Polar Biology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 155–160 | Cite as

Factors affecting weaning weight in Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella at South Georgia

  • D. W. Doidge
  • J. P. Croxall


Relationships between size, body condition, age and feeding-attendance patterns during pup rearing of female Antacrtic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella and their effects on the timing of birth and weaning, pup weight, growth and condition were studied at South Georgia in 1981–1982. Twenty-seven (6 male, 21 female) mother-pup pairs were followed from birth to weaning. The analysis of maternal effects was limited to female pups because of the small sample size of male weaners. High weaning weight was associated with those female pups whose mothers spent more time ashore attending their offspring. Weaning weight showed no relationship with perinatal duration, number of feeding trips to sea, days at sea or date of weaning. A further 63 mother-pup pairs were analysed for the effects of maternal body condition (weight/length), age and timing of birth on offspring body weight and condition. Pup weight and condition were weakly correlated with maternal age in female pups. Male pups born earlier in the season were heavier and in better condition. Maternal and offspring body weight and condition were unrelated. For the Antarctic fur seal population at South Georgia where the food supply was apparently not limiting in summer, maternal condition and foraging time were subordinate to maternal care on land (as expressed by attendance duration) in determining offspring weight at weaning.


Body Condition Maternal Care Maternal Effect Maternal Body Maternal Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adalsteinsson S (1979) The independent effects of live weight and body condition on the fecundity and productivity of Icelandic ewes. Anim Prod 28:13–24Google Scholar
  2. American Society of Mammalogists Committee on Marine Mammals (1967) Standard measurements of seals. J Mammal 48:459–462Google Scholar
  3. Bartholomew GA (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24:546–559Google Scholar
  4. Bryden MM (1968) Lactation and suckling in relation to early growth of the Southern Eleplant Seal, Mirounga leonina. Aust J Zool 16:739–748Google Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red Deer: Behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Croxall JP, McCann TS, Prince PA, Rothery P (in press) Reproductive performance of seabirds and seals at South Georgia and Signy Island, South Orkney Islands 1976–1986: Implications for Southern Ocean monitoring studies. In: Sahrhage D (ed) Antarctic ocean and resources variability. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. De Lange PGB, Van Kempen GJM, Klaver J, Verstegen MWA (1980) Effect of condition of sows on energy balance during 7 days before and 7 days after parturition. J Anim Sci 50:886–891Google Scholar
  8. Doidge DW (1987) Rearing of twin offspring to weaning in Arctocephalus gazella. In: Croxall JP, Gentry RL (eds) The status, biology and ecology of fur seals. US Dept of Commerce, NOAA Tech Rep NMFS 51, pp 107–111Google Scholar
  9. Doidge DW, Croxall JP (1985) Diet and energy budget of the Antarctic fur seal, Arctocephalus gazella, at South Georgia. In: Siegfied WR, Condy PR, Laws RM (eds) Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs. Springer, Berlin, pp 543–550Google Scholar
  10. Doidge DW, Croxall JP, Ricketts C (1984a) Growth rates of Antarctic Fur Seal Arctocephalus gazella pups at South Georgia. J Zool 203:87–93Google Scholar
  11. Doidge DW, Croxall JP, Baker JR (1984b) Density-dependent pup mortality in the Antarctic Fur Seal Arctocephalus gazella at South Georgia. J Zool 202:449–460Google Scholar
  12. Doidge DW, McCann TS, Croxall JP (1986) Attendance behaviour of Antarctic fur seals. In: Gentry RL, Kooyman GL (eds) Fur seals: maternal strategies on land and at sea. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 102–114Google Scholar
  13. Foxton P (1956) The distribution of the standing crop of zooplankton in the Southern Ocean. Discovery Rep 28:191–236Google Scholar
  14. Geisler PA, Fenlon JS (1979) Effects of body weight and its components on lambing performance in some commercial flocks in Britain, UK. Anim Prod 28:245–256Google Scholar
  15. Gentry RL, Holt JR (1986) Attendance behaviour of northern fur seals. In: Gentry RL, Kooyman GL (eds) Fur scals: maternal strategies on land and at sea. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  16. Hewson R, Verkaik AJ (1981) Body condition and ranging behaviour of blackface hill sheep in relation to lamb survival. J Appl Ecol 18:401–416Google Scholar
  17. Hodgson J, Peart JN, Russell AJF, Whitelaw A, Macdonald AJ (1980) The influence of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of spring calving suckler cows and their calves. Anim Prod 30:315–326Google Scholar
  18. Holdroyd RG, O'Rouke PG, Clarke MR, Loxton ID (1983) Influence of pasture type and supplement on fertility and live weight of cows and progeny growth rate in the dry tropics of northern Queensland. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 23:4–13Google Scholar
  19. King KP, Stockdale CR, Patterson IF (1980) The effect of restriction of pasture intake in late lactation on milk production and body condition of dairy cows. Aust J Agric Anim Husb 20:389–393Google Scholar
  20. Kooyman GL, Davis RW, Croxall JP (1986) Diving behaviour of Antarctic Fur Seals. In: Gentry RL, Kooyman GL (eds) Fur seals. Maternal strategies on land and at sea. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, pp 115–125Google Scholar
  21. McCann TS (1981) Aggression and sexual activity of male southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina. J Zool 195:295–310Google Scholar
  22. Payne MR (1977) Growth of a fur seal population, Philos Trans R Soc, Ser B 279:67–79Google Scholar
  23. Payne MR (1978) Population size and age determination in the Antarctic Fur Seal Arctocephalus gazella. Mammal Rev 8:67–73Google Scholar
  24. Payne MR (1979) Growth in the Antarctic Fur Seal Arctocephalus gazella. J Zool 187:1–20Google Scholar
  25. SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS Procedures Guide for Personal Computers, Version, 6 edn. Cary NC, SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
  26. Sokal RR, Rohlf IJ (1969) Biometry Freeman, San Francisco, 776 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 593 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Stern D, Adler JH, Tagari H, Eyal E (1978) Responses of dairy ewes before and after parturition to different nutritional regimes during pregnancy. Part 2. Energy intake, body weight changes during lactation and milk production. Ann Zootech 27:335–346Google Scholar
  29. Stirling I (1975) Factors affecting the evolution of social behaviour in the pinnipedia. Rapp P-V Reun Cons Int Explor Mer 169:205–212Google Scholar
  30. Stockdale CR, King KR, Patterson IF, Ryan DT (1981) Hay supplements to overcome feeding of dairy cows. 1. Early lactation. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Hubs 21:148–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. W. Doidge
    • 1
  • J. P. Croxall
    • 1
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations