Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 147–156 | Cite as

Do pronghorn mothers reveal the locations of their hidden fawns?

  • John A. Byers
  • Karen Z. Byers
Article

Summary

Success of the ‘hider’ strategy in ungulates depends, in part, on the mother's ability to minimize information she transmits about her young's hiding place while remaining close enough to distract or drive away a predator. We predicted that pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) mothers should: (1) maintain minimum distances from their hidden fawns sufficient to cause the expected energy gain for a ground predator, systematically searching around the mother, to fall below that expected when searching for some other prey; (2) orient the axes of either head or trunk towald the hidden fawn no more frequently than would be expected by chance; (3) schedule behavior so that no activity is more likely than another to occur when a visit to the hidden fawn is imminent. At the National Bison Range, where coyote (Canis latrans) predation on pronghorn fawns is frequent, pronghorn mothers conform to predictions (1) and (3), but not (2). Within the first 10% of their time away from fawns, mothers reached an average distance of 70.4 m from their fawns' biding places and remained at that distance until 95% of their time away was clapsed. At this mother-fawn distance a coyote, using the mother's position to begin a systematic search for the fawn, and searching at a rate of 4 m2/s, would gain energy at a lower rate than it would hunting ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Mothers pointed both head and trunk toward their hidden fawns more frequently than would be expected by chance and coyotes, able to use this information to establish a 90° quadrant to search, could expect rates of gain higher than those obtainable in 360° search. Mothers especially tended to orient both head and trunk toward their fawns when standing or moving. Coyotes that begin a 90° search based on the mother's head or trunk position only when mothers were standing or moving, could expect rates of energy gain almost double those expected in 360° search or ground squirrel hunting. Maternal activities (stand, feed, recline, or move) were distributed evenly across all mother-fawn distances and across percent total time away from the fawn. Thus, activity was not a good predictor of a mother's likelihood of soon returning to her fawn. Mothers also remained away from their fawns long enough to cause the expected rate of energy gain for a coyote hiding and watching for the mother's return to the fawn to fall well below the rate expected for searching or ground squirrel hunting.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann M (1963) Naturalistic studies of maternal care in moose and elk. In: Reingold HL (ed) Maternal behavior in mammals. Wiley, New York, pp 233–253Google Scholar
  2. Autenreith RE, Fichter E (1975) On the behavior and socialization of pronghorn fawns. Wildl Monogr 42:1–111Google Scholar
  3. Barrett MW (1978) Pronghorn fawn mortality in Alberta. Proc 8th Biennial Pronghorn Antelope Workshop 1978:429–444Google Scholar
  4. Bartholomew GA (1977) Energy metabolism. In: Gordon MS, (ed) Animal physiology: principles and adaptations, 3rd edn. MacMillan, New York, pp 57–110Google Scholar
  5. Beale DM, Smith AD (1973) Mortality of pronghorn antelope fawns in western Utah. J Wildl Manage 37:343–352Google Scholar
  6. Bekoff M (1977) Canis latrans. Mamm Species 79:1–9Google Scholar
  7. Berger J (1979) “Predator harassment” as a defensive strategy in ungulates. Am Midl Nat 102:197–199Google Scholar
  8. Brobeck JR (1965) Regulation of energy exchange. In: Ruch TC, Patton HD (eds) Physiology and biophysics. Saunders, Philadelphia London, pp 1022–1049Google Scholar
  9. Bromley PT (1967) Pregnancy, birth, behavioral development of the fawn and territoriality in the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana Ord) on the national bison range. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Montana, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromley PT (1977) Aspects of the behavioural ecology and sociobiology of the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana). Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Calgary, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns EH (1969) Winter predation of golden eagles and coyotes on pronghorn antelope. Can Field Nat 84:301–304Google Scholar
  12. Buechner HK (1950) Life history, ecology and range use of the pronghorn antelope in trans-pecos Texas. Am Midl Nat 43:257–354Google Scholar
  13. Cahalane VH (1947) A deer-coyote episode. J Mammal 28:36–39Google Scholar
  14. Chapman D, Chapman N (1975) Fallow deer: Their history, distribution and biology. Terence Dalton, LavenhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Cody ML (1971) Finch flocks in the mohave desert.Theor Popul Biol 2:142–158Google Scholar
  16. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc Roy Soc Lond [Biol] 205:489–511Google Scholar
  17. Einarsen AS (1948) The pronghorn antelope and its management. Wildlife Management Institute,Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Espmark Y (1969) Mother-young relations and development of behaviour in roe deer (Capreolus capreohus L.). Viltrevy 6:461–529Google Scholar
  19. Galster W, Morrison P (1976) Seasonal changes in body composition of the arctic ground squirrel, Citellus undulatus. Can J Zool 54:74–78Google Scholar
  20. Ganong WF (1981) Review of medical physiology, 10th edn. Lange, Los AltosGoogle Scholar
  21. Gittleman JL, Harvey PH (1982) Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:57–63Google Scholar
  22. Gunten BL von (1978) Pronghorn fawn mortality of the national bison range. Proc 8th Biennial Pronghorn Antelope Workshop 1978:394–416Google Scholar
  23. Kitchen DW (1974) Social behavior and ecology of the pronghorn. Wildl Monogr 38:1–96Google Scholar
  24. Kruuk H (1972) The spotted hyena. A study of predation and social behavior. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Lent PC (1974) Mother-infant relationships in ungulates. In: Geist V, Walther FR (eds) The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management. IUCN, Morges, pp 14–55Google Scholar
  26. Langman VA (1977) Cow-ealf relationships in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa). Z Tierpsychol 43:264–286Google Scholar
  27. Litvaitis JA, Bartush WA (1980) Coyote-deer interactions during the fawning season in Oklahoma. Southwest Nat 25:62–68Google Scholar
  28. Leuthold W (1977) African ungulates. A comparative review of their ethology and behavioral ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Lipetz VE, Bekoff M (1980) Possible functions of predator harassment in pronghorn antelope. J Mammal 61:741–743Google Scholar
  30. MacConnell-Yount E, Smith C (1978) Mule deer-coyote interactions in north-central Colorado. J Mammal 59:422–423Google Scholar
  31. McNay ME, O'Gara BW (1982) Cattle-pronghorn interactions during the fawning season in northwestern Nevada. In: Peek JM, Dalke PD (eds) Wildlife livestock relationships proceedings 10. University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experimental Station, Moscow, pp 593–606Google Scholar
  32. Mitchell GJ (1980) The proughorn antelope in Alberta. Alberta Department of Lands and Forests Fish and Wildlife Division. CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  33. Morton ML (1975) Seasonal cycles of body weights and lipids in belding ground squirrels. Bull South Calif Acad Sci 74:128–143Google Scholar
  34. Morton ML, Tung HCL (1971) The relationship of total body lipid to fat depot weight and body weight in the belding ground squirrel. J Mammal 52:839–842Google Scholar
  35. Pratt DM, Anderson VH (1979) Giraffe cow-calf relationships and social development of the calf in the Serengeti. Z Tierpsychol 51:233–251Google Scholar
  36. Robbins CT, Moen AN (1975) Uterine composition and growth in pregnant white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 39:654–691Google Scholar
  37. Robbins CT, Moen AN, Reid JT (1974) Body composition of white-tailed deer. J Anim Sci 38:871–876Google Scholar
  38. Robinson WB (1952) Some observations on coyote predation in Yellowstone National park. J Mammal 33:470–476Google Scholar
  39. Romer AS (1966) Vertebrate paleontology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt-Nielsen K (1972) The energy cost of swimming, flying, and running. Science 177:222–228Google Scholar
  41. Spinage CA (1969) Naturalistic observations on the reproductive and maternal behaviour of the Uganda defassa waterbuck Kobus defassa ugandae Neumann. Z Tierpsychol 26:39–47Google Scholar
  42. Steigers WD Jr, Flinders JT (1984) Mortality and movements of mule deer fawns in Washington. J Wildl Manage 44:381–388Google Scholar
  43. Thompson WK (1949) Predation on antelope. J Wildl Manage 13:313–314Google Scholar
  44. Townsend CR, Hughes RN (1981) Maximizing net energy returns from foraging. In: Townsend CR, Galow P (eds) Physiological ecology: an evolutionary approach to resource use. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 86–108Google Scholar
  45. Truett JC (1979) Observations of coyote predation on mule deer fawns in Arizona. J Wildl Manage 43:956–958Google Scholar
  46. Underwood R (1979) Mother-infant relationships and behavioural ontogeny in the common eland (Taurotragus oryx oryx). S Afr J Wildl Res 9:27–45Google Scholar
  47. Walther FR (1965) Verhaltensstudien an der Grantsgazelle (Gazella granti Brooke, 1872) im Ngorongoro-Krater. Z Tierpsychol 22:167–208Google Scholar
  48. Webb SD (1977) A history of savanna vertebrates in the new world. Part 1: North America. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:355–380Google Scholar
  49. Wells MC, Bekoff M (1982) Predation by wild coyotes: behavioral and ecological analyses. J Mammal 63:118–127Google Scholar
  50. Wells MC, Lehner PN (1978) The relative importance of the distance senses in coyote predatory behavior. Anim Behav 26:251–258Google Scholar
  51. White M, Knowlton FF, Glazener WC (1972) Effects of damnewborn fawn behavior on capture and mortality. J Wildl Manage 36:897–906Google Scholar
  52. Zegers DA, Williams O (1977) Seasonal cycles of body weight and lipids in Richardson's ground squirrel, Spermophilus richardsonii elegans. Acta Theriol 22:380–383Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Byers
    • 1
  • Karen Z. Byers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations