Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 409–415 | Cite as

The effects of mating system on male mate choice in a coral reef fish

  • E. P. van den Berghe
  • R. R. Warner
Article

Summary

We show how mate limitation appears to be critical in determining whether or not males exercise mate choice among available females. Thalassoma bifasciatum is a Caribbean reef fish with two distinct mating patterns: group-spawning and pair-spawning. In both mating systems, female fecundity is variable and size dependent, and female availability is high. However, sperm competition among group-spawning males apparently limits the number of effective matings in which a male may engage, whereas territorial pair-spawning males have little or no such limitation. Group-spawning males should be discriminating in their choice of mates and our data confirm this: there is strong evidence for assortative mating in group-spawns, with more large males joining in mating groups around large females. In contrast, pair-spawning males show no indication of mate preferences, and spawn with all females who arrive at their territories.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berven KA (1981) Male choice in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Evolution 35:707–722Google Scholar
  2. Burley N (1977) Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:3476–3479Google Scholar
  3. Burley N (1983) The meaning of assortative mating. Ethol Sociobiol 4:91–203Google Scholar
  4. Downhower JF, Brown L (1980) Male perferences in female mottled sculpins, Cottus bairdi. Anim Behav 28:778–783Google Scholar
  5. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–222Google Scholar
  6. Gimmelfarb A (1988) Processes of pair formation leading to assortative mating in biological populations: encounter mating model. Am Nat 161:865–884Google Scholar
  7. Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) The evolution of male and female parental care in fishes. Am Zool 25:807–822Google Scholar
  8. Gwynne DT (1981) Sexual difference theory: Mormon crickets show sex role reversal in mate choice. Science 213:779–780Google Scholar
  9. Halliday TR (1978) Sexual selection and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 180–213Google Scholar
  10. Kelly WH (1967) Marking freshwater and marine fish by injected dyes. Trans Am Fish Soc 96:163–175Google Scholar
  11. Loiselle PV (1982) Male spawning partner preferences in an arena breeding teleost, Cyprinodon maculorius californiensis Girard (Atherinomorpha: Cyprinodontidae). Am Nat 120:721–732Google Scholar
  12. Manning JT (1975) Male discrimination and investment in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and A mediterraneus Racovtsza (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 55:1–14Google Scholar
  13. Nakatsuru K, Kramer DL (1982) Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces: Characidae). Science 216:753–754Google Scholar
  14. Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166Google Scholar
  15. Sargent RC, Gross MR, van den Berghe EP (1986a) Male mate choice in fishes. Anim Behav 34:545–550Google Scholar
  16. Sargent RC, Taylor P, Gross MR (1986b) Parental care and the evolution of egg size in fishes. Am Nat 129:32–46Google Scholar
  17. Sargent RC, Gross MR, van den Berghe EP (1988) Male mate choice in fishes: a reply to Foote. Anim Behav 36:1230–1234Google Scholar
  18. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  19. van den Berghe EP, Gross MR (1989) Natural selection resulting from female breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43:125–140Google Scholar
  20. Warner RR (1984) Deferred reproduction as a response to sexual selection in a coral reef fish: a test of the life historical consequences. Evolution 38:148–162Google Scholar
  21. Warner RR (1985) Alternative mating behaviors in a coral reef fish: a life history analysis. Proc 4th Int Coral Reef Symp 4:145–150Google Scholar
  22. Warner RR (1986) The environmental correlates of female infidelity in a coral reef fish. pp 803–810. In: Uyemo T, Arai R, Taniuchi T, Matsuura K (eds) Indo-pacific fish biology: Proc of the Second International Conference on Indopacific Fishes. Ichthyol Soc JapGoogle Scholar
  23. Warner RR (1987) Female choice of sites versus mates in a coral reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Anim Behav 35:1470–1478Google Scholar
  24. Warner RR, Harlan RK (1982) Sperm competition and sperm storage as determinants of sexual dimorphism in the dwarf surfperch, Micrometrus minimus. Evolution 36:44–55Google Scholar
  25. Warner RR, Hoffman SG (1980) Local population size as a determinant of mating system and sexual composition in two tropical marine fishes (Thalassoma spp). Evolution 34:508–515Google Scholar
  26. Warner RR, Robertson DR, Leigh ER Jr (1975) Sex change and sexual selection. Science 190:633–638Google Scholar
  27. Warner RR, Robertson DR (1978) Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the western Caribbean. I. The Wrasses (Labridae). Smithsonian Contrib Zool 254:1–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. P. van den Berghe
    • 1
  • R. R. Warner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Marine Science InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations