Chromosoma

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Diploid-tetraploid relationship among old-world members of the fish family Cyprinidae

  • Susumu Ohno
  • Junichi Muramoto
  • Lawrence Christian
  • Niels B. Atkin
Article

Abstract

Evidence suggesting that the goldfish and the carp of the family Cyprinidae are tetraploid species in relation to other members of the same family were presented. The two barb species, Barbus tetrazona and Barbus jasciatus, were chosen as representatives of diploid members of the family Cyprinidae. These barbs had the diploid chromosome number of 50 and 52 and the DNA value 20–22% that of placental mammals, while the goldfish (Carassius auratus) and the carp (Cyprinus carpio) had the diploid chromosome number of about 104 and the DNA value 50–52% that of placental mammals.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkin, N. B., G. Mattinson, W. Beçak, and S. Ohno: The comparative DNA content of 19 species of placental mammals, reptiles, and birds. Chromosoma (Berl.) 17, 1–10 (1965).Google Scholar
  2. Beçak, M. L., W. Beçak, and M. N. Rabello: Cytological evidence of constant tetraploidy in the bisexual South American frog, Odontophrynus americanus. Chromosoma (Berl.) 19, 188–193 (1966).Google Scholar
  3. Chen, T.: Comparative karyology of selected deepsea and shallow water teleost fishes. Ph. D. dissertation, Biology, Yale University 1967.Google Scholar
  4. Deeley, E. M.: An integrating microdensitometer for biological cells. J. sci. Instrum. 32, 263–267 (1955).Google Scholar
  5. Makino, S.: The chromosomes of the carp, Cyprinus carpio, including those of some related species of Cyprinidae for comparison. Cytologia (Tokyo) 9, 430–440 (1939).Google Scholar
  6. Matsui, Y.: Genetical studies on goldfish of Japan. J. Imperial Fisheries Inst. (Japan) 30, 1–96 (1934).Google Scholar
  7. Nogusa, S.: A comparative study of the chromosomes in fishes with particular considerations on taxonomy and evolution. Mem. Hyogo Univ. Agric. 3, 1–62 (1960).Google Scholar
  8. Ohno, S., and N. B. Atkin: Comparative DNA values and chromosome complements of eight species of fishes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 18, 455–466 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. Ojima, Y., S. Hitosumachi, and S. Makino: Cytogenetic studies in lower vertebrates. I. A preliminary report on the chromosomes of the funa (Carassius auratus) and the goldfish (a revised study). Proc. Japan Acad. 24, 62–66 (1966).Google Scholar
  10. Post, A.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen der Chromosomenzahlen bei Süßwasser-Teleosteern. Z. Zool., Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 3, 47–93 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. Rothfels, K., E. Sexsmith, M. Heimburger, and M. O. Krause: Chromosome size and DNA content of species of Anemone and related genera (Ranunculaceae). Chromosoma (Berl.) 20, 54–74 (1966).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susumu Ohno
    • 1
  • Junichi Muramoto
    • 1
  • Lawrence Christian
    • 1
  • Niels B. Atkin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyCity of Hope Medical CenterDuarteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Cancer ResearchMount Vernon HospitalNorthwoodEngland

Personalised recommendations