C-heterochromatin polymorphism in Baetica ustulata: intraindividual variation and fluorescence banding patterns
- 35 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
In an attempt to determine the nature and extent of the extensive C-banding heterochromatin variation found in the monospecific genus Baetica, 52 individuals were analysed by C-banding and fluorescence methods. The use of fluorescent DNA-binding dyes with different specificities allowed us to distinguish three major categories of constitutive C-heterochromatin. Two of these correspond to AT-rich and GC-rich DNA; the third shows no fluorescence with any of the fluorochromes employed. Apart from confirming polymorphisms for C-band patterns in the medium-sized autosomes, several C-banding variants (cytotypes) were found in the two testes of one individual. From a comparative study of these cytotypes we deduce that equal or unequal sister chromatid exchanges, as well as mitotic crossovers, operating during the early germ line divisions have been the major mechanisms responsible for this intraindividual variation. Because of the high level of C-band polymorphism found in this species, it seems reasonable to argue that, for unknown reasons, certain processes that normally occur over generations have occurred repeatedly in this abnormal individual.
Keywords
Sister Chromatid Germ Line Sister Chromatid Exchange Fluorescence Banding Line DivisionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bennett MD (1982) The nucleotypic basis of the spatial ordering of chromosomes in eukaryotes and the implications of the order for genome evolution and phenotypic variation. In: Dover GA, Flavell RB (eds) Genome evolution. Academic Press, London pp 239–261Google Scholar
- Bennett MD (1983) The spatial distribution of chromosomes. In: Brandham PE, Bennett MD (eds) Kew chromosome conference II. George Allen and Unwin, London pp 71–79Google Scholar
- Callow RS (1985) Comments on Bennett's model of somatic chromosome disposition. Heredity 54:171–177Google Scholar
- Coates DJ, Smith D (1984) The spatial distribution of chromosomes in metaphase neuroblast cells from subspecific F1 hybrids of the grasshopper Caledia captiva. Chromosoma 90:338–348Google Scholar
- Comings DE (1980) Arrangement of the chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 53:131–143Google Scholar
- Chapelle A de la, Schröder J, Selander RK (1973) In situ localization and characterization of different classes of chromosomal DNA: acridine orange and quinacrine mustard fluorescence. Chromosoma 40:347–360Google Scholar
- Dover GA (1982) Molecular drive: a cohesive model of species evolution. Nature 299:111–117Google Scholar
- Fernández-Piqueras J, Rodriguez-Campos A, Sentís C, Rojo E (1984) C-heterochromatin variation in the monospecific genus Baetica (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Caryologia 37:69–76Google Scholar
- John B (1981) Heterochromatin variation in natural populations. Chromosomes Today 7:128–137Google Scholar
- John B, King M (1977) Heterochromatin variation in Cryptobothrus chrysophorus II. Patterns of C-banding. Chromosoma 65:59–79Google Scholar
- John B, King M (1982) The meiotic effects of heterochromatin in Heteropternis obscurella. Chromosoma 85:39–65Google Scholar
- John B, King M (1983) Population cytogenetics of Atractomorpha similis I. C-band variation. Chromosoma 88:57–68Google Scholar
- John B, King M, Schweizer D, Mendelak M (1985) Equilocality of heterochromatin distribution and heterochromatin heterogeneity in acridid grasshoppers. Chromosoma 91:185–200Google Scholar
- Jorgenson KF, van de Sande JH, Lin CC (1978) The use of base pair specific DNA binding agents as affinity labels for the study of mammalian chromosomes. Chromosoma 68:287–302Google Scholar
- King M (1980) C-banding studies on Australian hylid frogs: secondary constriction structure and the concept of euchromatin transformation. Chromosoma 80:191–217Google Scholar
- Loidl J (1983) Some features of heterochromatin in wild Allium species. Plant Syst Evol 143:117–131Google Scholar
- Sahar E, Latt SA (1978) Enhancement of banding patterns in human metaphase chromosomes by energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:5650–5654Google Scholar
- Sahar E, Latt SA (1980) Energy transfer and binding competition between dyes used to enhance staining differentiation in metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 79:1–28Google Scholar
- Schmid M (1980) Chromosome banding in Amphibia IV. Differentiation of GC and AT rich chromosome regions in Anura. Chromosoma 77:83–103Google Scholar
- Schweizer D (1976) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58:307–324Google Scholar
- Schweizer D (1980) Fluorescent chromosome banding in plants: applications, mechanisms and implications for chromosome structure. In: Davies DR, Hopwood RA (eds) Proc 4th John Innes Symposium, Norwich 1979. The plant genome. John Innes Charity, Norwich pp 61–72Google Scholar
- Schweizer D (1981) Counterstain enhanced chromosome banding. Hum Genet 57:1–14Google Scholar
- Schweizer D, Mendelak M, White MJD, Contreras N (1983) Cytogenetics of the parthenogenetic grasshopper Warramaba virgo and its bisexual relatives X. Patterns of fluorescent banding. Chromosoma 88:227–236Google Scholar
- Shaw D, Webb GC, Wilkinson P (1976) Population cytogenetics of the genus Caledia (Orthoptera: Acridina) II. Variation in the pattern of C-banding. Chromosoma 56:169–190Google Scholar
- Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating cpntromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304–306Google Scholar