Advertisement

Irrigation Science

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 289–308 | Cite as

Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique

  • Neil C. Turner
Article

Summary

The pressure chamber has been widely used in the measurement of total water potential and pressure-volume relations of leaves, twigs and, to a lesser extent, roots. Some of the benefits and precautions in its use in these studies are reviewed and discussed. The pressure chamber has also been used to determine hydraulic resistances of plants, to collect xylem sap, to determine the water potential at various points in the xylem and to establish membrane damage of plants. Developments in this field are reviewed and discussed.

Keywords

Water Management Water Pollution Water Potential Water Status Total Water 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acock B (1975) An equilibrium model of leaf water potential which separates intra- and extracellular potentials. Aust J Plant Physiol 2:253Google Scholar
  2. Bahari ZA, Pallardy SG, Parker WC (1985) Photosynthesis, water relations, and drought adaptation in six woody species of oak-hickory forests in Central Missouri. Forest Sci 31:557Google Scholar
  3. Begg JE, Turner NC (1970) Water potential gradients in field tobacco. Plant Physiol 46:343Google Scholar
  4. Blum A, Sullivan CY, Eastin JD (1973) On the pressure chamber technique for estimating leaf water potential in sorghum. Agron J 65:337Google Scholar
  5. Boyer JS (1967a) Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber. Plant Physiol 42:133Google Scholar
  6. Boyer JS (1967b) Matric potentials of leaves. Plant Physiol 42:213Google Scholar
  7. Boyer JS (1969) Measurement of the water status of plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 20:351Google Scholar
  8. Brown PW, Tanner CB (1983) Alfalfa osmotic potential: a comparison of the water-release curve and frozen-tissue methods. Agron J 75:91Google Scholar
  9. Campbell GS (1985) Instruments for measuring plant water potential and its components. In: Marshall B, Woodward FI (eds) Instrumentation for environmental physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 193Google Scholar
  10. Campbell GS, Papendick RI, Rabie E, Shayo-Ngowi AJ (1979) A comparison of osmotic potential, elastic modulus, and apoplastic water in leaves of dryland winter wheat. Agron J 71:31Google Scholar
  11. Cheung YNS, Tyree MT, Dainty J (1975) Water relations parameters on single leaves obtained in a pressure bomb and some ecological interpretations. Can J Bot 53:1342Google Scholar
  12. Davis SD, Mooney HA (1986) Tissue water relations of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs. Oecologia 70:527Google Scholar
  13. De Roo HC (1969) Water stress gradients in plants and soil-root systems. Agron J 61:511Google Scholar
  14. Dixon HH (1914) Transpiration and the ascent of sap in plants. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Gee GW, Janes BE, Tan CS (1973) A chamber for applying pressure to roots of intact plants. Plant Physiol 52:472Google Scholar
  16. Gee GW, Liu W, Olvang H, Janes BE (1974) Use of pressure bomb measurements to estimate root water potentials. Agron J 66:75Google Scholar
  17. Gollan T, Passioura JB, Munns R (1986) Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:459Google Scholar
  18. Hellkvist J, Richards GP, Jarvis PG (1974) Vertical gradients of water potential and tissue water relations in Sitka spruce trees measured with the pressure chamber. J Appl Ecol 11:637Google Scholar
  19. Henson IE (1982) Osmotic adjustment to water stress in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L. Leeke) in a controlled environment. J Exp Bot 33:78Google Scholar
  20. Hinckley TM, Duhme F, Hinckley AR, Richter H (1980) Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity. Plant Cell Environ 3:131Google Scholar
  21. Höfler K (1920) Ein Schema für die osmotische Leistung der Pflanzenzelle. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 38:288Google Scholar
  22. Jachetta JJ, Appleby AP, Boersma L (1986) Use of the pressure vessel to measure concentrations of solutes in apoplastic and membrane-filtered symplastic sap in sunflower leaves. Plant Physiol 82:995Google Scholar
  23. Janes BE, Gee GW (1973) Changes in transpiration, net carbon dioxide assimilation and leaf water potential resulting from application of hydrostatic pressure to roots of intact pepper plans. Physiol Plant 28:201Google Scholar
  24. Jones MM, Turner NC (1980) Osmotic adjustment in expanding and fully expanded leaves of sunflower in response to water deficits. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:181Google Scholar
  25. Jones MM, Turner NC, Osmond CB (1981) Mechanisms of drought resistance. In: Paleg LG, Aspinall D (eds) Physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, Sydney, p 15Google Scholar
  26. Kikuta SB, Kyriakopoulous E, Richter H (1985) Leaf hygrometer v. pressure chamber: a comparison of pressure-volume curve data obtained on single leaves by alternating measurements. Plant Cell Environ 8:363Google Scholar
  27. Klepper B, Barrs HD (1968) Effects of salt secretion on psychrometric determinations of water potential of cotton leaves. Plant Physiol 33:1138Google Scholar
  28. Kobata T, Takami S (1984) Estimation of the leaf water potential in rice by the pressure chamber technique. Jpn J Crop Sci 53:290Google Scholar
  29. Kyriakopoulos E, Richter H (1981) Pressure-volume curves and drought injury. Physiol Plant 52:124Google Scholar
  30. Ladiges PY (1975) Some aspects of tissue water relations in three populations of Eucalyptus viminalis Labill. New Phytol 75:53Google Scholar
  31. Leach JE, Woodhead T, Day W (1982) Bias in pressure chamber measurements of leaf water potential. Agric Meteorol 27:257Google Scholar
  32. McCown RL, Wall BH (1979) Improvement of pressure chamber measurements of two legumes by constriction of stems. Plant Soil 52:447Google Scholar
  33. Melkonian JJ, Whofe J, Steponkus PL (1982) Determination of the volumetric modulus of elasticity of wheat leaves by pressure-volume relations and the effect of drought conditioning. Crop Sci 22:116Google Scholar
  34. Meyer WS, Ritchie JT (1980) Resistance to water flow in the sorghum plant. Plant Physiol 65: 33Google Scholar
  35. Milburn JA (1979) Water flow in plants. Longman, London, p 149Google Scholar
  36. Millar BD (1982) Accuracy and usefulness of psychrometer and pressure chamber for evaluating water potentials of Pinus radiata needles. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:499Google Scholar
  37. Millar BD, Hansen GK (1975) Exclusion errors in pressure chamber estimates of leaf water potential. Ann Bot 39:915Google Scholar
  38. Munns R (1985) Na+, K+ and Cl in xylem sap flowing to shoots of NaCl-treated barley. J Exp Bot 36:1032Google Scholar
  39. Munns R, Termaat A (1986) Whole-plant responses to salinity. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:143Google Scholar
  40. O'Toole JC, Moya TB (1981) Comparison of pressure chamber and psychrometer estimates of leaf water potential in rice. Plant Soil 62:313Google Scholar
  41. Passioura JB (1980a) The meaning of matric potential. J Exp Bot 31:1161Google Scholar
  42. Passioura JB (1980b) The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings. J Exp Bot 31:333Google Scholar
  43. Passioura JB (1982) Water in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological plant ecology, II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. Encycl Plant Physiol 12B, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 5Google Scholar
  44. Passioura JB, Munns R (1984) Hydraulic resistance of plants. II. Effects of rooting medium, and time of day, in barley and lupin. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:341Google Scholar
  45. Passioura JB, Tanner CB (1985) Oscillations in apparent hydraulic conductance of cotton plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 12:455Google Scholar
  46. Richter H (1978) A diagram for the description of water relations in plant cells and organs. J Exp Bot 29:1197Google Scholar
  47. Richter H, Duhme F, Glatzel G, Hinckley TM, Karlic H (1980) Some limitations and applications of the pressure-volume curve technique in ecological research. In: Grace J, Ford ED, Jarvis PG (eds) Plants and their atmospheric environment. Symp Br Ecol Soc No. 21, Blackwell, Oxford, p 263Google Scholar
  48. Ritchie GA, Hinckley TM (1975) The pressure chamber as an instrument for ecological research. Adv Ecol Res 9:165Google Scholar
  49. Robichaux RH (1984) Variation in the tissue water relations of two sympatric Hawaiian Dubautia species and their natural hybrid. Oecologia 65:75Google Scholar
  50. Robichaux RH, Holsinger KE, Morse SE (1986) Turgor maintenance in Hawaiian Dubautia species: the role of variation in tissue osmotic and elastic properties. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 353Google Scholar
  51. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Hemingsen EA, Bradstreet ED (1964) Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential of leaves of mangrove and some other plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 52:119Google Scholar
  52. Scholander PIT, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339Google Scholar
  53. Schulze ED, Turner NC, Glatzel G (1984) Carbon, water and nutrient relations of two mistletoes and their hosts: a hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ 7:293Google Scholar
  54. Sobrado MA, Turner NC (1983a) Influence of water deficits on the water relations characteristics and productivity of wild and cultivated sunflowers. Aust J Plant Physiol 10:195Google Scholar
  55. Sobrado MA, Turner NC (1983b) Comparison of the water relations characteristics of Helianthus annuus and Helianthus petiolaris when subjected to water deficits. Oecologia 58:309Google Scholar
  56. Stark N, Spitzner C, Essig D (1985) Xylem sap analysis for determining nutritional status of trees: Pseudotsuga menziesii. Can J For Res 15:429Google Scholar
  57. Takami S, Turner NC, Rawson HM (1981) Leaf expansion of four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars in relation to water deficits. I. Patterns during plant development. Plant Cell Environ 4:399Google Scholar
  58. Thomas H (1986) Effect of rate of dehydration on leaf water status and osmotic adjustment in Dactylis glomerata L., Lolium perenne L. and L. multiflorum Lam. Ann Bot 57:225Google Scholar
  59. Turner NC (1976) Use of the pressure chamber in membrane damage studies. J Exp Bot 27:1085Google Scholar
  60. Turner NC (1981 a) Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant Soil 58:339Google Scholar
  61. Turner NC (1981 b) Correction of flow resistances of plants measured from covered and exposed leaves. Plant Physiol 68:1090Google Scholar
  62. Turner NC (1986) Crop water deficits: a decade of progress. Adv Agron 39:1Google Scholar
  63. Turner NC, Long MJ (1980) Errors arising from rapid water loss in the measurement of leaf water potential by the pressure chamber technique. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:527Google Scholar
  64. Turner NC, Singh DP (1984) Responses of adaxial and abaxial stomata to light and water deficits in sunflower and sorghum. New Phytol 96:187Google Scholar
  65. Turner NC, Begg JE, Tonnet ML (1978) Osmotic adjustment of sorghum and sunflower crops in response to water deficits and its influence on the water potential at which stomata close. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:597Google Scholar
  66. Turner NC, De Roo HC, Wright WH (1971) A pressure chamber for the measurement of plant water potential. Conn Agric Exp Stn, New Haven, Spec Soils Bull 23Google Scholar
  67. Turner NC, Spurway RA, Schulze ED (1984) Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species. Plant Physiol 74:316Google Scholar
  68. Turner NC, O'Toole JC, Cruz RT, Yambao EB, Ahmad S, Namuco OS, Dingkuhn M (1986) Responses of seven rice cultivars to water deficits. II. Osmotic adjustment, leaf elasticity, leaf extension, leaf death, stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Field Crops Res 13:273Google Scholar
  69. Turner NC, Stern WR, Evans P (1987) Water relations and osmotic adjustment of leaves and roots of lupins in response to water deficits. Crop Sci 27:977Google Scholar
  70. Tyree MT (1976) Negative turgor pressure in plant cells: fact or fallacy? Can J Bot 54:2738Google Scholar
  71. Tyree MT, Cheung YNS (1977) Resistance to water flow in Fagus grandifolia leaves. Can J Bot 55:2591Google Scholar
  72. Tyree MT, Dainty J (1973) The water relations of hemlock (Tsuga canadiensis). II. The kinetics of water exchange between symplast and apoplast. Can J Bot 51:1481Google Scholar
  73. Tyree MT, Jarvis PG (1982) Water in tissues and cells. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological plant ecology. II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. Encycl Plant Physiol 12B, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 35Google Scholar
  74. Tyree MT, Hammel HT (1972) The mesurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. J Exp Bot 23:267Google Scholar
  75. Tyree MT, Richter H (1981) Alternative methods of analysing water potential isotherms: some cautions and clarifications. I. The impact of non-ideality and of some experimental errors. J Exp Bot 32:643Google Scholar
  76. Tyree MT, Richter H (1982) Alternate methods of analysing water potential isotherms: some cautions and clarifications. II. Curvilinearity in water potential isotherms. Can J Bot 60:911Google Scholar
  77. Tyree MT, Caldwell C, Dainty J (1975) The water relations of hemlock (Tsuga canadiensis). V. The localization of resistances to bulk water flow. Can J Bot 53:1078Google Scholar
  78. Tyree MT, Dainty J, Benis M (1973) The water relations of hemlock (Tsuga canadiensis). I. Some equilibrium water relations as measured by the pressure-bomb technique. Can J Bot 51:1471Google Scholar
  79. Tyree MT, MacGregor ME, Petrov A, Upenieks MI (1978) A comparison of systematic errors between the Richards and Hammel methods of measuring tissue — water relations parameters. Can J Bot 56:2153Google Scholar
  80. Van Alfen NK, Turner NC (1975 a) Influence of a Ceratocystis ulmi toxin on water relations of elm (Ulmus americana). Plant Physiol 55:312Google Scholar
  81. Van Alfen NK, Turner NC (1975b) Changes in alfalfa stem conductance induced by Corynebacterium insidiosum toxin. Plant Physiol 55:559Google Scholar
  82. Waring RH, Cleary BD (1967) Plant moisture stress: evaluation by pressure bomb. Science 155:1248Google Scholar
  83. Weatherley PE (1970) Some aspects of water relations. Adv Bot Res 3:171Google Scholar
  84. Wenkert W (1980) Measurement of tissue osmotic pressure. Plant Physiol 65:614Google Scholar
  85. Wenkert W, Lemon ER, Sinclair TR (1978) Water content-potential relationship in soya bean: changes in component potentials for mature and immature leaves under field conditions. Ann Bot 42:295Google Scholar
  86. Wilson JR, Fisher MJ, Schulze ED, Dolby GR, Ludlow MM (1979) Comparison between pressure-volume and dewpoint-hygrometry techniques for determining the water relations characteristic of grass and legume leaves. Oecologia 41:77Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil C. Turner
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Dryland Crops and Soils Research UnitLaboratory for Rural ResearchWembleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations