Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 1–27 | Cite as

Happiness surveys: Some comparability issues and an exploratory survey based on just perceivable increments

  • Yew-Kwang Ng
Article

Abstract

Most questionnaires to obtain reports of happiness are primitive with the results obtained of low (interpersonal) comparability. This paper argues that happiness is intrinsically cardinally measurable and comparable though with many difficulties. Moreover, a sophisticated questionnaire was developed and used to obtain more accurate and interpersonally comparable reports of happiness based on the concept of just perceivable increments of pleasure/pain. Comparisons with the traditional questionnaire are also made (by the respondents) to show the superiority of the sophisticated questionnaire.

Key words

happiness welfare well-being interpersonal comparison cardinal utility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allais, M. and Hagen, O.: 1979, Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox (Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland).Google Scholar
  2. Luce,R. D.,Bush, R. R. and Galanter, E. (Eds.): 1963, Handbook of Mathematical Psychology 1 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  3. Merkel, J.: 1888–9, ‘Die Abhängigkeit zwischen Reiz und Empfindung’, Philosophische Studies 4, pp. 541–594; 5, pp. 245–291 and 499–557.Google Scholar
  4. Ng, Y-K.: 1975, ‘Bentham or Bergson? Finite sensibility, utility functions and social welfare functions’, Review of Economic Studies 52, pp. 545–569.Google Scholar
  5. Ng, Y-K.: 1984, ‘Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the neoclassical's?’, Social Choice and Welfare, pp. 177–186.Google Scholar
  6. Ng, Y-K.: 1985, ‘Some fundamental issues in social improvements’, Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare (Macmillan, London), pp. 435–469.Google Scholar
  7. Ng, Y-K.: 1988, ‘Economic efficiency versus egalitarian rights’, Kyklos 41, pp. 215–237.Google Scholar
  8. Ng, Y.-K.: 1990, ‘Welfarism and utilitarianism: A rehabilitation’, Utilitas, November 1990, 2(2), pp. 171–193.Google Scholar
  9. Seidl, C.: 1988, ‘Experimental utility functions of income and their associated tax schedules’, Diskussionsbeiträge aus dem Institut für Finanzwissenschaft der Universität Kiel, March.Google Scholar
  10. Sidgwick,H.: 1981, The Method of Ethics, 7th edition (Hackett, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
  11. Slovic,P. and Lichtenstein, S.: 1983, ‘Preference reversals: A broader perspective’, American Economic Review, September, 73(4), pp. 596–605.Google Scholar
  12. Stevens, S. S.: 1957, ‘On the psychophysical law’, Psychological Review 64, pp. 153–181.Google Scholar
  13. Tversky, A., Slovic, P. and Kahneman, D.: 1990, ‘The causes of preference reversal’, American Economic Review, March, 80(1), pp. 204–217.Google Scholar
  14. Veenhoven, R.: 1984, Conditions of Happiness (Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland).Google Scholar
  15. Wegener, B. (Ed.): 1982, Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yew-Kwang Ng
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations