, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 80–94 | Cite as

Species relationships in the genus Tulipa

  • David I. Southern


The relationships of diploid and polyploid species belonging to the sub-section Eriostemones of the genus Tulipa have been investigated from the point of view of chromosome morphology, relative DNA values, and meiotic pairing properties. Karyotype morphology is basically the same for all species and eight principal chromosome classes can be distinguished. The range of DNA values obtained by Feulgen cytophotometry for the diploid species is relatively small and provides little assistance in ascertaining the pattern of ploidy involved in the evolution of the group. Partial asynapsis and reverse loop pairing in several of the diploids at pachytene reveals a degree of structural differentiation which may be the outcome of hybridity between species. Significantly, these anomalies are rarely encountered at the equivalent tetraploid levels and a scheme is proposed to account for this behaviour.


Developmental Biology Structural Differentiation Diploid Species Polyploid Species Chromosome Morphology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bajer, A.: Change of length and volume of mitotic chromosomes in living cells. Hereditas (Lund.) 45, 579–596 (1959).Google Scholar
  2. John, B., and S. A. Henderson: Asynapsis and polyploidy in Schistocerca paranensis. Chromosoma (Berl.) 13, 111–147 (1962).Google Scholar
  3. Jones, K.: Chromosomes and the nature and origin of Anthoxanthum odoratum L. Chromosoma (Berl.) 15, 248–274 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. Lewis, K. R., and B. John: The meiotic consequences of spontaneous chromosome breakage. Chromosoma (Berl.) 18, 287–304 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. McLeish, J., and N. Sunderland: Measurements of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in higher plants by Feulgen photometry and chemical methods. Exp. Cell Res. 24, 527–540 (1961).Google Scholar
  6. Miller, O. L.: Cytological studies in asynaptic maize. Genetics 48, 1445–1466 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. Stebbins, G. L.: Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press 1950.Google Scholar
  8. Upcott, M.: The genetic structure of Tulipa. II Structural hybridity. J. Genet. 34, 339–398 (1937); - III Meiosis in polyploids. J. Genet. 37, 303–339 (1939).Google Scholar
  9. —, and L. F. La Cour: The genetic structure of Tulipa. I. A chromosome survey. J. Genet. 33, 237–254 (1936).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • David I. Southern
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamEngland
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of ManchesterManchesterEngland

Personalised recommendations