Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 421–427 | Cite as

Effects of parasites on foraging and defense behavior of a termitophagous ant, Pheidole titanis Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • Donald H. FeenerJr.
Article

Summary

Pheidole titanis Wheeler, an ant that occurs in desert and deciduous thorn forest in the southwestern United States and western Mexico, is a predator on termites. In the dry season well-coordinated raids against termite foraging parties occur early in the morning or late in the afternoon, whereas in the wet season most raids occur at night. This seasonal shift in the timing of raids is due to the increased activity of a fly (Diptera: Phoridae) that is a specialist parasitoid on P. titanis workers and soldiers. When parasitic flies discover P. titanis nest entrances or raiding columns, workers stop foraging and defend themselves against oviposition attacks. Flies are only active during the day and never interfere with foraging at night. However, P. titanis does not increase the frequency of raids at night and, as a result, colonies collect less food in the wet season compared to the dry season. Presence of parasitic flies also interferes with normal defense behavior of P. titanis against conspecific and heterospecific enemy ants. Dissections of P. titanis workers and soldiers suggest that the parasitism rate by flies is less than 2% and observations indicate that parasitic flies are much rarer than their host workers and soldiers. Nonetheless, these parasites exert a strong ecological impact on their host.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein RA (1976) The adaptive value of polymorphism in an alpine ant, Formica neorufibarbis gelida Wheeler. Psyche 83:180–184Google Scholar
  2. Bullock SH (1986) Climate of Chamela, Jalisco and trends in the south coastal region of Mexico. Arch Meteorol Geophys Bioclimatol Ser B Theor Appl Climatol 36:297–316Google Scholar
  3. Creighton WS, Gregg RE (1955) New and little-known species Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the southwestern United States and Northern Mexico. Colo Univ Studies, Biol Ser 3:1–46Google Scholar
  4. Davidson DW (1977a) Species diversity and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology 58:711–724Google Scholar
  5. Davidson DW (1977b) Foraging ecology and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology 58:725–737Google Scholar
  6. Disney RHL (1982) Three new species of scuttle fly (Diptera: Phoridae) that parasitize ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in North America. J Zool Lond 197:473–481Google Scholar
  7. Feener DH Jr (1981) Competition between ant species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies. Science 214:815–817Google Scholar
  8. Feener DH Jr (1986) Alarm-recruitment behaviour of Pheidole militicida Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecol Entomol 11:67–74Google Scholar
  9. Feener DH Jr (1987a) Size-selective oviposition in Pseudacteon crawfordi (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasite of fire ants. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80:148–151Google Scholar
  10. Feener DH Jr (1987b) Alarm-recruitment in Pheidole morrisi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and a general model of defense behavior in Pheidole. J Kans Entomol Soc 60:569–575Google Scholar
  11. Hunt JH (1974) Temporal activity patterns in two competing ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 81:237–242Google Scholar
  12. Levings SC (1983) Seasonal, annual, and among-site variation in the ground ant community of a deciduous tropical forest: some causes of patchy species distributions. Ecol Monogr 53:435–455Google Scholar
  13. Levings SC, Windsor DM (1984) Litter moisture content as a determinant of litter arthropod distribution and abundance during the dry season on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 16:125–131Google Scholar
  14. Lott EJ, Bullock SH, Solis-Magallanes JA (1987) Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests of Coastal Jalisco. Biotropica 19:228–235Google Scholar
  15. Milliken GA, Johnson DE (1984) Analysis of messy data, vol. 1. Designed experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanders CJ (1972) Seasonal and daily activity patterns of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) in northwestern Ontario (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Can Ent 104:1681–1687Google Scholar
  18. Torres JA (1984a) Niches and coexistence of ant communities in Puerto Rico: repeated patterns. Biotropica 16:284–295Google Scholar
  19. Torres JA (1984b) Diversity and distribution of ant communities Puerto Rico. Biotropica 16:296–303Google Scholar
  20. Whitford WG, Depree DJ, Hamilton P, Ettershank G (1981) Foraging ecology of seed-harvesting ants, Pheidole spp. in Chihuahuan desert ecosystem. Am Midl Nat 105:159–167Google Scholar
  21. Whitford WG, Ettershank G (1975) Factors affecting foraging activity in Chihuahuan desert harvester ants. Environ Entomol 4:689–696Google Scholar
  22. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson EO (1976) The organization of colony defense in the ant Pheidole dentata Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociol Biol 1:63–81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald H. FeenerJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstituteBalboaRepublic of Panama

Personalised recommendations