Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 401–408 | Cite as

Mixed reproductive strategy and mate guarding in a semi-colonial passerine, the swallow Hirundo rustica

  • Anders Pape Møller
Article

Summary

Both male and female swallows Hirundo rustica have a mixed reproductive strategy (parental care for offspring and extra-pair couplations). Mate guarding protects females from male harassment and male swallows from being cuckolded. Females hide their fertile period by copulating successfully with their mates for an extended period during first clutches. Males guard in the pre-fertile period, when many unpaired males are present. Early breeding swallows guard more than late breeders since more sexual chases of females by non-mate males take place in the early period. Solitarily breeding females experience few chases by strange males; copulation frequency, length of copulation period and mate guarding is adjusted to a lower level than among colonial birds. Male guarding activity is more intense in the fertile than in the pre-fertile period. Guarding reduces success of extra-pair copulation attempts.

Three female swallows each paired and copulated with a single male and later changed to a new male before starting to breed. Extra-pair copulations most often take place between neighbouring swallows in the fertile period of the female. Many old, early breeding males and many young, late breeding females participate in extra-pair couplations. Successful extra-pair copulations peak in the fertile period contrary to success of pair copulations which does not change during the copulation period.

Keywords

Breeding Female Fertile Period Early Breeding Copulation Attempt Male Harassment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateman AJ (1948) Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368Google Scholar
  2. Beecher MD, Beecher IM (1979) Sociobiology of bank swallows: reproductive strategy of the male. Science 205:1282–1285Google Scholar
  3. Birkhead TR (1979) Mate guarding in the magpie Pica pica. Anim Behav 26:321–331Google Scholar
  4. Birkhead TR (1982) Timing and duration of mate guarding in magpies, Pica pica. Anim Behav 30:277–283Google Scholar
  5. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW (1975) Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  6. Buitron D (1983) Extra-pair courtship in black-billed magpies. Anim Behav 31:211–220Google Scholar
  7. Burger J (1981) Sexual differences in parental activities of breeding black skimmers. Am Nat 117:975–984Google Scholar
  8. Burns J, Cheng K, McKinney F (1980) Forced copulations in captive mallards: I. Fertilization of eggs. Auk 97:875–879Google Scholar
  9. Butler RW (1982) Wing fluttering by mud-gathering cliff-swallows. Avoidance of “rape” attempts? Auk 99:758–761Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610Google Scholar
  12. Fitch MA, Shugart GW (1984) Requirements for a mixed reproductive strategy in avian species. Am Nat 124:116–126Google Scholar
  13. Fujioka M, Yamagishi S (1981) Extramarital and pair copulations in the cattle egret. Auk 98:134–144Google Scholar
  14. Gladstone DE (1979) Promiscuity in monogamous colonial birds. Am Nat 114:545–557Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. J Theor Biol 7:1–52Google Scholar
  16. Hammond J (1952) Fertility. In: Parkes AS (ed) Marshall's physiology of reproduction, vol 2, 3rd edn. Longmans, New York, pp 648–740Google Scholar
  17. King AS (1982) Phallus. In: King AS, McLelland J (eds) Form and function in birds. Academic Press, New York, pp 107–147Google Scholar
  18. Lumpkin S (1981) Avoidance of cuckoldry in birds: the role of the female. Anim Behav 29:303–304Google Scholar
  19. Mineau P, Cooke F (1979) Rape in lesser snow goose. Behaviour 70:280–291Google Scholar
  20. Morris RD, Bidochka MJ (1982) Mate-guarding in herring gulls. Colon Waterbirds 5:124–129Google Scholar
  21. Mumme RL, Koenig WD, Pitelka FA (1983) Mate guarding in the Acorn Woodpecker: within-group reproductive competition in a cooperate breeder. Anim Behav 31:1094–1106Google Scholar
  22. Power HW, Doner CGP, (1980) Experiments on cuckoldry in the mountain bluebird. Am Nat 116:689–704Google Scholar
  23. Power HW, Litovich E, Lombardo M (1981) Male starlings delay incubation to avoid being cuckolded. Auk 98:386–389Google Scholar
  24. Sikal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  25. Svensson L (1975) Identification guide to European passerines. Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  26. Tienhoven A van (1983) Reproductive physiology of vertebrates. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  27. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  28. Vietinghoff-Riesch A von (1955) Die Rauchschwalbe. Duncker and Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Wetherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygamy threshold: “the sexy son hypothesis’. Am Nat 113:201–208Google Scholar
  30. Werschkul DF (1982) Nesting ecology of the little blue heron: promiscuous behavior. Condor 84:381–384Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Pape Møller
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological Laboratory, Institute of Zoology and ZoophysiologyUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations