neurol 205:383–347Google Scholar
  30. Watson AHD, Burrows M (1983) The morphology, ultrastructure, and distribution of synapses on an intersegmental interneuron of the locust. J Comp Neurol 214:154–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wulfila Gronenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoologisches InstitutJohann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversitätFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Division of Neurobiology, Arizona Research LaboratoriesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations