Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 365–372 | Cite as

Parent-offspring cooperation in the blue-footed boody (Sula nebouxii): social roles in infanticial brood reduction

  • Hugh Drummond
  • Edda González
  • José Luis Osorno


Reproduction in the blue-footed boody was examined for evidence of parent-offspring conflict over infanticidal reduction of the brood. Parental investment was analysed by measuring clutch characteristics, and chick growth and mortality in four seasons. Direct observations were made of behavioral development to determine the social roles of family members. The modal clutch was two similar-sized eggs, which hatched 4.0 days apart due to a 5.1-day laying interval and immediate incubation of the first egg. On average, senior chicks grew faster than their sibs in years of good or poor growth (Fig. 2), maintaining the initial size disparity for at least 65 days (Fig. 1). Differential mortality of junior chicks was associated not with poor personal growth, but with a 20–25% weight deficiency of the senior sib, implying siblicidal brood reduction triggered at a weight threshold. Senior chicks established behavioral dominance through low-frequency pecking, but ordinarily did not eliminate their sibs nor substantially suppress their begging (Fig. 3), even when their own growth was 16% below potential. Parents fed dominant chicks more frequently than subordinates, but did not intervene in inter-sib aggression, even when it reached a siblicidal level. The weight and possibly the dominance relation between sibs was inverted in 12% of pairs. The theoretical prediction of conflict over elimination of the junior chick was not supported; rather, parents and senior chick cooperate, as if their fitness interests were congruent. Further, provisional tolerance of the junior chick by its underweight senior sib is consistent with “self-sacrifice” to increase the latter's inclusive fitness.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Braun BM, Hunt GL (1983) Brood reduction in black-legged kittiwakes. Auk 100: 469–476Google Scholar
  2. Clark AB, Wilson DS (1981) Avian breeding adaptations: hatching asynchrony, brood reduction and nest failure. Q Rev Biol 56: 253–277Google Scholar
  3. Edwards TC, Collopy MW (1983) Obligate and facultative brood reduction in eagles: an examination of factors that influence fratricide. Auk 100: 630–635Google Scholar
  4. Fujioka M (1985) Food delivery and sibling competition in experimentally even-aged broods of the cattle egret. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17: 67–74Google Scholar
  5. Fujioka M (1986) Sibling competition and siblicide in asynchronously-hatching broods of the cattle egret Bubulcus ibis. Anim Behav 33: 1228–1242Google Scholar
  6. Gould SJ (1982) The guano ring. Nat Hist 91: 12–19Google Scholar
  7. Hahn DC (1981) Asynchronous hatching in the laughing gull: cutting losses and reducing rivalry. Anim Behav 29: 421–427Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour: I, II J Theor Biol 7: 1–52Google Scholar
  9. Howe HF (1976) Egg size, hatching asynchrony, sex and brood reduction in the common grackle. Ecology 57: 1195–1207Google Scholar
  10. Hussell DJT (1972) Factors affecting clutch size in arctic passerines. Ecol Monogr 42: 317–364Google Scholar
  11. Ingram C (1959) The importance of juvenile cannibalism in the breeding biology of certain birds of prey. Auk 76: 218–226Google Scholar
  12. Lack D (1947). The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89: 302–352Google Scholar
  13. Lack D (1954) The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Lack D (1966) Population Studies of Birds. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Lahner PH (1976) Handbook of Ethological Methods. Garland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Macnair MR, Parker GA (1979) Models of parent-offspring conflict III. Intra-brood conflict. Anim Behav 27: 1202–1209Google Scholar
  17. Meyburg BU (1974) Sibling aggression and mortality among nestling eagles. Ibis 116: 224–228Google Scholar
  18. Metcalf RA, Stamps JA, Krishnan VV (1979) Parent-offspring conflict which is not limited by degree of kinship. J Theor Biol 76: 99–107Google Scholar
  19. Mock DW (1984a) Infanticide, siblicide, and avian nestling mortality. In: Hausfater G, Hrdy SB (eds) Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives. Aldine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Mock DW (1984b) Siblicidal aggression and resource monopolization in birds. Science 225: 731–733Google Scholar
  21. Mock DW (1985) Siblicidal brood reduction: the prey-size hypothesis. Am Nat 125: 327–343Google Scholar
  22. Mock DW, Ploger B (1986) Parental manipulation of optimal hatch asynchrony in cattle egrets: an experimental study. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Nelson JB (1966) Clutch size in the Sulidae. Nature 214: 435–436Google Scholar
  24. Nelson JB (1978) The Sulidae: Gannets and Boobies. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Nuechterlein GL (1981) Asynchronous hatching and sibling competition in western grebe broods. Can J Zool 59: 994–998Google Scholar
  26. O'Connor RJ (1978a) Brood reduction in birds: selection for fratricide, infanticide, and suicide? Anim Behav 26: 79–96Google Scholar
  27. O'Connor RJ (1978b) Growth strategies in nestling passerines. Living Bird 16: 209–238Google Scholar
  28. Parker GA (1985) Models of parent-offspring conflict V. Effects of the behaviour of the two parents. Anim Behav 33: 519–533Google Scholar
  29. Parker GA, Macnair MR (1978) Models of parent-offspring conflict I Monogamy. Anim Behav 26: 97–111Google Scholar
  30. Parker GA, Macnair MR (1979) Models of parent-offspring conflict IV. Suppression: evolutionary retaliation by the parents. Anim Behav 27: 1210–1235Google Scholar
  31. Proctor DLC (1975) The problem of chick loss in the south polar skua Catharacta maccormicki. Ibis 117: 452–459Google Scholar
  32. Richter W (1982) Hatching asynchrony: the nest failure hypothesis and brood reduction. Am Nat 120: 828–832Google Scholar
  33. Ricklefs RE (1965) Brood reduction in the curve-billed thrasher. Condor 67: 505–510Google Scholar
  34. Ryden O, Bengsston H (1980) Differential begging and locomotory behaviour by early and late hatched nestlings affecting the distribution of food in asynchronously hatched broods of altricial birds. Z Tierpsychol 53: 209–224Google Scholar
  35. Spellerberg IF (1971a) Breeding behaviour of the McCormick skua Catharacta maccormicki in Antarctica. Ardea 59: 189–230Google Scholar
  36. Spellerberg IF (1971b) Aspects of McCormick skua breeding biology. Ibis 113: 357–363Google Scholar
  37. Stamps JA, Metcalf RA (1980) Parent-offspring conflict. In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? Westview Boulder, CoGoogle Scholar
  38. Stamps JA, Metcalf RA, Krishnan VV (1978) A genetic analysis of parent-offspring conflict. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3: 369–392Google Scholar
  39. Stinson CH (1979) On the selective advantage of fratricide in raptors. Evolution 33: 1219–1225Google Scholar
  40. Trivers RL (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 14: 249–264Google Scholar
  41. Young EC (1963) The breeding behaviour of the South Polar skua, Catharacta maccormicki. Ibis 105: 203–233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh Drummond
    • 1
  • Edda González
    • 1
  • José Luis Osorno
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Biología, Departamento de EcologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxicoMéxico

Personalised recommendations